- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,326
- 3,613
We like to look at a player's weakness and define a player by that weakness. This doesn't go for Anderson, but any prospect.
When you look at the NBA today, you have so many players making a name for themselves not because of their defense. James Harden just made All-NBA 1st team this year and he's one of the worst perimeter defenders at his position. Kyrie Irving will probably make an All-NBA team within the next few years and he's one of the worst starting defensive PG's in the NBA.
Now, in no way am I comparing Anderson to any of those guys. But, when you start talking about how he can't guard anyone in the league, does that really matter in today's game? If his offensive skillset is good enough, its not going to matter if he can guard a pool stick because people will glorify his offensive game.
But, what I described is how every draft prospect is looked at. You have people giving Parker a hard time because they are saying he can't defend the perimeter because he's too slow. Well, his offensive game is probably the best in the draft and he's capable of making an All-NBA team in his first 5 years WITHOUT improving defensively. We talk about it all the time. Defense is not looked at in the same light as offense anymore.
Now, if Anderson fails on the offensive end, he very well may end up out of the league soon. But, the reason why people do value him as a 1st round pick is because of his offensive skillset. That's the main focus of his game. To say he's going to struggle in the NBA due to one side of the ball that's not even valued highly anymore in today's game doesn't mean much. He just needs the right situation to have success. That's all. He can be a terrible defender his entire career, but as long as he continues to improve his shooting, use his high bball IQ, passing ability and crash the boards, he will be considered a pretty damn good player.
When you look at the NBA today, you have so many players making a name for themselves not because of their defense. James Harden just made All-NBA 1st team this year and he's one of the worst perimeter defenders at his position. Kyrie Irving will probably make an All-NBA team within the next few years and he's one of the worst starting defensive PG's in the NBA.
Now, in no way am I comparing Anderson to any of those guys. But, when you start talking about how he can't guard anyone in the league, does that really matter in today's game? If his offensive skillset is good enough, its not going to matter if he can guard a pool stick because people will glorify his offensive game.
But, what I described is how every draft prospect is looked at. You have people giving Parker a hard time because they are saying he can't defend the perimeter because he's too slow. Well, his offensive game is probably the best in the draft and he's capable of making an All-NBA team in his first 5 years WITHOUT improving defensively. We talk about it all the time. Defense is not looked at in the same light as offense anymore.
Now, if Anderson fails on the offensive end, he very well may end up out of the league soon. But, the reason why people do value him as a 1st round pick is because of his offensive skillset. That's the main focus of his game. To say he's going to struggle in the NBA due to one side of the ball that's not even valued highly anymore in today's game doesn't mean much. He just needs the right situation to have success. That's all. He can be a terrible defender his entire career, but as long as he continues to improve his shooting, use his high bball IQ, passing ability and crash the boards, he will be considered a pretty damn good player.
Last edited: