- 985
- 10
smh... @ the youtube video
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by IsTaYrOcKInJs
This video is probably the only one the really captures the animals in full effect
http://www.youtube.com/wa...SbfZj2Mg&feature=related
-Defensless
-Wounded
-Surrenderred
-Did not pose a threat
-Cleary Crying
-Asked for life to be spared
Look I understand he was a "monster" but what just cause do the "freedom fighters" have.
He was was injured paraded on the street. Already wounded he got the crap beat out of him, people were yanking his hair out and stomping him out. Haymakers were thrown. He is crying for mercy. he falls to the ground and gets
shot in the head?
Ruthless
Savage
Where is his fair shake in trial?
I understand he wasnt the image of a man who valued human life but "freedom fighters"?? really
And yeah Im mad. I hope his son Seif al-islam comes through in the cut and murks all these fools.
Im mad!
Originally Posted by IsTaYrOcKInJs
This video is probably the only one the really captures the animals in full effect
http://www.youtube.com/wa...SbfZj2Mg&feature=related
-Defensless
-Wounded
-Surrenderred
-Did not pose a threat
-Cleary Crying
-Asked for life to be spared
Look I understand he was a "monster" but what just cause do the "freedom fighters" have.
He was was injured paraded on the street. Already wounded he got the crap beat out of him, people were yanking his hair out and stomping him out. Haymakers were thrown. He is crying for mercy. he falls to the ground and gets
shot in the head?
Ruthless
Savage
Where is his fair shake in trial?
I understand he wasnt the image of a man who valued human life but "freedom fighters"?? really
And yeah Im mad. I hope his son Seif al-islam comes through in the cut and murks all these fools.
Im mad!
Originally Posted by Alchemiss
Originally Posted by IsTaYrOcKInJs
This video is probably the only one the really captures the animals in full effect
http://www.youtube.com/wa...SbfZj2Mg&feature=related
-Defensless
-Wounded
-Surrenderred
-Did not pose a threat
-Cleary Crying
-Asked for life to be spared
Look I understand he was a "monster" but what just cause do the "freedom fighters" have.
He was was injured paraded on the street. Already wounded he got the crap beat out of him, people were yanking his hair out and stomping him out. Haymakers were thrown. He is crying for mercy. he falls to the ground and gets
shot in the head?
Ruthless
Savage
Where is his fair shake in trial?
I understand he wasnt the image of a man who valued human life but "freedom fighters"?? really
And yeah Im mad. I hope his son Seif al-islam comes through in the cut and murks all these fools.
Im mad!
Seriously bro? What about all the people he either directly or indirectly murdered or all of the lives he ruined? You think he had one ounce of sympathy for them? cared if they were ever defenseless or wanted their lives to be spared? Live by the gun, die by the gun.
Those he relentlessly killed indirectly or directly under his iron fist rule are not to be forgotten. Saying you do not agree with the way Gaddafi was killed is not saying you are an apologist for him. It is just to point out that despite being dictators or war criminals, they have to be appointed and tried by the International Court of Law. Who is anyone to kill and put the law and matter into their own hands without a fair and just trial? Yes, he didn't do that to his people, BUT the people who want "democracy" and a new Libya should be BETTER than that, and on higher morality ground. These people were acting nothing short of uncivilized and barbaric. Who are they to have the right to play judge, jury & executioner? By the way, like not these rebels in this war are any better. Very few news outlets were highlighting the brutal crimes committed by the rebels against their fellow Libyans (ie. lootings and the killings against black Africans in Libya such as the Tuareg).Originally Posted by Alchemiss
Seriously bro? What about all the people he either directly or indirectly murdered or all of the lives he ruined? You think he had one ounce of sympathy for them? cared if they were ever defenseless or wanted their lives to be spared? Live by the gun, die by the gun.
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
Those he relentlessly killed indirectly or directly under his iron fist rule are not to be forgotten. Saying you do not agree with the way Gaddafi was killed is not saying you are an apologist for him. It is just to point out that despite being dictators or war criminals, they have to be appointed and tried by the International Court of Law. Who is anyone to kill and put the law and matter into their own hands without a fair and just trial? Yes, he didn't do that to his people, BUT the people who want "democracy" and a new Libya should be BETTER than that, and on higher morality ground. These people were acting nothing short of uncivilized and barbaric. Who are they to have the right to play judge, jury & executioner? By the way, like not these rebels in this war are any better. Very few news outlets were highlighting the brutal crimes committed by the rebels against their fellow Libyans (ie. lootings and the killings against black Africans in Libya such as the Tuareg).Originally Posted by Alchemiss
Seriously bro? What about all the people he either directly or indirectly murdered or all of the lives he ruined? You think he had one ounce of sympathy for them? cared if they were ever defenseless or wanted their lives to be spared? Live by the gun, die by the gun.
It is unsettling when someone's unsavoury past is cited as justification for their barbaric death. A trial, conviction & punishment would have been a better start for a new Libya. What kind of people might be in charge of Libya tomorrow with these kind of barbarians? Whatever happened to having a court of law, providing due evidence and then punishing a culprit? To start off on the right foot, isn’t a fair judiciary an integral part of a democracy? They are no better than him and basically just did what he would have done as a dictator, yet they are fighting against that. Under international law, what these men did is a war crime.
People only seem to recognise human rights and justice when it suits them.It is about leading example to instead follow true justice. Those men in the video were acting barbaric, no different than what he used to do to his people. How are they any better? At that point, he was not a threat anymore and defenseless. It is a dangerous thing once you kill just for vengeance, and you play as executioner into your own hands. What precedent is that setting?
This killing of Gaddafi is a defeat to international law. Absolute perversion of the system.
Originally Posted by cRazy dav0
Originally Posted by 1C3M4M
2-0
smh @ all of this
Originally Posted by IsTaYrOcKInJs
This video is probably the only one the really captures the animals in full effect
http://www.youtube.com/wa...SbfZj2Mg&feature=related
-Defensless
-Wounded
-Surrenderred
-Did not pose a threat
-Cleary Crying
-Asked for life to be spared
Look I understand he was a "monster" but what just cause do the "freedom fighters" have.
He was was injured paraded on the street. Already wounded he got the crap beat out of him, people were yanking his hair out and stomping him out. Haymakers were thrown. He is crying for mercy. he falls to the ground and gets
shot in the head?
Ruthless
Savage
Where is his fair shake in trial?
I understand he wasnt the image of a man who valued human life but "freedom fighters"?? really
And yeah Im mad. I hope his son Seif al-islam comes through in the cut and murks all these fools.
Im mad!
It is unsettling when someone's unsavoury past is cited as justification for their barbaric death
Disagree...first, murdering innocent people is simply summed up as "unsavory"? Stop it. Sure a trial by International Law SOUNDS good, but on that day, those people unleashed barbaric savagery. It's more like you got what you had coming.
Bingo.Originally Posted by Alchemiss
Live by the gun, die by the gun.
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
Originally Posted by AG 47
Originally Posted by IsTaYrOcKInJs
This video is probably the only one the really captures the animals in full effect
http://www.youtube.com/wa...SbfZj2Mg&feature=related
-Defensless
-Wounded
-Surrenderred
-Did not pose a threat
-Cleary Crying
-Asked for life to be spared
Look I understand he was a "monster" but what just cause do the "freedom fighters" have.
He was was injured paraded on the street. Already wounded he got the crap beat out of him, people were yanking his hair out and stomping him out. Haymakers were thrown. He is crying for mercy. he falls to the ground and gets
shot in the head?
Ruthless
Savage
Where is his fair shake in trial?
I understand he wasnt the image of a man who valued human life but "freedom fighters"?? really
And yeah Im mad. I hope his son Seif al-islam comes through in the cut and murks all these fools.
Im mad!
Wow...you must have known the guy. If you the big bad man, killing people just for fun....you don't think that's going to catch up to you eventually?
And you think just because he said he was sorry or shed a few tears when he was captured that it was going to be all good? The people were just going to forget?
It is unsettling when someone's unsavoury past is cited as justification for their barbaric death
Disagree...first, murdering innocent people is simply summed up as "unsavory"? Stop it. Sure a trial by International Law SOUNDS good, but on that day, those people unleashed barbaric savagery. It's more like you got what you had coming.
So the answer to barbarism, is even more barbarism?
For those people? Apparently so.
Originally Posted by AG 47
He should have been treated with more dignity and had a fair and just trial to you. You can sit here and type all day about what he should have happened or what should not have happened, but the fact is that his past caught up with him. You bring up International Law as if it mattered to the people who found him. Pure democracy is a form of democracy in which the laws are made directly by the people. What we just witnessed wasn't International Law or ICC justice, it was street justice. An eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth in it's most savagest form. Is it right? No, but I understand.
And you ask the question,So the answer to barbarism, is even more barbarism?
Originally Posted by prymone
Originally Posted by Jello B Afro
oh boy all the unemployed NT conspiracy wackos are starting to wake up
got em'
Originally Posted by I FR3SH I
@ the NY Post cover