- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,398
- 29,782
No ones saying 90's ball was more entertaining.
Some of us are saying the quality of basketball being played was on a higher level. You had to go through a lot more obstacles physically in order to put that ball in the basket.
How can anyone dispute that?
Entertainment wise? Sure you can argue lob city is more entertaining than bad boys type basketball.
Athletes are stronger, faster, jump higher. We get 10x more highlight plays now than ever before.
So entertainment wise? Sure you can have that... Today's nba gives more highlights for sure.
But how anyone can say the quality of professional basketball, game wise now, is up to par with what teams had to face back then...
That, is very hard to comprehend.
Yeah no, this is all wrong.
1. You can look at the pace numbers, pace was significantly higher in the 90's because it was easier to isolate, defenses weren't as sophisticated, couldn't zone. they took quicker shots becuase it easier to get good looks.
2. You can look at the defensive stats, it was easier to score in the 90's defensive ratings were higher.
physicality =/= better defenses.
You don't think Kobe or Lebron would rather play in the 90's were they could clear out one side of the court and got to work? Tracy had to go in the Lab for a year to figure out how to beat these tom thibbaduea style help defenses when they became prominent.
Last edited: