**LA LAKERS THREAD** Sitting on 17! 2023-2024 offseason begins

Just to reiterate

Eric Pincus @EricPincus
·
6h

I know this is abstract for some, but the possibility of Paul George significantly reduces any move with Randle or Russell going out from LA
 
Last edited:
Does it say reduce or eliminate completely? Have two clients that shared agents NEVER been traded for each other?
 
Honestly I'm failing to see the upside in trading for PG right now unless your unloading those bad contracts. Otherwise, just wait it out.
 
^ I think the thing is though, is the risk of him liking where he ends up despite the "rental" reports that are out there.
 
Last edited:
Honestly I'm failing to see the upside in trading for PG right now unless your unloading those bad contracts. Otherwise, just wait it out.

You pretty much have to trade JC and black anyway for future cap space. Trading dlo for PG would be dumb as hell tho. If anything he gets traded for someone else, not for a guy that has all but sworn on the Bible that he's coming to your team regardless
 
Last edited:
Honestly I'm failing to see the upside in trading for PG right now unless your unloading those bad contracts. Otherwise, just wait it out.

You pretty much have to trade JC and black anyway for future cap space. Trading dlo for PG would be dumb as hell tho. If anything he gets traded for someone else, not for a guy that has all but sworn on the Bible that he's coming to your team regardless
You wouldn't trade DLo for PG straight up?
 
I got it. That one extra year would go a long ways, especially for a player that wants to play for you anyway.  I'm not the biggest D'Lo fan but I have a bad feeling about trading him without seeing him at the 2 first.

In retrospect, I really, really want to know the thought process in giving Deng and Mozgov those deals to begin with.
 
Back
Top Bottom