Keri Hilson Performing on George Lopez. Vol. Dat Mass Is Currently Viewable In This Thread. Video.

Originally Posted by yeahitsRUST

Originally Posted by GaBeGRaMz


Her butt is like perfect.
devil.gif
This man knows.


basically......she's the type of body i like on black women
embarassed.gif
. anyone saying where's the mass likes fat chicks unequivocally.
 
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

DC,

I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.

I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.

To each their own.
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.
 
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

DC,

I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.

I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.

To each their own.
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.
 
Originally Posted by knightngale

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

DC,

I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.

I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.

To each their own.
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.


dudes in here looking for gluteal carcinogenesis.
30t6p3b.gif
 
Originally Posted by knightngale

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

DC,

I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.

I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.

To each their own.
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.


dudes in here looking for gluteal carcinogenesis.
30t6p3b.gif
 
Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.
 
Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.
 
Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.


i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.


i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey

Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.


i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
laugh.gif
It wasn't that good now.
laugh.gif


Some females just do NOT look right doing certain stuff. Ciara is one of those girls that needs NOT to be going overboard. Its like if Candace Parker was twerking on youtube,
sick.gif
tired.gif
 
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey

Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.


i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
laugh.gif
It wasn't that good now.
laugh.gif


Some females just do NOT look right doing certain stuff. Ciara is one of those girls that needs NOT to be going overboard. Its like if Candace Parker was twerking on youtube,
sick.gif
tired.gif
 
Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by AntonLaVey

Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.


i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
laugh.gif
It wasn't that good now.
laugh.gif


Some females just do NOT look right doing certain stuff. Ciara is one of those girls that needs NOT to be going overboard. Its like if Candace Parker was twerking on youtube,
sick.gif
tired.gif


   hmm.......i mean was the last girl u had sex with as good looking as ciara. because when that video came out i posted it on facebook and there was a general consensus that she was bad.


maybe im saying this cause im 6ft4 and big as hell but i think ciara is very feminine...and more feminine than most females ive seen posted on this thread with "mass" looking like she would fit in the steelers 3-4 defense.


the candace parker analogy is a bit of a stretch granted i would wreck that.



im offended right now and i dont know why
eyes.gif
 
 
Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by AntonLaVey

Originally Posted by RKO2004

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by RavageBX

As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.


as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.

Ciara too brolic for all that anyway
sick.gif
.


i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
laugh.gif
It wasn't that good now.
laugh.gif


Some females just do NOT look right doing certain stuff. Ciara is one of those girls that needs NOT to be going overboard. Its like if Candace Parker was twerking on youtube,
sick.gif
tired.gif


   hmm.......i mean was the last girl u had sex with as good looking as ciara. because when that video came out i posted it on facebook and there was a general consensus that she was bad.


maybe im saying this cause im 6ft4 and big as hell but i think ciara is very feminine...and more feminine than most females ive seen posted on this thread with "mass" looking like she would fit in the steelers 3-4 defense.


the candace parker analogy is a bit of a stretch granted i would wreck that.



im offended right now and i dont know why
eyes.gif
 
 
Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Nothing about her body is worth looking twice at. Nothing. She isn't a head turner. Cute faces aren't commanders of a room, nice bodies are. She doesn't have that.
I'm not disagreeing but you're stating an opinion. Not fact. There is a difference.
Of course it is an opinion.

Originally Posted by knightngale

Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.
LOL @ Them being thick.
 
Originally Posted by finnns2003

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Nothing about her body is worth looking twice at. Nothing. She isn't a head turner. Cute faces aren't commanders of a room, nice bodies are. She doesn't have that.
I'm not disagreeing but you're stating an opinion. Not fact. There is a difference.
Of course it is an opinion.

Originally Posted by knightngale

Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.
LOL @ Them being thick.
 
Listen guys,

Keri Hilson has no MASS whatsoever.

And that is awesome. Black chicks don't NEED to have huge $@#!! in order to be considered attractive.

I'd definitely eat her butt out no questions asked. Aside from the question, "will you eat my but out?"

To which the answer would be an emphatic "Yes!"


And the dude she was grindin on had the serious hoverhands goin. If that were me I'd do that "hit it from the back" thing where you grab her hips and get to thrustin'. Chicks love that.
 
Back
Top Bottom