- 11,948
- 13,463
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2013
I fail to see what's so funny Toronto changed GMs and they turned it around so did the Hawks you guys have had horrid last 3 years
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I fail to see what's so funny Toronto changed GMs and they turned it around so did the Hawks you guys have had horrid last 3 years
Yeah because a different GM would have changed why the past 3 years have been how they were for the better.
Who is actually expecting something to go down this week?
I'm not.
Yeah because a different GM would have changed why the past 3 years have been how they were for the better.
A different GM wouldn't have locked up Kobe for 48 million I know hindsight is 20/20 but how many 1st rounders were given up for Nash a different GM wouldn't have at least tried to get a coach the young guys could actually grow with like Brett Brown and Brad Stevens letting Pau walk for nothing also seems like something every other GM would do your fooling yourselves if you think your management has at least done an above average job.
Wouldn't you rather strike out looking for the next elite one rather than just placing your faith on an average one.
Where would you put him honestlyAverage?! I swear. lol
Top 3Where would you put him honestly
Ok I got you but the laughing emoji makes me think that you guys wouldn't have it any other way but from the get go Nash and Kobe didn't look like a good fit but I understand that those are the types of moves you have to make to get somewhere but I refuse to believe that Byron Scott was the only option available and if there was another he would have been a better choice by default the extra 8 million could've helped but that is just nitpicking.
Top 3
If we are going his history número uno.
Say what you will but his savvy, knowledge of the game and contracts. Plus the moves he pulls are incredible.
Other than like Pat (which is the president) or his Master Jedi (Jerry West) ain't too many in his class.
People just seem to forget his successes real quick when the move doesn't turn out the way it's suppose to. It's ok tho his redemption is coming real soon. And everyone will be singing his graces again. But nobody will mention Jims name lol. Oh that's until something bad happens lol
And you guys are forgetting this is a family run business. The only one in the NBA. So our organization is unique to all other teams.
This is fair, don't know what makes guys think others want our trash, teams really like to spite the Lakers just because of our success.What exact move would you like Mitch AND Jim to make???
I'll wait....Im guessing most in here will say JLin. The same JLin that's scared out of his mind, got his spot taken by an old man and a rookie, an absolutely shell of himself (and himself wasn't that much to begin with. Or how bout a hurt 2nd string big man in JHill. Yea other GMs with brains will actually take that!! Smh
Someone link me to this thread when the trade first went down, I'd like to see who was denouncing the move when it happenedNash was never a good trade. Never.
Trading for 38 year olds is NEVER a wise move.
Multiple picks + 30 million for a 38 year old PG that even while playing was limited to 32 minutes a night and laying on the floor during games.
3 year contract, expecting him to play his age 39-40-41 seasons.
Give me a break.
Someone link me to this thread when the trade first went down, I'd like to see who was denouncing the move when it happenedNash was never a good trade. Never.
Trading for 38 year olds is NEVER a wise move.
Multiple picks + 30 million for a 38 year old PG that even while playing was limited to 32 minutes a night and laying on the floor during games.
3 year contract, expecting him to play his age 39-40-41 seasons.
Give me a break.
http://sneakertalk.yuku.com/topic/3...ead-Vol-Welcome-LA-Steve?page=81#.VOD_WPnF89YSomeone link me to this thread when the trade first went down, I'd like to see who was denouncing the move when it happenedNash was never a good trade. Never.
Trading for 38 year olds is NEVER a wise move.
Multiple picks + 30 million for a 38 year old PG that even while playing was limited to 32 minutes a night and laying on the floor during games.
3 year contract, expecting him to play his age 39-40-41 seasons.
Give me a break.
http://sneakertalk.yuku.com/topic/3...ead-Vol-Welcome-LA-Steve?page=81#.VOD_WPnF89YSomeone link me to this thread when the trade first went down, I'd like to see who was denouncing the move when it happenedNash was never a good trade. Never.
Trading for 38 year olds is NEVER a wise move.
Multiple picks + 30 million for a 38 year old PG that even while playing was limited to 32 minutes a night and laying on the floor during games.
3 year contract, expecting him to play his age 39-40-41 seasons.
Give me a break.