Clyde Frog
formerly jay02
- Jan 8, 2011
- 12,617
- 7,475
I'm convinced Giannis is a lock to be the best player on the team as well. But I dont really care who it ends up being.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, I just want to clarify...
Judging by the analogy...
you can be the best player in the NBA, but not quite the best because another player's team is better?
Not after what I saw in real training camp :x
I'm convinced Giannis is a lock to be the best player on the team as well. But I dont really care who it ends up being.
Look at your avy and your name b.
Ain't no way you gonna be objective about this.
Nah Steph is the most talented and the best
I'm conflicted in this argument.
I do think LeBron was the better basketball player in 2008, but Kobe had the "it factor" that is unquantifiable, but apparent.
Bron was the most talented....just like Jordan from 84-88..
But Bird and Magic were the best players at the time.
My name ain't got nothing to do with it. I moved Bron past Kobe all time, but the hyperbole is what it is. You got people who hate Kobe in here saying otherwise as well.
Jordan won DPOY, MVP, and the scoring title all in the same season and you're gonna sit here with a straight face and tell me he was, at best, the 3rd best player in the league?
We really gotta chill with using numbers as the end all be all of evaluations. It's getting ridiculous now.
By Awwsome's logic...'00-'04 Tmac is a better player than '00-04 Kobe.
The "numbers say so"
I already said I would take prime T-Mac over Kobe.
03' T-Mac was one of the best perimeter players in history.
I already said I would take prime T-Mac over Kobe.
03' T-Mac was one of the best perimeter players in history.
It's just "numbers say so" I watch just as much basketball as any human being not named Bob Voulgaris, I speak both languages.
If you watched Kobe and Tracy back then and didn't think Mac was better than hey, we just gonna have to agree to disagree.
You blinded by the fact that Kobe was playing with Shaq at the time while Mac had Pat Garrity and Darryl Armstrong.
Is this really that ridiculous of a thing to say though?We really gotta chill with using numbers as the end all be all of evaluations. It's getting ridiculous now.
By Awwsome's logic...'00-'04 Tmac is a better player than '00-04 Kobe.
The "numbers say so"
Is this really that ridiculous of a thing to say though?
I havent even dove into the Kobe / Tmac 00-04 numbers wise, but off the top of my head, this doesn't seem all that wild to say at all.
Tmac was 28/7/5 on 44/36/77
Kobe was 27/6/5 on 45/33/84
You're welcome.Thanks.
Well you can be an all world defender with Shaq on your team. Less responsibility offensively, more energy defensively, etc.So offensive numbers nearly identical but only one guy is an all world defender.
Well you can be an all world defender with Shaq on your team. Less responsibility offensively, more energy defensively, etc.
It looks to me like it was very close. Borderline hair splitting. Probably boils down to who you like more.Tmac was 28/7/5 on 44/36/77
Kobe was 27/6/5 on 45/33/84
But Kobe averaged more reb, assists, steals, same amount of blocks, same shooting percentage plus was an all NBA defender as well while playing all 82 games. Only thing T-Mac had him in was scoring 32 vs 30. So even the numbers say Kobe was better or does that only apply to Bron?
If you have shaq on your team, you don't have to go full board for the full 48 min. The offense doesn't have to run through you every offensive sequence, which it didn't. Thus, less responsibility offensively by having Shaquille.Less offensive responsibility...lol wut?