dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,910
- 20,771
2016 SJs look massively better than the trash you just posted in here.
Oh god. Here we go
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2016 SJs look massively better than the trash you just posted in here.
Maybe there’s better pairs than the ones he showed us. Those PL heights look even higher than the higher pl pairs of SJ and wl82.
That was confirmed? I thought they were real. You and Brixxx said they were not. Im sure the guy listened to you guys anyway lol. Honestly struggled on that one.Not anything against you but I did just see you tell someone their fake breds were legit
Maybe there’s better pairs than the ones he showed us. Those PL heights look even higher than the higher pl pairs of SJ and wl82.
Are you being serious right now because the patent leather height looks to be the same
Lol, nothing you said is true. Don’t try and derail the thread. You don’t know me. My very first NT account was created long before 2014.Aquamanjay_ Jaylaw look bro this elitist attitude you have needs to stop. Most of your posts now are contradicting themselves across the Jordan Brand section. I remember when you joined the site you learned the same information as we all did around 2014 and beyond (durabuck, high patent leather on the Jordan 11s, the 1992 Taiwan and Korean pairs of the Jordan 7, and more) which none of us knew until another NT poster said it. Most of the information that you're telling was told to us (members around 2014) by older NTrs. I'm not saying you don't do research yourself but most of it was already on the site before you or I joined. I'm saying this as a friend, you have to stop trying so hard. Peace bro.
Lol, nothing you said is true. Don’t try and derail the thread. You don’t know me. My very first NT account was created long before 2014.
The only “info” I’ve went in on is original 6, 7, and 5 details. In the 7 thread, when the person first mentioned what they found in their own research about the Bordeaux, they posted pics. In my post, I not only expounded upon it, mostly because Netmagnetism had them all in the same place with the same lighting. I even said, “as someone said before”. In the Infrared thread, when I mentioned wanted the OG contrast upper, which I’ve known about since the 2000s, and even owned the 2000 pair, i was told they weren’t originally like that. So, i researched it. And with the help of non active NTers, and some cool og collectors on IG, i found evidence of my claims and posted it. Same happened with the metallic 5 as recent as this week.Aquamanjay_ Jaylaw look bro this elitist attitude you have needs to stop. Most of your posts now are contradicting themselves across the Jordan Brand section. I remember when you joined the site you learned the same information as we all did around 2014 and beyond (durabuck, high patent leather on the Jordan 11s, the 1992 Taiwan and Korean pairs of the Jordan 7, and more) which none of us knew until another NT poster said it. Most of the information that you're telling was told to us (members around 2014) by older NTrs. I'm not saying you don't do research yourself but most of it was already on the site before you or I joined. I'm saying this as a friend, you have to stop trying so hard. Peace bro.
The first dip is what I look at in all the pics lol.
I compared my 2016 sjs and dmp 11 and it's quite the difference.
I prefer the lower patent like on the dmp pair because it looks more sleek to me.
Even if a high patent is true og form I still prefer it slightly lower aesthetically.
I can understand if people prefer that high cut aesthetically or sentimentally tho.