Women Carrying Condoms?

[All Ready]

it all depends on the woman in question

i've been to a chicks house and she had an entire shoe box collection of different condoms in all colors, flavors and sizes and of course off that i realized she was a skeez

then i ran into a chick who had a couple in a drawer because she went to some sort of event where they were giving them out and spreading awareness for safe sex

the only chicks that really try to trap dudes are the ones that have been in long term relationships with the dude in question, women don't be trapping random one night stands. and most of those women tamper with the condoms that the DUDE bought which is why men should be careful where they keep their condoms

lots of different situations can occur from this, it's not cut and dry, this thread is filled with assumptions and lack of experience

 

[Sir San Diego]

Originally Posted by Diego

>I have good hair and I graduated high school.
$+%+@*$ try to trap me allllllll the time. Lets all make a thread and tell each other how much in demand our sperm is.

Oh... you wanna start a thread about sperm? That's all you champ. Go for yours while I sit back and marvel at how you seem to be on a crusade for rats.

But before you continue your attempt to win the hearts and minds of those in denial, think about what you're arguing... You're saying that women don't try to trap men with kids unless they are doctors or financially well off. Do you even believe that?

And before you try to simplify my point into birds wanting to trap dudes with "good hair" (show me where I used that term), I listed examples of why dumb chicks would want to trap a dude and "cute babies" was one of them. If you don't think that happens, I don't know what to tell you besides glad you've never had to deal with a trifling broad.

I guess the world is limited to your experiences only. I'm done with the pissing contest. You win.

EDIT: I just saw that you were in another thread sneak dissing...

Takes a whole lotta heart to do that. Your whole approach on this is dripping with estrogen.

 

[Sir San Diego]

Originally Posted by Diego

>I have good hair and I graduated high school.
$+%+@*$ try to trap me allllllll the time. Lets all make a thread and tell each other how much in demand our sperm is.

Oh... you wanna start a thread about sperm? That's all you champ. Go for yours while I sit back and marvel at how you seem to be on a crusade for rats.

But before you continue your attempt to win the hearts and minds of those in denial, think about what you're arguing... You're saying that women don't try to trap men with kids unless they are doctors or financially well off. Do you even believe that?

And before you try to simplify my point into birds wanting to trap dudes with "good hair" (show me where I used that term), I listed examples of why dumb chicks would want to trap a dude and "cute babies" was one of them. If you don't think that happens, I don't know what to tell you besides glad you've never had to deal with a trifling broad.

I guess the world is limited to your experiences only. I'm done with the pissing contest. You win.

EDIT: I just saw that you were in another thread sneak dissing...

Takes a whole lotta heart to do that. Your whole approach on this is dripping with estrogen.

 

[hazeleyed honey]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Well I got ya, but as far as the courtship thing, if that's considered outdated, what exactly goes on? A handshake? I don't know any woman that turns her nose up at the little things like that.

  

Since the sexual revolution, many of the differences between men and women in courtship and sex have changed or diminished. But, some men and women,due to their own agendas, want to uphold them.  For example, in the 50s, it would be highly unusual for a man not to foot the bill for a restaurant on a date, while nowadays going dutch is common. However, many want to keep the differences and they remain.  Many women for example still expect men to make the initial approach. So should we strive to eliminate or accept such differences?

 

[hazeleyed honey]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Well I got ya, but as far as the courtship thing, if that's considered outdated, what exactly goes on? A handshake? I don't know any woman that turns her nose up at the little things like that.

  

Since the sexual revolution, many of the differences between men and women in courtship and sex have changed or diminished. But, some men and women,due to their own agendas, want to uphold them.  For example, in the 50s, it would be highly unusual for a man not to foot the bill for a restaurant on a date, while nowadays going dutch is common. However, many want to keep the differences and they remain.  Many women for example still expect men to make the initial approach. So should we strive to eliminate or accept such differences?

 

[mytmouse76]

No on is saying it doesn't happen...but as already stated...there are more kids born out of irresponsibility on both parts than shorty not swallowing & using a a turkey baster with her legs in the air

 

[mytmouse76]

No on is saying it doesn't happen...but as already stated...there are more kids born out of irresponsibility on both parts than shorty not swallowing & using a a turkey baster with her legs in the air

 

[capricorn1229]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Well I got ya, but as far as the courtship thing, if that's considered outdated, what exactly goes on? A handshake? I don't know any woman that turns her nose up at the little things like that.

  

Since the sexual revolution, many of the differences between men and women in courtship and sex have changed or diminished. But, some men and women,due to their own agendas, want to uphold them.  For example, in the 50s, it would be highly unusual for a man not to foot the bill for a restaurant on a date, while nowadays going dutch is common. However, many want to keep the differences and they remain.  Many women for example still expect men to make the initial approach. So should we strive to eliminate or accept such differences?

Damn Hazel putting her foot in this one.

I love it.

 

[capricorn1229]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Well I got ya, but as far as the courtship thing, if that's considered outdated, what exactly goes on? A handshake? I don't know any woman that turns her nose up at the little things like that.

  

Since the sexual revolution, many of the differences between men and women in courtship and sex have changed or diminished. But, some men and women,due to their own agendas, want to uphold them.  For example, in the 50s, it would be highly unusual for a man not to foot the bill for a restaurant on a date, while nowadays going dutch is common. However, many want to keep the differences and they remain.  Many women for example still expect men to make the initial approach. So should we strive to eliminate or accept such differences?

Damn Hazel putting her foot in this one.

I love it.

 

[mytmouse76]

^ get em...

& which one you JJB chicks posted this on there? i see you

 

[Sir San Diego]

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

No on is saying it doesn't happen...but as already stated...there are more kids born out of irresponsibility on both parts than shorty not swallowing & using a a turkey baster with her legs in the air

So what's the argument then? I'm saying it happens and one of the response was it only happens when the relationship is with a doctor.

I gave my take on one reason not to trust it and it turned into a reason for Diego to make this his personal issue. I don't get it. So dudes shouldn't be cautious in these situations and just be happy a chick brought the rubbers without thinking of all angles and possibilities?

I don't live in that absolute world, so in the past, I wouldn't trust a chick with a handful of condoms and I don't recommend trusting it to dudes out there getting it in.

 

[mytmouse76]

^ get em...

& which one you JJB chicks posted this on there? i see you

 

[Sir San Diego]

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

No on is saying it doesn't happen...but as already stated...there are more kids born out of irresponsibility on both parts than shorty not swallowing & using a a turkey baster with her legs in the air

So what's the argument then? I'm saying it happens and one of the response was it only happens when the relationship is with a doctor.

I gave my take on one reason not to trust it and it turned into a reason for Diego to make this his personal issue. I don't get it. So dudes shouldn't be cautious in these situations and just be happy a chick brought the rubbers without thinking of all angles and possibilities?

I don't live in that absolute world, so in the past, I wouldn't trust a chick with a handful of condoms and I don't recommend trusting it to dudes out there getting it in.

 

[mytmouse76]

there is no arguement...multiple people mention trapping...another said thats not the majority and the trapping people took it to that level of 'oh it doesn't happen' like i said no one said it doesn't

 

[mytmouse76]

there is no arguement...multiple people mention trapping...another said thats not the majority and the trapping people took it to that level of 'oh it doesn't happen' like i said no one said it doesn't

 

[moneymike88]

Originally Posted by Diego

I have good hair and I graduated high school.
@#*%#+! try to trap me allllllll the time. Lets all make a thread and tell each other how much in demand our sperm is.

I'm 6'4 with broad shoulders...Wimminz STAY askin me to get em pregnant

 

[capricorn1229]

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

^ get em...

& which one you JJB chicks posted this on there? i see you

thegoat121886 did that. He's a mod over there.

 

[capricorn1229]

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

^ get em...

& which one you JJB chicks posted this on there? i see you

thegoat121886 did that. He's a mod over there.

 

[moneymike88]

Originally Posted by Diego

I have good hair and I graduated high school.
@#*%#+! try to trap me allllllll the time. Lets all make a thread and tell each other how much in demand our sperm is.

I'm 6'4 with broad shoulders...Wimminz STAY askin me to get em pregnant

 

[rjones416]

a single woman who carries condoms in her purse is definitely easy and most likely a %+!%. a respectable woman would at least make you wait until you're dating.

 

[rjones416]

a single woman who carries condoms in her purse is definitely easy and most likely a %+!%. a respectable woman would at least make you wait until you're dating.

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Well I got ya, but as far as the courtship thing, if that's considered outdated, what exactly goes on? A handshake? I don't know any woman that turns her nose up at the little things like that.

  

Since the sexual revolution, many of the differences between men and women in courtship and sex have changed or diminished. But, some men and women,due to their own agendas, want to uphold them.  For example, in the 50s, it would be highly unusual for a man not to foot the bill for a restaurant on a date, while nowadays going dutch is common. However, many want to keep the differences and they remain.  Many women for example still expect men to make the initial approach. So should we strive to eliminate or accept such differences?

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Well I got ya, but as far as the courtship thing, if that's considered outdated, what exactly goes on? A handshake? I don't know any woman that turns her nose up at the little things like that.

  

Since the sexual revolution, many of the differences between men and women in courtship and sex have changed or diminished. But, some men and women,due to their own agendas, want to uphold them.  For example, in the 50s, it would be highly unusual for a man not to foot the bill for a restaurant on a date, while nowadays going dutch is common. However, many want to keep the differences and they remain.  Many women for example still expect men to make the initial approach. So should we strive to eliminate or accept such differences?

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

 

[pusha c]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by PUSHA C

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

why are you playing dumb? 
he didn't say ALWAYS looking for sex... she's just more inclined to say yes in that situation which is fact. if you don't agree with that then you are being argumentative for the hell of it

 Like he replied to my post, he is making a correlation that if a woman can't wait on a man to get a condom then she can't control herself,which makes her a +@+!. 

So, basically, carrying around condoms means a woman is ready or willing to have sex. Maybe me using the word always was too much. But, you get my point.

I am just trying to point out that he is making too many assumptions and being judgmental on the get go, because he basically said that a girl with condoms already on her on the first go is a +@+! and can't be considered a "good girl".

I do not see it as more inclined to say yes for carrying them. You guys could be right. I just don't look at that at first. More like just that a girl can be carrying them in case it happens and make no judment on how sexual/promiscuous/inclined to sex she is. It could be that despite her carrying them, most of the time she refuses casual/random sex.

To me, it is no different than when a girl who is single that always takes her BC pills also for precautionary reasons. But, condoms protect from STDs when BC pills don't.

regarding the bolded part.... come on slim, i understand you taking the females side but that just makes no sense lol. who just carries around condoms for the hell of it? if a condom is on your person you WILL be using it in the near future... there's NO OTHER REASON to have it on you correct? thats the point of this thread, talkin about women who carry and use said condoms.
the fact that women ALLOW men to have sex is the major point so if she carries around condoms one can assume that she has sex regularly... how can you fault them? 1+1=2

i'm not hear to make assumptions on !*+# and all that jazz cause 75% of the +#$*#% that call youngins !*+# on here are CLEARLY not smashing BUT if she carries around condoms i would assume that slim regularly has sex and, unfortunately, my opinion of her will go down. 

 

[pusha c]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by PUSHA C

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

why are you playing dumb? 
he didn't say ALWAYS looking for sex... she's just more inclined to say yes in that situation which is fact. if you don't agree with that then you are being argumentative for the hell of it

 Like he replied to my post, he is making a correlation that if a woman can't wait on a man to get a condom then she can't control herself,which makes her a +@+!. 

So, basically, carrying around condoms means a woman is ready or willing to have sex. Maybe me using the word always was too much. But, you get my point.

I am just trying to point out that he is making too many assumptions and being judgmental on the get go, because he basically said that a girl with condoms already on her on the first go is a +@+! and can't be considered a "good girl".

I do not see it as more inclined to say yes for carrying them. You guys could be right. I just don't look at that at first. More like just that a girl can be carrying them in case it happens and make no judment on how sexual/promiscuous/inclined to sex she is. It could be that despite her carrying them, most of the time she refuses casual/random sex.

To me, it is no different than when a girl who is single that always takes her BC pills also for precautionary reasons. But, condoms protect from STDs when BC pills don't.

regarding the bolded part.... come on slim, i understand you taking the females side but that just makes no sense lol. who just carries around condoms for the hell of it? if a condom is on your person you WILL be using it in the near future... there's NO OTHER REASON to have it on you correct? thats the point of this thread, talkin about women who carry and use said condoms.
the fact that women ALLOW men to have sex is the major point so if she carries around condoms one can assume that she has sex regularly... how can you fault them? 1+1=2

i'm not hear to make assumptions on !*+# and all that jazz cause 75% of the +#$*#% that call youngins !*+# on here are CLEARLY not smashing BUT if she carries around condoms i would assume that slim regularly has sex and, unfortunately, my opinion of her will go down.