- 1,661
- 81
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
People evolved, they weren't created.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Wr
Ppl have rtoo many fundamental ideological differences to come to a concensus on this issue.
Originally Posted by offbad
Originally Posted by Wr
Ppl have rtoo many fundamental ideological differences to come to a concensus on this issue.
is spelling one of them?
thou art irate?Originally Posted by Wr
Feel better about yourself? Like I honestly want to know what you or this thread gains from what you just said. What do you reallywant to say, or are you just passive aggressive?Originally Posted by offbad
is spelling one of them?Originally Posted by Wr
Ppl have rtoo many fundamental ideological differences to come to a concensus on this issue.
to 0e3xOriginally Posted by So Nyuh Shi Dae
There's so much wrong with your thought process.Originally Posted by Oe3x
Plants, mammals, and reptiles reproduce
If being gay is natural then how come gay people cannot reproduce?
First lets agree that same sex feelings isn't natural. Why? Because you cannot reproduce from it.
Once this is accepted as a fact... then we can talk about rights and acceptance.
Now lets say being gay wasn't a choice.... lets say you were born gay...
There are people born with feelings for little children, feelings to steal (Kleptomania) , feelings to murder.... we have treatments for them.
But oh... being gay shouldn't be treated because nothing is wrong with being gay. SERIOUSLY?
If gays wants to be accepted cool...
But first have it made officially that being gay is a medical condition... like all the things I listed above.
Being gay is considered "natural" because we observe it all throughout nature. It's not some rare phenomenon that humans invented. Someone has already posted a list of different species that have been seen demonstrating homosexual behavior.
How are "same sex feelings" in any way relevant to reproduction? Regardless of whether you can reproduce or not has no bearing on your "feelings".
You're comparing homosexuality to murder and theft. Take a moment to think about what you're doing here. It's not difficult to understand what's wrong with your comparison here.
Originally Posted by offbad
thou art irate?Originally Posted by Wr
Feel better about yourself? Like I honestly want to know what you or this thread gains from what you just said. What do you reallywant to say, or are you just passive aggressive?Originally Posted by offbad
is spelling one of them?
clearly, not everyone can handle the internet.Originally Posted by Wr
Im not irate. Just wondering why you went through the trouble of waisting bamdwidth to make that reply. Ive never even talked to you in any thread on any issue over anything and you felt the need to quote what I said to point out spelling mistakes? Im not writing peer reviewed articles and im on a phone as it is. Just curious if you thought what you did holds any significance?Originally Posted by offbad
thou art irate?Originally Posted by Wr
Feel better about yourself? Like I honestly want to know what you or this thread gains from what you just said. What do you reallywant to say, or are you just passive aggressive?
Originally Posted by offbad
clearly, not everyone can handle the internet.Originally Posted by Wr
Im not irate. Just wondering why you went through the trouble of waisting bamdwidth to make that reply. Ive never even talked to you in any thread on any issue over anything and you felt the need to quote what I said to point out spelling mistakes? Im not writing peer reviewed articles and im on a phone as it is. Just curious if you thought what you did holds any significance?Originally Posted by offbad
thou art irate?
you talk about "wasting bandwidth" and you continue this banter. well played.
Once again, its OK to hate other people. Its why westboro baptist church and other racist groups can legally exist. Its within their rights to express themselves. I also will PROTECT their right to do so, even though I don't agree with themOriginally Posted by IcyyyESR Two3
looks like i'm way too late for my response to be significant...
it's kind of a paradox. in the US, most people preach being completely tolerant of others, no matter their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc.
we also preach being accepting of what others believe in. but what if people believe in intolerance? what if they choose not to accept the beliefs and rights of people different than them? should we be intolerant of the intolerance of these people? but wouldn't that go against the tolerance that most US citizens adhere to?
Originally Posted by sillyputty
son, why do you have to understand it?Originally Posted by GTEK
but in terms of trying to understand homosexuality it has no place.
most people dont like gays cuz its not how nature intended humans to be
first of all, "most people" arent born with a predisposition to not like gay people......
besides, im not even sure "most people" have a problem with homosexuality
as far as "how nature intended"
please, sir, tell us more of natures intentions......
since you speak from a position of authority on the subject of what nature does and doesnt intend...
Originally Posted by LDJ
Originally Posted by sillyputty
Do not get it. I think most ppl will and disassociate casual sex with marriage. Also the 2 girls comment is different because im pretty sure most ppl are referring to 2 chicks who are attractive, and moreso bi as opposed to 2 chicks that look like rosie odonnell or ellen degeneres.
Originally Posted by CurbYourEnthusiasm
Originally Posted by LDJ
Originally Posted by sillyputty
Do not get it. I think most ppl will and disassociate casual sex with marriage. Also the 2 girls comment is different because im pretty sure most ppl are referring to 2 chicks who are attractive, and moreso bi as opposed to 2 chicks that look like rosie odonnell or ellen degeneres.
son, do you even know how dumb you sound right now?
i pray you are making a corny joke which cant be articulated on the internet...
Originally Posted by LDJ
CurbYourEnthusiasm wrote:
LDJ wrote:
Do not get it. I think most ppl will and disassociate casual sex with marriage. Also the 2 girls comment is different because im pretty sure most ppl are referring to 2 chicks who are attractive, and moreso bi as opposed to 2 chicks that look like rosie odonnell or ellen degeneres.
because i cannot understand how a str8 male can say whats attractive cool about 2 attractive woman as oppose to 2 ugly women making out or 2 males making out.
if i see beyonce and iuno halle berry making out yes thats attractive, as it would be to most str8 males. monique and precious um... not so much. um tom cruise and charlie sheen um i dont think so.
Seriously are you saying you cant see why a str8 man would find 2 woman attractive versus 2 men?
I dont understand how this is dumb. If so then i guess str8 males are dumb because majority of str8 males will find 2 hot woman attractive over 2 males making out.
Because they're attracted to women.
What if women like seeing two dudes make out?
Is that not the same thing?
Why can't women that are attracted to men not like seeing two men make out?
Well i take that back im guessing, seeing as dudes nowadays are wearing women clothes,dyeing hair etc... so i may have to retract that statement.
So if I dye my hair or wear jeans that a COMPANY'S MARKETING DEPARTMENT said was made for women then that makes me gay?
What the hell is wrong with you?
Wow.Originally Posted by sillyputty
Originally Posted by LDJ
CurbYourEnthusiasm wrote:
son, do you even know how dumb you sound right now?
i pray you are making a corny joke which cant be articulated on the internet...
im guessing maybe your homosexual not sure,
because i cannot understand how a str8 male can say whats attractive cool about 2 attractive woman as oppose to 2 ugly women making out or 2 males making out.
if i see beyonce and iuno halle berry making out yes thats attractive, as it would be to most str8 males. monique and precious um... not so much. um tom cruise and charlie sheen um i dont think so.
Seriously are you saying you cant see why a str8 man would find 2 woman attractive versus 2 men?
I dont understand how this is dumb. If so then i guess str8 males are dumb because majority of str8 males will find 2 hot woman attractive over 2 males making out.
Because they're attracted to women.
What if women like seeing two dudes make out?
Is that not the same thing?
Yes it is...ok point.
Why can't women that are attracted to men not like seeing two men make out?
Well i take that back im guessing, seeing as dudes nowadays are wearing women clothes,dyeing hair etc... so i may have to retract that statement.
So if I dye my hair or wear jeans that a COMPANY'S MARKETING DEPARTMENT said was made for women then that makes me gay?
It would put your manhood in question yes it would. im sorry maybe its a generation gap but if i see a dude with open toe timberlands on, women tights, a womans hairdo, makeup etc... The first thought in my mind isnt gonna be man this is one str8 dude.
What the hell is wrong with you?
Seems like alot of yall are closet homosexuals and iuno taking offense to some ppl take on it. And also going waaaaaaaaaaaay eft field in response to some ppl answers. I mean hell we had a dude who said wrong is wrong and being treated different for being homosexual is in the same light as having a family member kidnapped tortured murdered and raped. Saying that its all the same cause wrong is wrong.
Then you got dudes saying i dont see why someone would question my sexuality because i cant see why would str8 men find 2 attractive women sexually arousing as oppose to 2 men. Then you have ppl saying i cant understand how/why ppl would question my sexuality because if i acted feminine and wore clothes that were made specifically for women. And this is the killer one from another thread, dudes said i cant see how someone would question sexual orientation if a bunch of dudes jerk off on a cookie and the last one to finish has to eat it.
Originally Posted by cartune
Do some of you feel that homosexuals are weak so you have to jump in front of a car for them?
Theres hella threads making fun of one group or another and a lot of the usual suspects go out of there way to defend gay people's honor
Whats the difference?
I mean I can clown a fat person I find fat people kissing gross. But if I say a man kissing another man is gross here comes the cavalry saying Im homophobic or a closet #%%#
This is why its hard to take some of you serious
Originally Posted by LDJ
Originally Posted by CurbYourEnthusiasm
Originally Posted by LDJ
Do not get it. I think most ppl will and disassociate casual sex with marriage. Also the 2 girls comment is different because im pretty sure most ppl are referring to 2 chicks who are attractive, and moreso bi as opposed to 2 chicks that look like rosie odonnell or ellen degeneres.
son, do you even know how dumb you sound right now?
i pray you are making a corny joke which cant be articulated on the internet...
im guessing maybe your homosexual not sure, because i cannot understand how a str8 male can say whats attractive cool about 2 attractive woman as oppose to 2 ugly women making out or 2 males making out. if i see beyonce and iuno halle berry making out yes thats attractive, as it would be to most str8 males. monique and precious um... not so much. um tom cruise and charlie sheen um i dont think so.
Seriously are you saying you cant see why a str8 man would find 2 woman attractive versus 2 men? I dont understand how this is dumb. If so then i guess str8 males are dumb because majority of str8 males will find 2 hot woman attractive over 2 males making out.
Well i take that back im guessing, seeing as dudes nowadays are wearing women clothes,dyeing hair etc... so i may have to retract that statement.
if i see beyonce and iuno halle berry making out yes thats attractive, as it would be to most str8 males. monique and precious um... not so much. um tom cruise and charlie sheen um i dont think so.
see, there are two types of statements.
objective
and
subjective
you have to have perspective to understand the difference.
to YOU its "attractive" to see "attractive" girls such as beyonce and halle berry kiss.......you state that "ANY STRAIGHT MALE" would agree.....even racist straight males who think black people are subhuman? they'd find that attractive? oh.
next, monique and precious? they are unattractive to YOU.....there is a huge population of people who have BBW fetishes....
charlie sheen and tom cruise?
pretty sure theres a huge population of women, gays and transgender who would find that attractive, as well....
because its subjective.
now, saying "homosexuality is wrong" while ALSO maintaining that "two hot chicks kissing is good" is a bit of a contradiction.
when you make statements then contradict yourself later .....we call that a hypocrite
i mean, i guess theres nothing wrong with being a hypocrite, you know, saying one form of homosexuality is immoral and wrong, yet lusting after another form of homosexuality at the same time......
if you're cool being one, more power to you.
im certainly not gonna hate you because you choose to be a hypocrite....
you being a hypocrite doesnt affect me, so imma let you live your life how you want...hypocritically.
(im certain you dont see what i did there. dont possibly have the brain function to see what i did there)
un true.Originally Posted by cartune
I mean I can clown a fat person I find fat people kissing gross. But if I say a man kissing another man is gross here comes the cavalry saying Im homophobic or a closet #%%#
This is why its hard to take some of you serious
see, there are two types of statements.Originally Posted by CurbYourEnthusiasm
Originally Posted by LDJ
Originally Posted by CurbYourEnthusiasm
son, do you even know how dumb you sound right now?
i pray you are making a corny joke which cant be articulated on the internet...
im guessing maybe your homosexual not sure, because i cannot understand how a str8 male can say whats attractive cool about 2 attractive woman as oppose to 2 ugly women making out or 2 males making out. if i see beyonce and iuno halle berry making out yes thats attractive, as it would be to most str8 males. monique and precious um... not so much. um tom cruise and charlie sheen um i dont think so.
Seriously are you saying you cant see why a str8 man would find 2 woman attractive versus 2 men? I dont understand how this is dumb. If so then i guess str8 males are dumb because majority of str8 males will find 2 hot woman attractive over 2 males making out.
Well i take that back im guessing, seeing as dudes nowadays are wearing women clothes,dyeing hair etc... so i may have to retract that statement.
yeah, he's just dumb.
check it, yeah, im madd gay b...super gay....like, i pop lock in coochie cutters gay.....
Yea id say so if your saying that there isnt a difference between being attracted to a woman who happens to be gay as oppose to a male. I mean if you are equally attracted to men and women then or in your case cant see the difference then yeppers you sir are gay.
oddly enough, my sexual preferences have absolutely nothing to do with the logic i presented to you all....
Yes it very well does it would make sense if you said i dont see the difference in being a str8 male being attracted to a beatiful women that is gay then being attracted to a man.
so gay or not, im still right and you still sound like an idiot.
So now that you have established your sexuality it puts everything in perspective now. I understand how you can see how being attracted to a male and a female is the same for a str8 man. EDIt i overstand cant really understand because im not attracted to men at all regardless of sexuality.
if i see beyonce and iuno halle berry making out yes thats attractive, as it would be to most str8 males. monique and precious um... not so much. um tom cruise and charlie sheen um i dont think so.