- Jul 2, 2001
- 24,020
- 3,135
Story behind the NRG pairs
I kinda want them now
I kinda want them now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because they correlate. Making a story, making them limited, more buzz is created. People will buy shoes just to resell and just to post on IG how cool they are.
If you don't see all of that happening and understand that, than you are truly sheltered.
I don't know man, it's kinda hard to take your word when you didn't even know what shoe you were getting raffle tickets for...but if it's one per day, so be it.If you say so
View media item 771275
Dude never mind twitter. Good old Human interaction. they looked me in my face when they said one entry per person per day. And the person behind me. As well as the person before me. Or maybe I should just be keeping this info to myself?? Probably should, it's only the third day of the raffle.
Yeah, why not just stop paying attention to the backstory? People get mad because it builds hype for some shoe. That's what they want to happen, it's the whole point. Why would they stop this?
Who cares about whether Nike makes a back story or not. If you like a shoe, buy em. If not, keep it movin
Nike's job is to sell shoes and they are gonna do whatever they think it takes to sell the most shoes, even if it means writing a book on each sneaker released
Sheltered is not realizing that tons of GR brons and KDs have back stories and have sat over the last two models.
Nobody had problems getting their hands on pressures, PB&Js, Akron V Miami's, Re-Entry's, Splatters, Meteorology's etc...
Backstory does not mean unattainable.
Because they correlate. Making a story, making them limited, more buzz is created. People will buy shoes just to resell and just to post on IG how cool they are.
If you don't see all of that happening and understand that, than you are truly sheltered.
Sheltered is not realizing that tons of GR brons and KDs have back stories and have sat over the last two models.
Nobody had problems getting their hands on pressures, PB&Js, Akron V Miami's, Re-Entry's, Splatters, Meteorology's etc...
Backstory does not mean unattainable.
I don't know man, it's kinda hard to take your word when you didn't even know what shoe you were getting raffle tickets for...but if it's one per day, so be it.
So basically what you're talking about isn't even the backstory at all, you just proved it. You're talking about how limited the shoe is/ how much are put out for retail.GR kicks sit? WHO WOULD OF THOUGHT
That's not what IM talking about.
Well I just called DSM, and you were right about DSM doing one per person per day.I don't know man, it's kinda hard to take your word when you didn't even know what shoe you were getting raffle tickets for...but if it's one per day, so be it.
believe it or not, EVERYONE who was there thought they were raffling for MASTERPIECES. being that nike said the MP were the first Kobe 9 to release after the preludes. so dont do that to me.
If everyone there thought they were raffling for masterpieces then everyone there was dumb.
Well I just called DSM, and you were right about DSM doing one per person per day.
lol, I don't know man, the black and white pairs were both sitting right there on the raffle table when you sign up.
obviously nike's story telling worked on the older folks then just as its working young cats today, every generation wants to put down the one that come after them because they do things a differently or in their own way, but the constant has been nike's story telling; that was the one thing that they've done better than others...
The distinction that needs to be made here is between STORY TELLING and MARKETING. Nike has always had a great ability to market their products (or to hire Wieden and Kennedy to market their products), but this whole "every shoe has some divine inspiration behind it that we must now impart to you before it releases so that you have an adequate nickname for our product" spiel wasn't happening until a few years ago, and it's really picked up steam in the last year or two.
you are definitely right about there being a distinction between marketing & storytelling, but the 2 are related now especially & increasingly so. most athletes didn't have commercials but they were certainly in print ads, and designers definitely had inspiration & links to athletes when they create product (which is more the point I want to make) I wasn't trying to offend or put people into a box...but I do think it comes down to the story, whether it comes from the brand (ads, etc.), a community (nicknames), or the individual (nostalgia/connection to a particular player) of course varies for everybody...
I was just perusing for info on these moves, and these comments stood out to me....back to your regularly scheduled programming...
Naw bro, they aren't just "black and white" they're a tribute to Kobe's favorite cookies that he ate once before a game. They're the Oreos.LMAO AT THIS CONVO ABOUT STORYTELLING.
ITS NEEDED BC KOBE IS NOT JORDAN
THEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE END.
WANNA KNOW WHAT BACKWARDS?
MAKING A BLACK AND WHITE PAIR LIMITED TO RAFFLE
Cinnamon sugar for sureI wonder what Kobe's favorite pop tart is
Right, Nike is gonna do it, so just ignore it and buy what you think looks good
Yeah, why not just stop paying attention to the backstory? People get mad because it builds hype for some shoe. That's what they want to happen, it's the whole point. Why would they stop this?