everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Originally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
I think the main problem here is ppl are not looking at it correctly. Yall shouldn't even be factoring w/e the hell the Hulk does. That's all cgi. You're suppose to look at the portrayal of Banner. I don't got a hard on for Norton but he is a really good actor and Norton did a great job as Banner. IMO you can't compare his whole film of being Banner to Ruffalo's Banner. If you do there's no objective way Ruffalo did the better job of portraying Banner. Any argument for Ruffalo is gonna involve a bunch of excuses about the team's dynamic in the Avengers movie. Yall don't have a good enough idea how an entire movie with Ruffalo as Banner would even be.
Pro-Ruffalo people don't just look at what the Hulk does, but you continue to dismiss their other comments as unfounded opinions over and over again. Length of screen time shouldn't matter when it comes to gauging someone's acting ability. Just agree to disagree and recognize that the fact that saying Norton would've been a perfect Banner in this movie is an opinion too .... a minority opinion at this point. Just like we have no way of knowing how Ruffalo will be as a Banner in his own solo movie until he does it, we have no way of knowing how Norton would've worked out in an ensemble movie with this particular cast as Banner until he does it. We'll never know actually.