- Jul 16, 2002
- 30,786
- 5,784
It's funny how the knicks always go after the athletes in their prime but could only get them when they're "over the hill/ has beens"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
+1Originally Posted by pr0phecy718
@ grant hill possibly joining the knicks now
It's funny how the knicks always go after the athletes in their prime but could only get them when they're "over the hill/ has beens"
Source: Lee asked the Grizzlies for $60 million
July 2, 2009, 11:20 AM
Jeff Zelevansky/Icon SMI
An executive with knowledge of David Lee's trade talks with Memphis tells me, Lee's agent asked for $60 million over five years. Memphis was prepared to offer Lee $40 million over five years. But when they heard the initial asking price, they decided to trade instead for ex-Knick Zach Randolph. Lee's agent, Mark Bartelstein, could not immediately reached for comment.
This is good news for the Knicks, who may be willing to go four years for somewhere between $28 and $32 million. However, Bartelstein is one of the best agents in the business for a reason. As he mentioned to me yesterday, this situation could become complicated and a sign-and-trade could happen.
Toronto reportedly may be an option for Lee, but Bartelstein is going to have to be creative in a dry market.
especially if its OKC's first rounderOriginally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Lee Sign and Trade , get a 1st rounder for next
The Mavericks and Knicks are both preparing three-year offers for Jason Kidd.
Dallas is prepared to offer $25 million over three seasons.
New York has been reluctant to add any additional salary past the upcoming season, but might make an exception for Kidd.
3 year offer for Kidd. Come the %!!$ on. Hopefully he will stay in Dallas which i think he will cause he likes it there and Cuban willreportedly get him more than the MLE.
%#% is this Kidd and Grant Hill nonsense. Lets get younger i dont want these over the hill dudes. Hill makes NO sense whatsoever. If we got him itd be for oneyear and were not a contender, nd it just takes away time from players that need to develop because they are part of our future like Will and Gallo.
And how the %!!$ do the Cavs have that much cap space to sign all these dudes? They just traded for @#%%$%$ Shaq
WordddOriginally Posted by KingFoamNYC
I would cry if the knicks sign kidd to a 3 year deal... wat the hell are they thinking? We need ramon sessions
We cant match that even if we wanted to (thank god). People need to understand Knicks are over cap right now, all we can offer is the MLE nothingmore.Originally Posted by Woodside718
Mavs offered Kidd around 9 million, no way we match that if we are sticking to our 2010 plans. Unless Donnie gets kidd to sign for the cheap because he knows something that we don't....