- May 15, 2003
- 56,657
- 65,603
Looking good
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
game time decision. i like the colorway just dont think i have the funds for that. hmmm.Looking good
did they say anything or are you telling me to tweet?
u would pay 215 for em now? resell might not even hit 190 after the fact. u know these are 150 retail so its not 40 over retail. ur looking at 65-70 over.Just copped for 215. Not that bad in my eyes seeing how it's like plus 40 with retail after tax here. Work RD so glad I could find a on hand legit pair for a decent price.
First pair of 2s. Check
I'm such a FAN of JORDAN's that were actually Worn by MJ….
OG COLOR WAYS are a Must HAVE!!
View media item 1009458
anyone have some Shiekh raffle codes for LA Area?
I'm such a FAN of JORDAN's that were actually Worn by MJ….
OG COLOR WAYS are a Must HAVE!!
As a point of order ... the OGs had the "blackwall" trim along the low side of the shoe, as did the 1994, 2004, and 2010 retro releases. These shoes coming out Saturday, like the 2008 pack release, have white trim instead of the black. That's a clear difference, but is it enough of a difference to make this not an "OG" colorway? I don't know how that is defined ...
I have to admit it does matter to me. I have the 2004s and they are still in great shape. If the shoes dropping in two days were identical, if they had the blackwall trim, I wouldn't get them. But the white trim makes them different enough for me to attempt a game day cop ...
what do you mean with white/black trim?
I know that the AJ 2 white/black-varsity red retros of 2006 had that black/red lining while the OGs and 1994 retros didn't.
Concerning the AJ 2 white/varsity red-grey which gets the first official retro after seeing them in the CDP a few years ago,
these always had the black/red lining like on the OGs.
What is defintely different is the shape of the toe area, the ankle and the outsole (JORDAN instead of NIKE).
And of course the quality type of leather beng used, but this is expected to be altered.
they have to be retroing the bulls colorway in the soon future. i think this is why they put the elephant print on the concords n.a. hmm
concords without the elephant print would have been pretty dope
How NOT to wear your 2's, and any other sneaker at that
View media item 1004488
Compare the shoes in posts #1943 and #1938. The OG (#193 has black along the bottom side of both shoes -as did the 94, 04, and 10 retros. But, the retros coming out Saturday (#1943) are white all the way down, like the 08 pack release. As for the 06, I didn't know such a shoe existed.
It was 2004, not 2006, by the way fam.
But yeah, he's confusing two different colorways as being different variations of one.