- 12,426
- 2,239
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2001
be hard to hold off Nova at this point.Don't care if he's only 5'6, Chris Lykes is going to be one of the best guards in CBB by the time he's done. Hopefully he stays home.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
be hard to hold off Nova at this point.Don't care if he's only 5'6, Chris Lykes is going to be one of the best guards in CBB by the time he's done. Hopefully he stays home.
Duke and Kentucky are so dominant in recruiting at this point does it really even matter? How much better can it really get?NBA experience, young, black, relatable. He should be.
You really think so
Yea like someone else said...hes young and relatable...good boost
Good for him but kinda shocked with how weak this draft is.California forward Ivan Rabb has decided to stay in school for his sophomore season rather than enter the NBA draft.
Whoa.California forward Ivan Rabb has decided to stay in school for his sophomore season rather than enter the NBA draft.
I thought he was more NBA ready than Jaylen Brown.
Rabb could stand to get stronger and polish up his back to the basket game. That said, I thought he was more NBA ready than Jaylen Brown.
Love it. Every part of it.Unc received their Allegations
Filed an injunction in Indy this weekend because of how bad it is
Supposedly it's 89-2011 and that 1-3 mbb were named every season as ineligible. 93,05 in danger, wins vacated as well, 2 yr ban and scholly loss
Love it. Every part of it.
How can you even speculate on the punishment when the NOA hasn't been released? Is this info coming from the NCAA? There's still a huge chunk of the process left.Unc received their Allegations
Filed an injunction in Indy this weekend because of how bad it is
Supposedly it's 89-2011 and that 1-3 mbb were named every season as ineligible. 93,05 in danger, wins vacated as well, 2 yr ban and scholly loss
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/college/acc/unc/article73736122.html#storylink=cpyThe new NOA, though, is not an end point as much as it is a new beginning to a case that still has several steps to go before a resolution is reached.
UNC now has another 90 days to respond to the amended NOA, as the university had when it received the original NOA. It’s unclear whether UNC will take the full 90 days to respond.
After UNC submits its response, whenever it might come, the NCAA then has approximately one month to respond to that response, at which time it will set a date for UNC to appear before the NCAA Committee on Infractions, which is the judge and jury in NCAA infractions cases.
After UNC’s appearance before the infractions committee it could take another three months, at least, for the committee to announce the penalties and sanctions UNC would face. At that point UNC could appeal the Committee on Infractions’ ruling.
A final resolution, then, is still several months away and the case will likely stretch into 2017.
Love it. Every part of it.Unc received their Allegations
Filed an injunction in Indy this weekend because of how bad it is
Supposedly it's 89-2011 and that 1-3 mbb were named every season as ineligible. 93,05 in danger, wins vacated as well, 2 yr ban and scholly loss