- Aug 20, 2005
- 11,605
- 143
gets me all the time
.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pr0phecy718,
- Start date
gets me all the time
yeeupp
Banned
- Sep 3, 2009
- 5,697
- 166
I do think Jeffries is one of the main reasons we're winning but packaging him with Nate might get rid of his contract
- Jan 27, 2001
- 13,094
- 2,121
- Jan 3, 2008
- 12,102
- 1,410
Of course Donnie will package him with JJ if he can find a suitor.
As far as for a 1st round pick, Nate does not have that kind of value. If he did, he wouldn't be a Knick still.
As far as for a 1st round pick, Nate does not have that kind of value. If he did, he wouldn't be a Knick still.
- Aug 10, 2003
- 26,219
- 19,617
can we trade curry or jeffries for anyone on the blazers? they are short on big men
- Jan 29, 2007
- 7,084
- 45
doesnt dampier have a clause in his contract that makes him an expiring if you take that option before a certain time?
blazers have a ton of wing players, but quite a few are injuerd, as the whole team is.
or maybe allen, no team has the draft pick to offer for nate.
if CJ watson could be worth AJ+draft pick+cash, i would love to hear the reasons why nate isnt. besides height.
blazers have a ton of wing players, but quite a few are injuerd, as the whole team is.
or maybe allen, no team has the draft pick to offer for nate.
if CJ watson could be worth AJ+draft pick+cash, i would love to hear the reasons why nate isnt. besides height.
- Jan 3, 2008
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Jan 29, 2007
- 7,084
- 45
this past off-season when the W's resigned him.
any team looking to make a huge playoff run have nothing to lose. their pick isnt high, and dont have to spend the time to develop a young player.
take it for what its worth.
any team looking to make a huge playoff run have nothing to lose. their pick isnt high, and dont have to spend the time to develop a young player.
take it for what its worth.
- Dec 7, 2006
- 2,805
- 10
jeffries ain't gettin burn so teams can see him..he's getting burn because mike wants him too
if that was the case..eddy would be in the roto too
he's our only role player, and that @!%! is important when everybody else is tryna get their shot off
if that was the case..eddy would be in the roto too
he's our only role player, and that @!%! is important when everybody else is tryna get their shot off
Mister Meaner
formerly super producer j
- Mar 24, 2007
- 20,530
- 10,988
give me this guy
From what I've seen, dude is playing excellent ball as a pg in limited duty.
From what I've seen, dude is playing excellent ball as a pg in limited duty.
- Dec 7, 2006
- 2,805
- 10
bass
- Sep 23, 2004
- 14,132
- 285
*sigh*
- Apr 20, 2007
- 4,058
- 11
word, also D Rose and numerous other quick PGs KILL us when Jeffries is not on them. With his length and athletisism Mike LOVES to throw him onthe opposing teams PGs. Mike isnt playing Jeffries to trade him, hes playing Jeffries to make the playoffs.
- Jan 29, 2007
- 7,084
- 45
I also want DJ.
Well, everyone wants to get rid of contracts, but if curry aint gettin burn, then jefferies is the one that has to go. hes been playing well though i have toadmit, but who knows if him+duhon are going to just drop it down a few notches, like last season. they all know they're not staying long term, who wants tocommit the effort? they cant be playing for a contract, cuz even they themself know they're never going to have a payday like they did before.
and with Tmac, he can be our #1 option, something we lack right now. most of the time, its just a pick and roll to dlee for the final shot.
the wing would be lookin serious though with chandler, gallo and tmac
Well, everyone wants to get rid of contracts, but if curry aint gettin burn, then jefferies is the one that has to go. hes been playing well though i have toadmit, but who knows if him+duhon are going to just drop it down a few notches, like last season. they all know they're not staying long term, who wants tocommit the effort? they cant be playing for a contract, cuz even they themself know they're never going to have a payday like they did before.
and with Tmac, he can be our #1 option, something we lack right now. most of the time, its just a pick and roll to dlee for the final shot.
the wing would be lookin serious though with chandler, gallo and tmac
- May 11, 2004
- 4,524
- 218
ok...i think we've had enough t-mac talk and unrealistic trade scenarios.
yeeupp
Banned
- Sep 3, 2009
- 5,697
- 166
Imagine if bassy does come to Ny ..takes us to the playoffs, we get a superstar next summer... Marbury might just commit that
But anyway i wanna get a W ova the Heats
But anyway i wanna get a W ova the Heats
- Aug 20, 2005
- 11,605
- 143
I haven't seen one ad. or commercial for the knick/heat game on Christmas. This makes me cry and shake my head.
- Aug 10, 2003
- 26,219
- 19,617
i wouldnt mind bassy at all... hes a pure point guard with good court vision
- Jul 16, 2002
- 30,787
- 5,784
we're on national tv right?
410fresh
Banned
- Dec 28, 2007
- 1,232
- 11
LETS GO HEAT! LETS GO HEAT!
- May 11, 2004
- 4,524
- 218
we're on espn. only the big boys play on abc. im actually upset that pierce is out for the orl+bos game. would have liked seeing both teamswith all of their players.Originally Posted by pr0phecy718
we're on national tv right?
- Jul 16, 2002
- 30,787
- 5,784
too bad Nate Robinson wont appear
