This Country Hasn't Changed One Bit

[kix4kix]

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen


I really don't care to read through this entire thread.

All I needed to know about your post.


Xanadu, you are making an argument that the past is the past. And that blacks do not have anything to complain about, because Slavery was 3-4 generations ago.


Jim crow racism existed up unitl 40 years ago, and arguably still does today.

Institutional share-cropping, is still slavery.

Lynchings was what whites called justice just 40 years ago. So stop with the BS ASAP.


To say my family didn't own slaves, is a mute point. Its like saying I was a NAZI, but I didn't kill no Jews

 

[JD617]

.

 

[kix4kix]

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Don, you want an example of black on black racism?

Watch Hotel Rwanda...

Im sick of the ignorance in this thread.

Rowanda was ruled by Belgium.

They empowered the minority (Lightskinned)

When they left the majority (darker skinned) Rebelled, it was again seeded by white Imperialism.

Know a subject before you bring it up.

 

[winstondon]

its funny how yall are trying to turn this around to some @$#$ that be going down in africa.....we're talking about AMERICA and AMERICA only....whitepeople had blacks for slaves in AMERICA....civil right issues went down in AMERICA.....and yall have the nerve to call me racist....get out of here w/ thatstuff.....seriously....what happens/happened in africa has nothing to do w/ what we're talking about and you all know it......

and props to kix4kix......

 

[HEATHEN]

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen


I really don't care to read through this entire thread.

All I needed to know about your post.

Damn he ethered me.

 

[HEATHEN]

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Don, you want an example of black on black racism?

Watch Hotel Rwanda...

Im sick of the ignorance in this thread.

Rowanda was ruled by Belgium.

They empowered the minority (Lightskinned)

When they left the majority (darker skinned) Rebelled, it was again seeded by white Imperialism.

Know a subject before you bring it up.

White imperialism?....

So racism had NOTHING to do with it?


And btw, I know about the hutu tutsi conflict...

I just feel that racism was part of it...

 

[JD617]

.

 

[paidnhalf]

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen


I really don't care to read through this entire thread.

All I needed to know about your post.


Xanadu, you are making an argument that the past is the past. And that blacks do not have anything to complain about, because Slavery was 3-4 generations ago.


Jim crow racism existed up unitl 40 years ago, and arguably still does today.

Institutional share-cropping, is still slavery.

Lynchings was what whites called justice just 40 years ago. So stop with the BS ASAP.


To say my family didn't own slaves, is a mute point. Its like saying I was a NAZI, but I didn't kill no Jews

QFT worst Argument ever. Point is it happened, and America supported it, and was even built on Slavery.


Whites who did, might still not be around, but the country surely is.

 

[winstondon]

Originally Posted by JD617

Originally Posted by WinstonDon

its funny how yall are trying to turn this around to some $@@# that be going down in africa.....we're talking about AMERICA and AMERICA only....white people had blacks for slaves in AMERICA....civil right issues went down in AMERICA.....and yall have the nerve to call me racist....get out of here w/ that stuff.....seriously....what happens/happened in africa has nothing to do w/ what we're talking about and you all know it......

So it's completely valid to be prejudiced against whites today because of that...

civil right issues weren't that damn long ago.....good god....you're acting like this $%$! was 500 years ago or something....things stillgo down today and thats why i have my views...i don't hate white people...i have interacted w/ many and i have never prejudged them based on my views....itrust people on an individual basis no matter what race they are....

 

[xanadu one]

Originally Posted by TkTheGirl

Yet you haven't presented a fact that states that black on black slavery has the worst abominations under their belt.
The only form of slavery sitting in Africa right now is slavery by African Arabs, White Africans, and small nomadic tribes who still practice serfdom.

So again how do they have the worst abominations under their belt?

black slaves were sold and traded in the Caribbean. abominations such as hunting children, transporting them in extremely unsanitary conditionsdriving them insane. often a lot of the same things the Spaniards did, but often treated worse.

i'm sorry, i can't quote a certain book right now. if you feel that what i say has no bearing because of it, then so be it.

 

[kix4kix]

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Don, you want an example of black on black racism?

Watch Hotel Rwanda...

Im sick of the ignorance in this thread.

Rowanda was ruled by Belgium.

They empowered the minority (Lightskinned)

When they left the majority (darker skinned) Rebelled, it was again seeded by white Imperialism.

Know a subject before you bring it up.

White imperialism?....

So racism had NOTHING to do with it?

Nothing at all.

Tutsi and Hutu were both black

Belgium made both groups identify, and separate legally. Thus instituting hatred against the 2 groups.
Prior to imperialism, Rwanda was in peace.

 

[tkthegirl]

Your right your argument has no bearing nor any foundation to it at all.

 

[paidnhalf]

Originally Posted by TkTheGirl

Your right your argument has no bearing nor any foundation to it at all.

/Got em

 

[xanadu one]

ok.


nice sig by the way.
so nice to have Americans like you.


i should have just read that and ignored you to begin with.

 

[tkthegirl]

Originally Posted by xanadu one

ok.


nice sig by the way.
so nice to have Americans like you.


i should have just read that and ignored you to begin with.

Yes God damn me for quoting a controversial cartoon show.

 

[winstondon]

Originally Posted by xanadu one

ok.


nice sig by the way.
so nice to have Americans like you.


i should have just read that and ignored you to begin with.

.....


and jesus was dark skinned......you're a fool if you think he had blond hair and blue eyes

in the middle east??? ahh hell noooooooo lmao

 

[HEATHEN]

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Don, you want an example of black on black racism?

Watch Hotel Rwanda...

Im sick of the ignorance in this thread.

Rowanda was ruled by Belgium.

They empowered the minority (Lightskinned)

When they left the majority (darker skinned) Rebelled, it was again seeded by white Imperialism.

Know a subject before you bring it up.

White imperialism?....

So racism had NOTHING to do with it?

Nothing at all.

Tutsi and Hutu were both black

Belgium made both groups identify, and separate legally. Thus instituting hatred against the 2 groups.
Prior to imperialism, Rwanda was in peace.

Okay I agree with everything you said,

but....

School me,


Why prior to imperialism was there a division between them?

 

[kix4kix]

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Don, you want an example of black on black racism?

Watch Hotel Rwanda...

Im sick of the ignorance in this thread.

Rowanda was ruled by Belgium.

They empowered the minority (Lightskinned)

When they left the majority (darker skinned) Rebelled, it was again seeded by white Imperialism.

Know a subject before you bring it up.

White imperialism?....

So racism had NOTHING to do with it?

Nothing at all.

Tutsi and Hutu were both black

Belgium made both groups identify, and separate legally. Thus instituting hatred against the 2 groups.
Prior to imperialism, Rwanda was in peace.

Okay I agree with everything you said,

but....

School me,


Why prior to imperialism was there a division between them?

It was economic, not racial.

tutsi were merchants, and the Hutu were herders


As with everything in Africa, it was TRIBAL not racial.

 

[early90s]

^clown

 

[winstondon]

Originally Posted by early90s

^clown

so your opinions isn't valid anymore since you're sending personal attacks at people now

ima just sit back and watch the meltdown...and thanks for the racist pm....not going to say any names though lol

 

[xanadu one]

winston - i never called you racist. **i was writing this during his last post - i never messaged him**



and i don't know how much more effort i can pt into this debate when my points can't be seen. i never mention civil rights in any one of my points.

i'm not arguing FORE it. nor am i arguing FORE slavery. what a joke.

my point is that African American's blame American Whites. American whites did not start slavery. civilization did not start in America, and neither didslavery. American whites as well as the American society were pretty much the last slave traders in histroy, besides the small time "sefdom"practiced in small tribes. slavery comes from money. the southern slave trade ran rampid because thats where all of the colonies money was. it took a lot moneyto have slaves in the colonies and it was the cotton and tobacco farmers that could afford it. just the the "serfdom" concept mentioned. the higherup in the society the more likely you were to have slaves. which in the 1600's and beyond was considered a right.

all this history just carried over to the new world. the colonies.

i'm sorry for it. i am.
but i'm also sorry for the people perpetuating the racism.

 

[bigsean]

Originally Posted by WinstonDon

Originally Posted by early90s

^clown

so your opinions isn't valid anymore since you're sending personal attacks at people now

ima just sit back and watch the meltdown...and thanks for the racist pm....not going to say any names though lol

All dude could say is ^clown

idiot

 

[HEATHEN]

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen

Don, you want an example of black on black racism?

Watch Hotel Rwanda...

Im sick of the ignorance in this thread.

Rowanda was ruled by Belgium.

They empowered the minority (Lightskinned)

When they left the majority (darker skinned) Rebelled, it was again seeded by white Imperialism.

Know a subject before you bring it up.

White imperialism?....

So racism had NOTHING to do with it?

Nothing at all.

Tutsi and Hutu were both black

Belgium made both groups identify, and separate legally. Thus instituting hatred against the 2 groups.
Prior to imperialism, Rwanda was in peace.

Okay I agree with everything you said,

but....

School me,


Why prior to imperialism was there a division between them?

It was economic, not racial.

tutsi were merchants, and the Hutu were herders

Okay I'd like to quote a paragraph from wikipedia...

The origins of the Tutsi and Hutupeoples is a key issue in the history of Rwanda, as well as the GreatLakes region of Africa. While the Hutu are generally recognized asthe ethnic majorityof Rwanda, in racialistideology the Tutsi were identified as a foreign race, as opposed toan indigenous minority. The relationship between the two is thus, in many ways, derived from the perceived origins and claim to"Rwandan-ness". The largest conflict related to this question was the 1994 Rwandan Genocide.


As opposed to an indigenous minority....

"Rwandan-ness"...

All I'm asking you is this....

You're saying that prior to the conflict, prior to the imperialism...

There was NO (none whatsoever) racism/racist sentiments between the two groups?

 

[bigsean]

Originally Posted by WinstonDon

Originally Posted by early90s

^clown

so your opinions isn't valid anymore since you're sending personal attacks at people now

ima just sit back and watch the meltdown...and thanks for the racist pm....not going to say any names though lol

All dude could say is ^clown

idiot

 

[kix4kix]

Okay I'd like to qoute a paragraph from wikipedia...


Once again that is all I needed to read from your post.