- Jul 6, 2003
- 539
- 323
I might have my priorities messed up, havent got pulled over thoughBro get that registration taken care of.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I might have my priorities messed up, havent got pulled over thoughBro get that registration taken care of.
IIRC, these aren’t based on the OG Foambs but the ones in the old ad specifically,
The groves do go up higher than OG.
IIRC, these aren’t based on the OG Foambs but the ones in the old ad specifically,
The groves do go up higher than OG.
People will complain all day long that the ‘24s aren’t like the OGs, ‘07s, and ‘17s, but what if that was never Nike’s goal for this specific release?
I want this kind of luck.I might have my priorities messed up, havent got pulled over though
Man I’m trying not to double up myself.Impulse double up,hit my size 13 on Snkrs and stopped by shoepalace while making some deliveries at work just to see if they had them and couldnt resist.
Depends on context. If it's meant to be a re-imagined of sorts, no problem but it would be fair to advertise it as such.People will complain all day long that the ‘24s aren’t like the OGs, ‘07s, and ‘17s, but what if that was never Nike’s goal for this specific release?
Nike did that with this years Military Blue 4's as well by calling them "Industrial Blue". Not sure why they decided to change the names up.I hate that they call them "international blue" instead of something like "dark neon." It kind of threw me off a bit.
Can someone point out the differences in foams though? Is there a pic I can look at? I'm struggling! lol
Exactly what I was thinking. That’s a significant difference.No way they fit 1.5 size difference .
Well, I did say that I wanted a snug fit so I went with a size 10 but a 10.5 was also good. That being said, indeed, I might have misspoken, I would not recommand a 1.5 size drop in most cases.Exactly what I was thinking. That’s a significant difference.
Only thing I think Nike wants is to regain control of this sector of the market back from resellers. I think we over estimate how important a same day sell out is for Nike. They have insane margins even on a model like this. I think unless it's a major collaboration or a special release it matters way more to us than to them if it sells out immediately.There were like 5-6 sites that I seen that had 11.5 and up available and those are the sizes gone first. For a shoe like this to still have stock online, that’s def not what Nike wanted. Bet there will be a lot of restocks too from returns. Already a few in here regret buying .
This is what I keep thinking when I see people pass based on comparisons to previous retros. I'm sure Nike's design team hates us . The whole roll out was about it homaging this advertisement and we are totally disregarding that and comparing them to everything BUT the ad .IIRC, these aren’t based on the OG Foambs but the ones in the old ad specifically,
The groves do go up higher than OG.
Have you grown/weight fluctuations, etc. had any injuries to your ankles/feet? Not saying Nike hasn't changed the sizing but over a 10-15 year span these things can make a differenceUnlike the 2015-2017 Foams release, this mold runs kind of big to me. My 2009-2012 Foams are a size 10.5, the 2015-2017 run, a size 11/11.5. I was hesitating between a size 10 and 10.5 for this release. I chose a size size 10 since I wanted a tighter fit.
As shown of the pictures above, I can attest that the 2017 has a "lighter" shade of blue compared to the 2024 retro and a higher cut.
I'll let the OGs decide which version is closer to the 1997 OG run. I was way too young back then and I doubt Foams were even available in Montreal back then.
‘89 Military 4s were the only 4s I had. Old man was a stickler for buying stuff on base because of the no tax. Pissed me off as 7th/8th grader. But now I do the same **** lol.This is what I keep thinking when I see people pass based on comparisons to previous retros. I'm sure Nike's design team hates us . The whole roll out was about it homaging this advertisement and we are totally disregarding that and comparing them to everything BUT the ad .
It reminds me of the military Blue 4 retro this year with everyone comparing them to previous retros instead of the OG (which 99% of modern sneaker heads have never seen or touched or worn) which is what Nike was aiming for. I'd definitely be annoyed by us
We need the day ones. Definitely not as obsessed with sneakers as I was when I was younger but I don't see myself ever abandoning sneakers.‘89 Military 4s were the only 4s I had. Old man was a stickler for buying stuff on base because of the no tax. Pissed me off as 7th/8th grader. But now I do the same **** lol.
Paid for the OGs with a check, hoping my scholarship money would hit my account back then. Dope to see they get retroed (regardless of shape, color, etc…), but to be there when they first dropped, was mad different. Old dawgs catch a lot of flack for being in the game this long, but there’s a difference of seeing things day one and knowing nothing but retros.
When I hear some of these kids trying to tell me something about a sneaker and it sounds like they’ve been rehearsing for a presidential debate, I keep it movin. If you didn’t know Memphis State/Orlando Penny, then we ain’t talkin about **** .We need the day ones. Definitely not as obsessed with sneakers as I was when I was younger but I don't see myself ever abandoning sneakers.