- 771
- 67
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2013
I was almost tempted after taking a look at the link, but I'll try my luck on RD.
Air Jordan 5 Retro 'Fire Red' 2013 Vol: No 23
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by shoecago,
- Start date
- 703
- 59
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
i'm surprised these aren't at $170, seems like most retros released now all receive price bumps but these.. either way I'll take em
- 1,277
- 28
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
I'm amazed at how people can afford all these jordan releases, nothing ever sits out here in socal. I'm guessing this will be another difficult release
- 4,289
- 1,089
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
Disposable income
- 1,329
- 24
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
Half size smaller for sure
pre order live on www.shopwithdeeaye.com use code NTMLK for 20.00 off all orders through monday
Last edited:
- 287
- 863
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
just watched this it has the "TWENTYTHIRTEEN" message just like they did on last year's 4s
- 1,508
- 286
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2012
I said I was copping these, but to be honest I was still a little iffy. After seeing that on foot, I'm not looking back these arejust watched this it has the "TWENTYTHIRTEEN" message just like they did on last year's 4s
- 9,945
- 7,138
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2005
glad the hi tongue is back. will cop.
- 180
- 20
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
crack on feetjust watched this it has the "TWENTYTHIRTEEN" message just like they did on last year's 4s
- 602
- 79
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
Anybody know why these still aren't showing up on the launch locator on footlocker?
- 703
- 59
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
on feet look dope
- 5,315
- 8,569
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
Ummm, my logic here: I dont do white based Jordans like that., so If i would have bought either one of those 2 from last year like i was going to, I wouldnt blink at the V's this year. I don't buy every jordan release either so even though they came out last year, its only last year. The releveance is, a better white based jordan came out a year later and i'm happy I passed on the other white based ones last year. I can discuss passing jordans from 10 years ago and in this sneaker culture, it would still be relevant, because cats collect old @$! sneakers as well... yadda yadda yadda
No question is stupid though, thanks for asking my dude
- 382
- 115
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
Wow def copping these
- 823
- 287
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
I'm bored going to pick these up now.
- 155
- 26
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2013
Yeah I'm with you too..I prefer black based Retros.. IMO black looks better, always .
They are easier to take care of as well.
The only White sneaker on my list this year is the Grape Vs..but I'm still gonna try to cop these on RD if I don't succeed then no biggie
- 1,700
- 498
- Joined
- May 31, 2011
As of right now these are NOT a Twitter link only release on NDC. All of the BHM shoes are though.
- 823
- 287
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
Went to the store to buy them there only accepting cash, guess get them on RD.
- 7,678
- 9,265
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
I can see preferring black shoes, although I feel white CWs are often a little more versatile as far as what I can wear them with. Regardless, this should be an extremely easy pickup. In fact, I think anything not limited this year SHOULD be easy pickups just due to the crazy pace of the release schedule. By the time we reach Feb 16 there will have been 16 retros dropped in a 10 week stretch. I don't think you can find a time like this in the history of this brand (even the CDPs trickled out slower). That's why the 1's and XIII's were limited in up front numbers (though I still think these weren't extremely hard). The last thing Nike wants people thinking is that it's an "easy cop", because that decreases incentive to purchase up front for some, as the demand seems to set the resale price. "Oh I missed out, oh well I'll come back to these for $30 over retail later". My guess is these only resell for $200-$210 though.
Last edited:
- 378
- 20
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
The higher tongue looks great with jeans 
- 7,139
- 1,708
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
To me, he is one of the best reviewers on YT.
Very detailed, sort of a tell-it-like-it-is guy, and I respect that.
+1
- 3,105
- 2,215
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
Is it safe to say these run big then? That's what he said in the video review. I may just go with my TTS however, people were telling me WC4s and Bred 13s ran big, they all fit perfect to me in my TTS. I know everyone's feet fit different.
Last edited:
- 873
- 212
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2012
These will be copped sat..
- 5,486
- 5,710
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I really wanted to pass on these but V's just look so damn nice!!!
- 5,486
- 5,710
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
I always get an 11 in every J except the XI's. I'm kind of in between an 11-11.5, and it has worked out pretty well for me. I think if anything, most J's run TTS to a tad big.
- 3,105
- 2,215
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
Appreciate it the assurance. Just looked back couple pages just hearing it runs .5 big. But think imma stay with my TTS and see how that goes. For me, the only shoe I went .5 down are for the Jordan 7s. They run slightly more big/loose imo.
Last edited:
