- Nov 27, 2007
- 3,023
- 123
^
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"I haven't spoken to Minnesota, I will," Walsh said. "I don't know what's going on there. He took a lot of point guards so I want to ask him, 'Why did you do that?' In a way that kind of helped us because that left us with two players that were, in our mind, really good players. I just want to find out."
That's what I'm talking about.\
Well, I was comfortable with letting them both go anyway, so I have absolutely no problem with moving both for Rubio.Originally Posted by Supafly122
This guy better put up John Stockton numbers, Lee and Nate? You know the offers we had for Lee?
I don't want a combo to be traded for Rubio, because we'll need someone to move with Eddy Curry.Originally Posted by HarlemToTheBronx
Well, I was comfortable with letting them both go anyway, so I have absolutely no problem with moving both for Rubio.Originally Posted by Supafly122
This guy better put up John Stockton numbers, Lee and Nate? You know the offers we had for Lee?
But the problem arises when we have to make contracts match. Is Minnesota far enough under the cap to just take one one of either Nate or Lee's contracts?
I can understand that...but I feel like, if Eddy gets on the court, we'd be able to move him at the deadline since his contract only has oneyear remaining.Originally Posted by Supafly122
I don't want a combo to be traded for Rubio, because we'll need someone to move with Eddy Curry.Originally Posted by HarlemToTheBronx
Well, I was comfortable with letting them both go anyway, so I have absolutely no problem with moving both for Rubio.Originally Posted by Supafly122
This guy better put up John Stockton numbers, Lee and Nate? You know the offers we had for Lee?
But the problem arises when we have to make contracts match. Is Minnesota far enough under the cap to just take one one of either Nate or Lee's contracts?