- 12,061
- 5,112
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2007
DJ, do you have an online portfolio of your wedding photographs?
www.jamesyoungphotography.com
I have about 6 weddings that I need to find my favorite shot and upload it to my site.
Never ending to-do list
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
DJ, do you have an online portfolio of your wedding photographs?
I know yall more experienced then me, but i thought i woukd share this anyways. Watched these for the first time and learned some things. Watch the other videos on the channel as well
Im on mobile so i cant embed sorry.
wow she's incredibly annoying
Anybody use the Holdfast system? I want one, but so damn expensive
![]()
![]()
ayeeeeee a fellow t3i shooter
looks like you mentioned you shoot with my primary lens. the cheap 50mm 1.8. yea its cramped. sometimes it doesn't focus and i miss a lot of shots. i always have to compose my shots to get anything good and candids are always hit or miss. to make sure i dont miss i always use live view and manual focus. always seemed best at f2.8
on that note sine i only always shoot at f2.8 on the 50mm, how is that tamron 17-50. im sure thats why you got it to resolve your issue with the 50mm being cramped and at least you have a wider scope at 17. i was looking at the tamron after you posted you were a t3i shooter. looks liek its a few hundred bucks lol. is it worth it? is that the one with VC? thtas their image stablization ya?
the thing with the 50 1.8, before i got it it was always praised as good for low light etc. but at 1.8 i never felt it to be that sharp and i never like shooting above 800 iso on our t3i, and without IS on the 50mm it was hard to get good shots ironically in low light hand held. is the tamron sharp wide open? im interested in a 17-50mm since ive gotten so use to shooting at 50mm and on our crop sensor thats like 80mm so its a "portrait lens" lol but i would like to be able to shoot wider so id ont have to take multiple lens. after that i prob get something even wider than 17mm. then i think im good until i brush up my skills and editing more.
Criticism please? I would still call myself a noob and want to make my photos have life like what I see in these threads.
I'm playing around in lightroom and am still getting a feel of it.
From my trip to Hawaii. To see more from my trip, feel free to check my Oahu thread.
Edit - I believe every photo was shot with a 35mm F2.0
Gave prime shooting another try since being so put off by using a 50mm on a crop sensor.
Criticism please? I would still call myself a noob and want to make my photos have life like what I see in these threads.
I'm playing around in lightroom and am still getting a feel of it.
Which one between these two? I have mixed feelings.
![]()
![]()
I know this is all being talked about in the Apple thread but I wonder how the Apple 7 phone will be with cameras now that you can essentially shoot photos with Bokeh now. Of course this is all subject to tests but pocketable cameras are definitely more obsolete now if this phone does that properly. I swear.....I never thought I'd see the day a phone would do that.
I know this is all being talked about in the Apple thread but I wonder how the Apple 7 phone will be with cameras now that you can essentially shoot photos with Bokeh now. Of course this is all subject to tests but pocketable cameras are definitely more obsolete now if this phone does that properly. I swear.....I never thought I'd see the day a phone would do that.
I really think consumer cameras are on their way out
i been saying that at the effective focal length, flagship phones can out basic DSLRs
If the ip7 had a headphone jack, I would have bought one for sure.
I know this is all being talked about in the Apple thread but I wonder how the Apple 7 phone will be with cameras now that you can essentially shoot photos with Bokeh now. Of course this is all subject to tests but pocketable cameras are definitely more obsolete now if this phone does that properly. I swear.....I never thought I'd see the day a phone would do that.
I really think consumer cameras are on their way out
i been saying that at the effective focal length, flagship phones can out basic DSLRs
I know this is all being talked about in the Apple thread but I wonder how the Apple 7 phone will be with cameras now that you can essentially shoot photos with Bokeh now. Of course this is all subject to tests but pocketable cameras are definitely more obsolete now if this phone does that properly. I swear.....I never thought I'd see the day a phone would do that.
I really think consumer cameras are on their way out
i been saying that at the effective focal length, flagship phones can out basic DSLRs
I just can't agree with the statement that a tiny cellphone sensor is as good as even the cheapest nikon dslr sensor.
I know this is all being talked about in the Apple thread but I wonder how the Apple 7 phone will be with cameras now that you can essentially shoot photos with Bokeh now. Of course this is all subject to tests but pocketable cameras are definitely more obsolete now if this phone does that properly. I swear.....I never thought I'd see the day a phone would do that.
I really think consumer cameras are on their way out
i been saying that at the effective focal length, flagship phones can out basic DSLRs
yea it is a wrap for consumer cameras, smartphones have succeeded in making taking pictures easier in a way that consumer camera makers have not...though in no way are even the best of the smartphone cameras in the class of dslrs in terms of pure image capture, it may eventually become the case, it may be sooner than most would guess, but it isn't close to being true now...
if the point you are making is that flagship phones are more useful for most people in the situations that most people are displaying & viewing images, that is unequivocally true as consumer camera sales attest to. that is very different than saying that these phones are on the same level as larger sensored dedicated cameras.
given how powerful phones continue to get, computational photography (light field technology, using multiple smaller sensors at different focal lengths, using computer processing) will likely make up a lot of the space between larger sensors and likely bring cooler additional stuff as well, but i'd imagine larger cameras will get some of these things as well, so i don't imagine it ever really be objectively true that these phones will be as good as larger sensored cameras, but the pace of smartphone development has been moving much faster than cameras, such that the cameras in our phones are well past good enough for the vast majority of us...
for example, people having been making feature films with dslr style cameras (there was even a feature film made on an iphone) and using action cameras on high production projects, i don't think they'd say that those cameras are better or as good as dedicated cinema cameras, because they offer distinct advantages over high quality expensive cinema cameras, it is the same with smartphones, they output great quality, they are easy enough to use, fit in a pocket, and who in this day in age has to remember to bring the phone anywhere? whereas dedicated cameras lose on most of those things for the average person
If the ip7 had a headphone jack, I would have bought one for sure.
I'm glad its getting phased out.... such an outdated technology.
Im pretty sure it comes with a lightning to 3.5mm adapter... if not one can be purchased.
I know this is all being talked about in the Apple thread but I wonder how the Apple 7 phone will be with cameras now that you can essentially shoot photos with Bokeh now. Of course this is all subject to tests but pocketable cameras are definitely more obsolete now if this phone does that properly. I swear.....I never thought I'd see the day a phone would do that.
I really think consumer cameras are on their way out
i been saying that at the effective focal length, flagship phones can out basic DSLRs
yea it is a wrap for consumer cameras, smartphones have succeeded in making taking pictures easier in a way that consumer camera makers have not...though in no way are even the best of the smartphone cameras in the class of dslrs in terms of pure image capture, it may eventually become the case, it may be sooner than most would guess, but it isn't close to being true now...
if the point you are making is that flagship phones are more useful for most people in the situations that most people are displaying & viewing images, that is unequivocally true as consumer camera sales attest to. that is very different than saying that these phones are on the same level as larger sensored dedicated cameras.
given how powerful phones continue to get, computational photography (light field technology, using multiple smaller sensors at different focal lengths, using computer processing) will likely make up a lot of the space between larger sensors and likely bring cooler additional stuff as well, but i'd imagine larger cameras will get some of these things as well, so i don't imagine it ever really be objectively true that these phones will be as good as larger sensored cameras, but the pace of smartphone development has been moving much faster than cameras, such that the cameras in our phones are well past good enough for the vast majority of us...
for example, people having been making feature films with dslr style cameras (there was even a feature film made on an iphone) and using action cameras on high production projects, i don't think they'd say that those cameras are better or as good as dedicated cinema cameras, because they offer distinct advantages over high quality expensive cinema cameras, it is the same with smartphones, they output great quality, they are easy enough to use, fit in a pocket, and who in this day in age has to remember to bring the phone anywhere? whereas dedicated cameras lose on most of those things for the average person
Yeah i think my statement is a bit too bold and missleading.
Like i said, i understand that spec per spec a DLSR outclasses a phone
Im just saying in a practical, real world use, most consumers who are getting DSLRs only need what flagship phones can do and rarely what DSLRs can do.
Also understanding a strong photograph is composed by the shooter, not the camera.
a person taking crappy snap shots will be doing it with a phone or a canon 1D X Mark II