(This thread has taken an interesting turn though.)
I want to make clear, by no means am I trying to say that simply because he takes and misses some wild end of Q or shot clock shots should he be absolved from the FG% question entirely. No question he should be told to tone down on shots at times. No doubt. But also remember, he played under a coach that absolutely controlled everything with his team, and he in fact did back Kobe several times on shot selection. Call me crazy, but Phil's word means more to me than a lot of folks in here. Now, the flip side to that could be Phil didn't want to piss Kobe off, etc etc. True, duly noted. But one way or another, if Phil was pissed about the shots Kobe was taking, he would make it known somehow. Thru media, other players, other coaches, Jeanie Buss, somebody. Phil mastered that stuff.
(Note, I mean as a whole, please don't quote Phil for a single game or something like that, I mean over the course of years coaching him)
But my main point to the FG% part is why is THAT stat, of ALL of the stats that Kobe has amassed mean so damn much suddenly? MJ is 6, 30, 72, 63, 5, 6. Numbers that matter in a grand scheme. Nowhere, and I mean no where do I ever see anyone mention MJ's shooting percentage.
But with Kobe, we want to use that to the nth degree to discredit him? I don't buy that. Fair criticism, sure, absolutely, be all end all number that knocks Kobe down from #__ all time to mid 20's or 30's or whatever, no, no way.
*This is going to be bad.*
This morning on Dan Patrick show, Dan interviews Stacey King. Former Bull, played with Mike, now a broadcaster. King mentioned that MJ is THEE guy against all are compared to who, he is the best player to play, the model. No question.
Dan asked him, if there was no MJ, would Kobe be the model then? King said yes. But sorry, there is an MJ, so it is what it is.
Now, I know that will lead to "HE'S OVERRATED, SEE? SEE? SEE?!!!!!"
They were not saying Kobe is greater than Kareem, or Russell, or whomever as in ranked #2 all time, they were talking the mold, the guy that could do everything on the court, whereas Shaq isn't reboundin, runnin down court, takin you off the dribble and drainin 3's on you. The point is, where some of you have him with Kidd, Pierce, JR Smith, Tony Parker, etc, guys who work in the industry, that have followed the NBA for 50+ years, or 40+ in King's case, and have played the game, they have Kobe much higher than that.
If he's "overrated" because his field goal percentage isn't as clean as some other guys, and he played with Shaq, then I'm sorry, that doesn't hold water compared to all of the accomplishments he has amassed along the way.
JD, while you're here, would you know where to find an end of clock shooting statistic? Not just end of game tho, like end of Q1, halftime, etc. Where would I even look for that? Last 10 seconds of a quarter dot come?