- Jun 20, 2014
- 5,082
- 7,590
For some people if is already are lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For some people if is already are lol
Seems like antibody testing needs to return. That never really popped up in my parts. Not to say chipping is necessarily needed but with technology today, a true vaccine/health database has to be around or in the words.This is actually an important discussion we need to have as a society about what "immunity" really means. I would argue that if vaccine passports (or similar) are going to be implemented, we should also be thinking about what it means for those who have recovered from the virus. If nothing else, they should probably be considered exempt from vaccination for a predetermined period (3-6 months?) if they can prove they have developed a robust immune response through antibody and/or T cell testing.
Doctor challenges UC system’s vaccine mandate, saying he is ‘naturally immune’ to COVID-19
Lawsuit from a UC Irvine professor of psychiatry alleges that treating those who have contracted COVID-19 differently from the fully vaccinated, when both have immunity, is unconstitutional.www.ocregister.com
It's not that antibody testing ever left, it was just never part of the US strategy. IMO, it was simply not prioritized because there are no clear guidelines on what antibody level really means IRL. For example, what is the optimal antibody level to determine immunity? Since nobody knows, the government (rightfully) prioritized vaccination. I'm not saying one strategy is right or wrong, but simply that both must be considered. I would never argue that someone who has recently recovered from COVID is less immune than someone who is fully vaccinated, so if vaccine is going to be required for certain activities it makes sense that perhaps recovery from COVID should also be allowable for a certain time period when antibody levels are likely high. I also understand that recent studies point to the fact that those who have recovered from infection are still 2.5x more likely to be reinfected than those who are fully vaccinated. I have heard that some countries take prior infection into account, but I don't have all the details.Seems like antibody testing needs to return. That never really popped up in my parts. Not to say chipping is necessarily needed but with technology today, a true vaccine/health database has to be around or in the words.
Upon vaccination, they didn’t really care or ask if I had covid. With so many non symptom cases, youd think they would test for antibodies before giving the vaccine. But they must know something that they’re not vocalizing with us.
and these anti vax folks who are the most vocal and now dying, are they choosing to go out and do activities that are the biggest risk around? Are they licking door knobs. It can’t all be masks, right? We have a guy who’s on a school board who defied the states school mask mandate and was subsequently suspended (The whole board was). Now he’s fighting for us life in ICU with covid.
This is actually an important discussion we need to have as a society about what "immunity" really means. I would argue that if vaccine passports (or similar) are going to be implemented, we should also be thinking about what it means for those who have recovered from the virus. If nothing else, they should probably be considered exempt from vaccination for a predetermined period (3-6 months?) if they can prove they have developed a robust immune response through antibody and/or T cell testing.
Doctor challenges UC system’s vaccine mandate, saying he is ‘naturally immune’ to COVID-19
Lawsuit from a UC Irvine professor of psychiatry alleges that treating those who have contracted COVID-19 differently from the fully vaccinated, when both have immunity, is unconstitutional.www.ocregister.com
This sounds like a disguised anti-vaxx lawsuit. Also, the current protocol is to have post covid infected people get the vaccine 90 days after recovery (if treated with monoclonal antibiotics). The article referring to him writing in the Wall Street Journal (Rupert Murdoch owned paper) about this cements the point. So much bad judgment on display that will definitely effect his future career path.
Is that 90 day waiting period an official policy, a recommendation, or just something that certain vaccination centers follow? I do know some people who have waited at their doctor's recommendation and others who did not and got it as soon as their symptoms subsided. If it's an official policy, it would make sense that those who can prove they are in that 90 day waiting period should be exempt from vaccine mandates temporarily.
It’s on the CDC website:
The 90 day wait is only for those who get treatment.
Probably went to the same debate school Ninjahood went to.In it, he cites an article claiming it suggests that naturally acquired covid immunity may be “more robust” than vaccine immunity. I went through the entire article and could not find any reference to that. The authors never even come close to comparing natural versus vaccine acquired immunity.
Probably went to the same debate school Ninjahood went to.
Good luck. We’re requiring vaccination for patrons at my state fair (but workers are exempt. They can just test negative lol).We’re all about to get it here with the state fair.
vaxxed or nah
Oh yeah, there is a vaccine stand.
It's the same ones that go to white lives matter rallies.