Women Carrying Condoms?

[hazeleyed honey]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

I understand that,but then again where is the line blurred when all that was made up due to social construction and conditioning? People tend to overlook that societal roles have advanced,progressed, or changed when to it comes to gender. That is what I meant by how double standards can be outdated but some just want to stick to them for their own agendas.

Some of the same men in here implying that there are double standards when it comes to sex and women shouldn't carry condoms and if she does that makes her a ho, are some of the same ones in those NT threads talking about hell no way I will be paying on the first date and that as a grown ++$ woman, she should be paying her own bill. Then they get on women for expecting traditional courtship. They just pick and choose which double standards they want to uphold for their own intentions.



  

 

[hazeleyed honey]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

I understand that,but then again where is the line blurred when all that was made up due to social construction and conditioning? People tend to overlook that societal roles have advanced,progressed, or changed when to it comes to gender. That is what I meant by how double standards can be outdated but some just want to stick to them for their own agendas.

Some of the same men in here implying that there are double standards when it comes to sex and women shouldn't carry condoms and if she does that makes her a ho, are some of the same ones in those NT threads talking about hell no way I will be paying on the first date and that as a grown ++$ woman, she should be paying her own bill. Then they get on women for expecting traditional courtship. They just pick and choose which double standards they want to uphold for their own intentions.



  

 

[User 37837]

It all depends on the quality/caliber of girl you're dealing with. Most of my one night stand chicks have kept them in their purse

. The chicks i've dated don't keep condoms in their room or anything since they weren't having sex like that.

 

[User 37837]

It all depends on the quality/caliber of girl you're dealing with. Most of my one night stand chicks have kept them in their purse

. The chicks i've dated don't keep condoms in their room or anything since they weren't having sex like that.

 

[diego]

Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

No on is saying it doesn't happen...but as already stated...there are more kids born out of irresponsibility on both parts than shorty not swallowing & using a a turkey baster with her legs in the air

So what's the argument then? I'm saying it happens and one of the response was it only happens when the relationship is with a doctor.

I gave my take on one reason not to trust it and it turned into a reason for Diego to make this his personal issue. I don't get it. So dudes shouldn't be cautious in these situations and just be happy a chick brought the rubbers without thinking of all angles and possibilities?

I don't live in that absolute world, so in the past, I wouldn't trust a chick with a handful of condoms and I don't recommend trusting it to dudes out there getting it in.

I think your problem is that I was speaking to you specifically. I may have quoted you but all of my responses were generally speaking.I'm not saying it ONLY happens to doctors or rich dudes but when I'm looking at 5 pages of dudes giving each other e-daps cause they inspect a girls jizz infested mouth or when I see people think it's unacceptable to accept a condom from a female cause clearly she poked holes in it and wants a child, I think it's time for a reality check.Does it happen in the real world to average folk?Occasionally I'm sure it does.5 pages of NTers thinking they're prime candidates for a chick to try to trap them?Lettuce be cereal bros.

 

[diego]

Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

No on is saying it doesn't happen...but as already stated...there are more kids born out of irresponsibility on both parts than shorty not swallowing & using a a turkey baster with her legs in the air

So what's the argument then? I'm saying it happens and one of the response was it only happens when the relationship is with a doctor.

I gave my take on one reason not to trust it and it turned into a reason for Diego to make this his personal issue. I don't get it. So dudes shouldn't be cautious in these situations and just be happy a chick brought the rubbers without thinking of all angles and possibilities?

I don't live in that absolute world, so in the past, I wouldn't trust a chick with a handful of condoms and I don't recommend trusting it to dudes out there getting it in.

I think your problem is that I was speaking to you specifically. I may have quoted you but all of my responses were generally speaking.I'm not saying it ONLY happens to doctors or rich dudes but when I'm looking at 5 pages of dudes giving each other e-daps cause they inspect a girls jizz infested mouth or when I see people think it's unacceptable to accept a condom from a female cause clearly she poked holes in it and wants a child, I think it's time for a reality check.Does it happen in the real world to average folk?Occasionally I'm sure it does.5 pages of NTers thinking they're prime candidates for a chick to try to trap them?Lettuce be cereal bros.

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

Originally Posted by Diego

>I have good hair and I graduated high school.
$+%+@*$ try to trap me allllllll the time. Lets all make a thread and tell each other how much in demand our sperm is.

Oh... you wanna start a thread about sperm? That's all you champ. Go for yours while I sit back and marvel at how you seem to be on a crusade for rats.

But before you continue your attempt to win the hearts and minds of those in denial, think about what you're arguing... You're saying that women don't try to trap men with kids unless they are doctors or financially well off. Do you even believe that?

And before you try to simplify my point into birds wanting to trap dudes with "good hair" (show me where I used that term), I listed examples of why dumb chicks would want to trap a dude and "cute babies" was one of them. If you don't think that happens, I don't know what to tell you besides glad you've never had to deal with a trifling broad.

I guess the world is limited to your experiences only. I'm done with the pissing contest. You win.

EDIT: I just saw that you were in another thread sneak dissing...

Takes a whole lotta heart to do that. Your whole approach on this is dripping with estrogen.

damb diego... you trippin, my dude.

when one starts to ridicule the other side's argument, i really think they start to doubt their own perspective

there are SEVERAL reasons why a girl would trap a guy... and many of them do really make much sense.

but honestly... how much sense do many women make on a consistent basis, ESPECIALLY the women w/ these mind frames?

there are ones that think logically, and can support decisions with legitimate reasons...

but generally, women think on emotions. we all can agree to this, and even the women in here can concur. they know that they have friends that they look at and think "why is she so emotional" or "what is the reasoning behind the way she's acting?" and cant explain it.

girls will have babies w/ a guy for food stamps, tall babies, athletic babies, cute babies, babies w/ nice hair, babies w/ nice eyes, the guy is a supporter, the guy aint sheet, the guy IS sheet, the guy is going to have options to get other breezys soon, to show other chicks what's hers, and to keep a guy around....

i just named a BUNCH of reasons, right there.... aside from a cat raking in $300k +...

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

Originally Posted by Diego

>I have good hair and I graduated high school.
$+%+@*$ try to trap me allllllll the time. Lets all make a thread and tell each other how much in demand our sperm is.

Oh... you wanna start a thread about sperm? That's all you champ. Go for yours while I sit back and marvel at how you seem to be on a crusade for rats.

But before you continue your attempt to win the hearts and minds of those in denial, think about what you're arguing... You're saying that women don't try to trap men with kids unless they are doctors or financially well off. Do you even believe that?

And before you try to simplify my point into birds wanting to trap dudes with "good hair" (show me where I used that term), I listed examples of why dumb chicks would want to trap a dude and "cute babies" was one of them. If you don't think that happens, I don't know what to tell you besides glad you've never had to deal with a trifling broad.

I guess the world is limited to your experiences only. I'm done with the pissing contest. You win.

EDIT: I just saw that you were in another thread sneak dissing...

Takes a whole lotta heart to do that. Your whole approach on this is dripping with estrogen.

damb diego... you trippin, my dude.

when one starts to ridicule the other side's argument, i really think they start to doubt their own perspective

there are SEVERAL reasons why a girl would trap a guy... and many of them do really make much sense.

but honestly... how much sense do many women make on a consistent basis, ESPECIALLY the women w/ these mind frames?

there are ones that think logically, and can support decisions with legitimate reasons...

but generally, women think on emotions. we all can agree to this, and even the women in here can concur. they know that they have friends that they look at and think "why is she so emotional" or "what is the reasoning behind the way she's acting?" and cant explain it.

girls will have babies w/ a guy for food stamps, tall babies, athletic babies, cute babies, babies w/ nice hair, babies w/ nice eyes, the guy is a supporter, the guy aint sheet, the guy IS sheet, the guy is going to have options to get other breezys soon, to show other chicks what's hers, and to keep a guy around....

i just named a BUNCH of reasons, right there.... aside from a cat raking in $300k +...

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

I understand that,but then again where is the line blurred when all that was made up due to social construction and conditioning? People tend to overlook that societal roles have advanced,progressed, or changed when to it comes to gender. That is what I meant by how double standards can be outdated but some just want to stick to them for their own agendas.

Some of the same men in here implying that there are double standards when it comes to sex and women shouldn't carry condoms and if she does that makes her a ho, are some of the same ones in those NT threads talking about hell no way I will be paying on the first date and that as a grown ++$ woman, she should be paying her own bill. Then they get on women for expecting traditional courtship. They just pick and choose which double standards they want to uphold for their own intentions.



  

double standards still exist, and they always will.

i think the MAJORITY of guys would look at a girl differently if she has a diff box of condoms everytime they see her.

the thing many try to do is tie other parts of NT into an argument w/ a blanket statement... for example "the same cats thats ____ are the same cats that ___", with the second blank contradicting the first.

i believe in courting a chick... you can check my post history, and i think most dudes in here believe there's nothing wrong w/ takin a girl out on a first date. i'm not talkin about spoiling her out the gate, but takin her on a date, and paying for it.

if i take a girl on a first date, we get to the crib, and i got a chance to jump hams...

i get to the crib and she pulls out condoms, i'ma be MAD as hell at myself, cuz i would honestly think that i didnt have to go thru all of that to jump them hams...

why would i think this... cuz SHE GOT CONDOMS.

but if she dont have none, and i dont have none... i'm still gonna think she's easy cuz she was gonna let me jump hams on the first date.... but i'll be less inclined to put her in the JO status.

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

I understand that,but then again where is the line blurred when all that was made up due to social construction and conditioning? People tend to overlook that societal roles have advanced,progressed, or changed when to it comes to gender. That is what I meant by how double standards can be outdated but some just want to stick to them for their own agendas.

Some of the same men in here implying that there are double standards when it comes to sex and women shouldn't carry condoms and if she does that makes her a ho, are some of the same ones in those NT threads talking about hell no way I will be paying on the first date and that as a grown ++$ woman, she should be paying her own bill. Then they get on women for expecting traditional courtship. They just pick and choose which double standards they want to uphold for their own intentions.



  

double standards still exist, and they always will.

i think the MAJORITY of guys would look at a girl differently if she has a diff box of condoms everytime they see her.

the thing many try to do is tie other parts of NT into an argument w/ a blanket statement... for example "the same cats thats ____ are the same cats that ___", with the second blank contradicting the first.

i believe in courting a chick... you can check my post history, and i think most dudes in here believe there's nothing wrong w/ takin a girl out on a first date. i'm not talkin about spoiling her out the gate, but takin her on a date, and paying for it.

if i take a girl on a first date, we get to the crib, and i got a chance to jump hams...

i get to the crib and she pulls out condoms, i'ma be MAD as hell at myself, cuz i would honestly think that i didnt have to go thru all of that to jump them hams...

why would i think this... cuz SHE GOT CONDOMS.

but if she dont have none, and i dont have none... i'm still gonna think she's easy cuz she was gonna let me jump hams on the first date.... but i'll be less inclined to put her in the JO status.

 

[mangudai954]

Originally Posted by I AM THAT DUDE

Sometimes I forget how delusional NTers can be.

Fixed.

Yikes.

 

[mangudai954]

Originally Posted by I AM THAT DUDE

Sometimes I forget how delusional NTers can be.

Fixed.

Yikes.

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

I understand that,but then again where is the line blurred when all that was made up due to social construction and conditioning? People tend to overlook that societal roles have advanced,progressed, or changed when to it comes to gender. That is what I meant by how double standards can be outdated but some just want to stick to them for their own agendas.

Some of the same men in here implying that there are double standards when it comes to sex and women shouldn't carry condoms and if she does that makes her a ho, are some of the same ones in those NT threads talking about hell no way I will be paying on the first date and that as a grown ++$ woman, she should be paying her own bill. Then they get on women for expecting traditional courtship. They just pick and choose which double standards they want to uphold for their own intentions. 

I could definitely understand that. I guess people are gonna do what feels most natural to them. I do all the little courtship things that most guys normally do (or should do), and it really just feels right, like I should be doing that. I've paid for meals, ordered her food, and my girl has done the same, it just really depends on the mood i guess. I do see what you mean about the contradictions though, but not really sure how people could at all just overlook those roles. I think it's really just two extremes --- either the guy is actually being some 1950's stern chauvinist type caveman, or the woman is going overboard with trying to prove she doesn't need anything at all from a man.

  

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey

Originally Posted by Peep Game

If you are asking should we eliminate or accept the differences between a male and a female, that could go a whole different route. I told you I'm all for equality and everything, cause I feel both males and females should be able to make their own rightful decisions about things, but I thought men actually liked to feel like men, and women liked to feel like women? There's a difference between common courtship and standard roles (double standards or not), and what amounts to being no difference at all between men and women. If you eliminate the differences, you're basically eliminating the purpose. If you accept the differences (within reason), then everything's all good. What is perceived as the "norm" isn't oppression or being chauvinist. That gets thrown around way too much.
  

I understand that,but then again where is the line blurred when all that was made up due to social construction and conditioning? People tend to overlook that societal roles have advanced,progressed, or changed when to it comes to gender. That is what I meant by how double standards can be outdated but some just want to stick to them for their own agendas.

Some of the same men in here implying that there are double standards when it comes to sex and women shouldn't carry condoms and if she does that makes her a ho, are some of the same ones in those NT threads talking about hell no way I will be paying on the first date and that as a grown ++$ woman, she should be paying her own bill. Then they get on women for expecting traditional courtship. They just pick and choose which double standards they want to uphold for their own intentions. 

I could definitely understand that. I guess people are gonna do what feels most natural to them. I do all the little courtship things that most guys normally do (or should do), and it really just feels right, like I should be doing that. I've paid for meals, ordered her food, and my girl has done the same, it just really depends on the mood i guess. I do see what you mean about the contradictions though, but not really sure how people could at all just overlook those roles. I think it's really just two extremes --- either the guy is actually being some 1950's stern chauvinist type caveman, or the woman is going overboard with trying to prove she doesn't need anything at all from a man.

  

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Peep Game



  

that avy, fambs...

who;s that??

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Peep Game



  

that avy, fambs...

who;s that??

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by ricky409

Originally Posted by Peep Game



  

that avy, fambs...

who;s that??

...Ice La Fox...before she got implants and started using injections

...she didn't need them.

  

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by ricky409

Originally Posted by Peep Game



  

that avy, fambs...

who;s that??

...Ice La Fox...before she got implants and started using injections

...she didn't need them.

  

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Originally Posted by ricky409

Originally Posted by Peep Game



  

that avy, fambs...

who;s that??

...Ice La Fox...before she got implants and started using injections

...she didn't need them.

  

i kinda like the new Ice La Fox... more sexy

but the old one... she was a dime, looks wise...

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

Originally Posted by ricky409

Originally Posted by Peep Game



  

that avy, fambs...

who;s that??

...Ice La Fox...before she got implants and started using injections

...she didn't need them.

  

i kinda like the new Ice La Fox... more sexy

but the old one... she was a dime, looks wise...

 

[gllahone84]

Ya'll trust em?

Not me.

 

[tr1ll]

Yes.

Hell yes. You never know when %*!% might pop off.