classified
Banned
- 467
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2010
The Official 2010 NCAA March Madness Thread -- * Kentucky and Kansas State Fall *
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by jpzx,
- Start date
- 8,259
- 573
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
Originally Posted by venom lyrix
what in gods name makes you so confident against a great Marquette team?Originally Posted by VCXV
Huskies couldn't have gotten a better drawI was hopin they'd get a higher seed seeing as they really turned it on finishing winning 13 of their last 15 capping it with a victory to with the PX tourney, but seeing them as an 11 vs Marquettte as a 6 is great. Then meeting New Mexico in the 2nd round is even better! Both these competitors, I think, will find difficulty with Washington's depth and weapons, and neither team has a legitimate Center/anyone effective over 6'9" which has really been the only problem for the Huskies this season. I like our chances!
I do admit that Marquette is good, but the Huskies have been playing great these past few weeks. What I don't get though is how Cal got an 8 seed
- 686
- 15
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
Wild picks caused me to have the number 1 bracket at my school the year George Mason made it to the Final Four.
Last year I did the same thing and my bracket was some %$$$.
- 2,328
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
i hit licks
Banned
- 477
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
Good pick.Originally Posted by classified
Terps makin' the final four.
black jesus
Banned
- 1,798
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
ima wait till the vegas lines come out before i do my bracket...hopefully thats by Tuesday...which it should be
- 17,900
- 793
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
Originally Posted by CertifiedSW
Originally Posted by venom lyrix
what in gods name makes you so confident against a great Marquette team?Originally Posted by VCXV
Huskies couldn't have gotten a better drawI was hopin they'd get a higher seed seeing as they really turned it on finishing winning 13 of their last 15 capping it with a victory to with the PX tourney, but seeing them as an 11 vs Marquettte as a 6 is great. Then meeting New Mexico in the 2nd round is even better! Both these competitors, I think, will find difficulty with Washington's depth and weapons, and neither team has a legitimate Center/anyone effective over 6'9" which has really been the only problem for the Huskies this season. I like our chances!
I do admit that Marquette is good, but the Huskies have been playing great these past few weeks. What I don't get though is how Cal got an 8 seed
Like Marquette Hasn't Played Great These Past Few Weeks.
- 12,388
- 6,823
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2000
- 28,226
- 3,086
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2009
My Final 4:
Kansas
Syracuse
Texas
Nova
Reaction?
Kansas
Syracuse
Texas
Nova
Reaction?
i hit licks
Banned
- 477
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
Good 1.
- 17,900
- 793
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
You're tweeking.
MVP
Supporter
- 82,857
- 85,200
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Either UK or WVU is coming out of that region, Texas could and probably will lose in the 1st round.
- 8,526
- 16
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2007
nah, Texas will definitely beat Wake. from there it'll be a quick exit.
- 43,618
- 8,604
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
Wow Kansas
- 8,526
- 16
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2007
dear VT,
--selection committee
- 7,993
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2007
Midwest bracket is the hardest to figure out though. Zags/FSU and Cornell/Temple will be interesting to watch.
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
I can't imagine anyone of a fan of a team in the Midwest is pleased. I know I'm not.
Brutal.
Brutal.
- 20,619
- 1,615
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
Originally Posted by Seymore CAKE
Originally Posted by CertifiedSW
Originally Posted by venom lyrix
what in gods name makes you so confident against a great Marquette team?Originally Posted by VCXV
Huskies couldn't have gotten a better drawI was hopin they'd get a higher seed seeing as they really turned it on finishing winning 13 of their last 15 capping it with a victory to with the PX tourney, but seeing them as an 11 vs Marquettte as a 6 is great. Then meeting New Mexico in the 2nd round is even better! Both these competitors, I think, will find difficulty with Washington's depth and weapons, and neither team has a legitimate Center/anyone effective over 6'9" which has really been the only problem for the Huskies this season. I like our chances!
I do admit that Marquette is good, but the Huskies have been playing great these past few weeks. What I don't get though is how Cal got an 8 seed
Like Marquette Hasn't Played Great These Past Few Weeks.
seriously...and Big East > cottenelle Pac 10
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- 106,509
- 52,657
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
seriously
- 1,155
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
upset special: Oakland over Pitt.
- 28,226
- 3,086
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2009
Lol ya'll see. It's matchup hell for UK
- 305
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2001
What makes me confident is both these schools play a very similar style of ball, but I believe UW has more depth and dependable big men. Word up to Digger Phelps who is also smelling this upset.
- 28,226
- 3,086
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2009
Man i swear filling out these brackets can turn your hairs gray smh
Edit: Btw, i went back with UK vs Syracuse in the Championship game. Lol
Edit: Btw, i went back with UK vs Syracuse in the Championship game. Lol
- 305
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2001
Nobody ever said Pac X > Big East. I agree the Big East is LEAPS AND BOUNDS better than the PAC in basketball this season. I'm just saying I personally believe UW has a slight edge over Marquette in what appears to be a very fun game to watch with two uptempo defense-equates to-offense type teams. Both play man defense. Both have guards that love to drive and dish out to the 3. Both have relatively small teams in comparison to others, but capitalize on that asset. Both made it to the dance last year and have some experience. I'm just saying I think the Huskies can go deeep on their bench and that will eventually tire out the Golden Eagles in a game that may come down the the wire. Thats all. To each their own, but in now way was I insinuating the pac was better than the big east. That conference was STACKED this year and every one of those 8 teams deserved to be in. Good luck to MU fans, were just glad UW hit the upswing and won out to make it to the tourney, hopefully they can ride that momentum because I think they got a good draw.
jpzx
Supporter
- 57,381
- 27,193
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
Stop trying to act hard. You're going to watch either way.5am6oody72 wrote:
!*%$ the selection committee. Not watching the tournament this year this is some #+@#.
Guy realized he misread so his rebuttal was just "shut up"EightysBaby wrote:
Shut the #$+@ up.Originally Posted by Lex Starks
I said wishful thinking dummy.Originally Posted by EightysBaby
You're joking right?
Duke gone easily blow past Winthrop.
kingkb34 wrote:
Also %$#! the NCAA Committee for putting every Big Ten team on Friday...
I know you would probably like to watch them all live, but you can watch them all back on the NCAA March Madness on Demand player. That's what I'm planning to do at least.
RoOk wrote:
My Final 4:
Kansas
Syracuse
Texas
Nova
Reaction?
All i'm going to say is how are you going to give youngmoney a hard time about being wild with his picks when you got Texas in your Final 4...what have they done in the past month to warrant a Final Four berth from you? I'm curious.
