The signs of why the Lakers traded for Dorian Finney-Smith are already showing.
Yes, Finney-Smith is still easing into the lineup two games after Los Angeles traded D’Angelo Russell, Maxwell Lewis and three second-round picks for Shake Milton and him. And yes, he scored only three points over 24 minutes during Thursday’s win over the Trail Blazers. But there are already flashes of what he can do to help — and surely, those will become more common as he grows on the West Coast.
Look at this sequence he pulled off Thursday against Portland, when he thwarted explosive 21-year-old Shaedon Sharpe, then jogged into a catch-and-shoot 3-pointer:
The Lakers needed a plug-and-play wing, someone who could knock in a deep ball, provide length on the perimeter and stop someone like Sharpe on drives like the one above. They got one in Finney-Smith — and they did it without sacrificing any first-round picks.
Head coach J.J. Redick is already showing trust in the 6-7 veteran. Finney-Smith is coming off the bench, but he closed both halves of the Portland game.
The beauty of this trade isn’t only the players involved. It’s also the timing.
Los Angeles now has time to evaluate its renovated roster before the Feb. 6 trade deadline. Finney-Smith could change the team’s dynamic, spurring it to make another move over the coming weeks. The Lakers could realize they lost too much playmaking with Russell’s departure, only to swing a trade for a facilitator. They could realize it’s worthwhile to stand pat. They also get a month and a half with Finney-Smith before considering a decision about his future.
Finney-Smith can become a free agent after this season. He has a $15.4 million player option for 2025-26. But he also becomes eligible for an extension Feb. 12. If he fits as the Lakers expect him to, is it possible he never hits the market at all?
As The Athletic has covered previously, a free agent’s best chance at getting paid this summer is by his own team. Only a few organizations have meaningful cap room and most of them are uncompetitive. Finney-Smith is the ultimate player with value on a winning squad but without much on a losing one. In an environment where extensions are more common than ever, could Finney-Smith opt for one, too?
It’s possible, if he were to hit the open market this summer, he would not receive an offer higher than the mid-level exception, which projects to be worth $14.1 million in 2025-26 salary.
Is there a compromise to be made come Feb. 12? Finney-Smith could decline the player option and take a multi-year deal that starts a tad below $15.4 million but a smidgen above the mid-level. Finney-Smith gets security. Los Angeles gets a malleable, winning player.
The Lakers have options. At least today, they are better than they were a week ago.