- 18,737
- 1,626
why does it seem like Durant is always in DC...you gonna be in there Ballerific?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by yeahitsRUST
This man knows.Originally Posted by GaBeGRaMz
Her butt is like perfect.
Originally Posted by yeahitsRUST
This man knows.Originally Posted by GaBeGRaMz
Her butt is like perfect.
Originally Posted by mytmouse76
why does it seem like Durant is always in DC...you gonna be in there Ballerific?
Originally Posted by mytmouse76
why does it seem like Durant is always in DC...you gonna be in there Ballerific?
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
DC,
I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.
I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.
To each their own.
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
DC,
I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.
I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.
To each their own.
Originally Posted by knightngale
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
DC,
I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.
I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.
To each their own.
Originally Posted by knightngale
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
DC,
I do still consider her to have a body despite what you think she lacks. I guess you and I have have different standards. For me, a women does not need a lot of breast or mass for her to be considered to have a nice body. I would say she does have a butt. It is not flat. It is just not mass. You probably like phatties. So, anything less than a phatty to you is considered no butt.
I think she has an amazing structure of a body. She is very toned and she has nice thighs and killer legs. I think she'd have the perfect body to be a model, also due to her height.
To each their own.
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
Originally Posted by RKO2004
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
Ciara too brolic for all that anyway.
Originally Posted by RKO2004
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
Ciara too brolic for all that anyway.
It wasn't that good now.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by RKO2004
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
Ciara too brolic for all that anyway.
i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
It wasn't that good now.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by RKO2004
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
Ciara too brolic for all that anyway.
i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
Originally Posted by RKO2004
It wasn't that good now.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by RKO2004
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
Ciara too brolic for all that anyway.
i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
Some females just do NOT look right doing certain stuff. Ciara is one of those girls that needs NOT to be going overboard. Its like if Candace Parker was twerking on youtube,
Originally Posted by RKO2004
It wasn't that good now.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by RKO2004
The same thing I said about Ciara a while back. That ride video or whichever it was, she was overly trying too hard to become a sex symbol.Originally Posted by mytmouse76
Originally Posted by RavageBX
As appreciated as the gratuitous mass is, she is going to extraordinary lengths to +!%! herself out. Like those shorts seemed mad inappropriate for a tv performance.
as a girl i didnt want to say it and sound like a hater but i completely agree that it was to much for tv...almost the whole thing was out
Ciara too brolic for all that anyway.
i had multiple orgasms watching that video....kill yourself.
Some females just do NOT look right doing certain stuff. Ciara is one of those girls that needs NOT to be going overboard. Its like if Candace Parker was twerking on youtube,
Of course it is an opinion.Originally Posted by finnns2003
I'm not disagreeing but you're stating an opinion. Not fact. There is a difference.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Nothing about her body is worth looking twice at. Nothing. She isn't a head turner. Cute faces aren't commanders of a room, nice bodies are. She doesn't have that.
LOL @ Them being thick.Originally Posted by knightngale
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.
Of course it is an opinion.Originally Posted by finnns2003
I'm not disagreeing but you're stating an opinion. Not fact. There is a difference.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Nothing about her body is worth looking twice at. Nothing. She isn't a head turner. Cute faces aren't commanders of a room, nice bodies are. She doesn't have that.
LOL @ Them being thick.Originally Posted by knightngale
Yeah her legs are thick in a good way and long as well.
thisOriginally Posted by DunkNForce
she's could get it RAW
thisOriginally Posted by DunkNForce
she's could get it RAW