- 38,931
- 54,908
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
Who?Juve signing a 34 year old striker to pair with their 35 year old striker? Joke club.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Who?Juve signing a 34 year old striker to pair with their 35 year old striker? Joke club.
Absolute mistake by United, Reguilon compliments his Wingers so well, whether it was Vinicius, Ocampos or Fati.Man U goofed with Reguilon. Assistant DOF Flyeed recommended him before the rumors came up. Even with the buyback in place they would have essentially been getting paid to get a massive upgrade at LB for 2 seasons for free/a slight profit when including wages.
This isn’t your typical case with buyback deals where you take an unproven player that needs to be developed. Reguilon is ready to contribute and start. Now instead of being able to link up with Man U’s more talented attackers he’s gotta play for a beta club with the stank of loser on it under a manager who’s made to go up in flames for reality tv. But at least we’re getting rid of Bale.
Absolute mistake by United
Completely disagree.. no way we should take a player on just for you to eventually take him back. Thats some small club mentality. I wanted us to sign him, but not under your demands.. Mans wanted us to agree to a glorified 30 mil/2 year loan and pay his wages.. nahMan U goofed with Reguilon. Assistant DOF Flyeed recommended him before the rumors came up. Even with the buyback in place they would have essentially been getting paid to get a massive upgrade at LB for 2 seasons for free/a slight profit when including wages.
This isn’t your typical case with buyback deals where you take an unproven player that needs to be developed. Reguilon is ready to contribute and start. Now instead of being able to link up with Man U’s more talented attackers he’s gotta play for a beta club with the stank of loser on it under a manager who’s made to go up in flames for reality tv. But at least we’re getting rid of Bale.
A lot can change in two years though. I also saw reguilon was ok with being 2nd choice behind mendy, just marcelo blocking his path. Also why all of a sudden do you demand a clause when this year alone we saw you willing to not enforce one with inter? Too many IFs.. Ask yourself this, Would madrid ever be strong-armed into a transfer with a buy back clause? I highly doubt it.I don't see RM buying Reguilon back if Mendy stays on this track, at worst you get your money back + more. At least you saved face.
I don't see RM buying Reguilon back if Mendy stays on this track, at worst you get your money back + more. At least you saved face.
I hope he doesn't return, he's a starter, Mendy is a starter, you can't keep every player.
I just think he would have flourished with that attacking talent
Miggy on deck too
You can keep players like that for a year at the most, it's not wing or midfield position where you get subbed a lot. These two are too close in age to be giving up significant playing for the sake of being at RM.you need depth, especially at a club like ours