- Sep 2, 2010
- 3,531
- 11
THIS, I swear to God... you don't even understand how hard I'm cosigning this statement right here. Ugh... so effing what.
So the girl that was drowning those puppies about a month ago will go unpunished/Vol.SMH!!!!!!!
- Aug 18, 2010
- 4,363
- 10
There's no justification for her actions. She killed a clear living thing for no reason at all. Who cares about what her "culture" defines as pest. There is no reason to kill something unjustified. How can you idiots justify throwing a dog in a pool to the meat industry? Do you not see the huge difference? Do any of you eat dog? If you did maybe I could understand why you think that but most of you don't eat dog so why compare it to food?
Only an idiot would agree with her actions.
Only an idiot would agree with her actions.
moneyisthemotive
Banned
- Mar 7, 2010
- 2,784
- 10
people completely miss the point when it comes to issues like this ... it's not about the puppies or the person or whatever ... it's the capacity of a human being to kill something in the manner in which she did, while gaining no value whatsoever ...
we may not HAVE to kill animals the way we do in this country, but at least we eat them ... it's natural for a dominant species to feed on lower parts of the food chain ... but to just kill things for the hell of it is disgusting ... this girl is disgusting and mentally disturbed ... mike vick was reportedly strangling dogs and electrocuting them, dude is disturbed ...
anyone who doesnt use the things they kill, in my eyes, is disturbed ... i love to shoot guns but i will never take my .22 out and go after squirrels or birds because i wont eat them and they are just trying to live ... now if i go hunting and knock a deer down and use the hide for a rug and meat for a stew, i'm fine with that ...
we may not HAVE to kill animals the way we do in this country, but at least we eat them ... it's natural for a dominant species to feed on lower parts of the food chain ... but to just kill things for the hell of it is disgusting ... this girl is disgusting and mentally disturbed ... mike vick was reportedly strangling dogs and electrocuting them, dude is disturbed ...
anyone who doesnt use the things they kill, in my eyes, is disturbed ... i love to shoot guns but i will never take my .22 out and go after squirrels or birds because i wont eat them and they are just trying to live ... now if i go hunting and knock a deer down and use the hide for a rug and meat for a stew, i'm fine with that ...
- Jul 19, 2008
- 9,611
- 14
- Feb 28, 2003
- 9,503
- 419
put em up
Banned
- Apr 21, 2009
- 3,978
- 11
put em up
Banned
- Apr 21, 2009
- 3,978
- 11
fixed.
put em up
Banned
- Apr 21, 2009
- 3,978
- 11
- Dec 21, 2004
- 1,578
- 10
Im sure those puppies were gonna be put down anyway. she was just having fun....
is it #%+*%! up??? Yea does she deserve jail time??? not really.
I was at a butcher shop the other day and they were killing rabbits. just slicing there throats.
now that was #%+*%! up.
is it #%+*%! up??? Yea does she deserve jail time??? not really.
I was at a butcher shop the other day and they were killing rabbits. just slicing there throats.
budweiser
Banned
- Aug 3, 2010
- 2,123
- 10
Basically. My Mexican friend was telling me how chunks of poisoned meat are thrown around certain towns to kill wild dogs. It's an actual problem that spoiled Americans can't relate to. And people writing, 'When we kill animals, we do it for a reason' ... what a farce. Do you think that makes a difference to the animals getting killed? Like it somehow hurts less because they're being killed for food rather than sport.
Some of you dudes really need to grow up. God knows Bosnia has more problems than a teenager killing puppies.
- Aug 18, 2010
- 4,363
- 10
This guy is the truth.
- Nov 5, 2007
- 6,402
- 193
We should do this with babies as well. Fewer worthless mouth breathers in the world would be fantastic.
edit: I forgot that would just be someone's choice to throw babies in a river so it wouldn't be an issue.
edit: I forgot that would just be someone's choice to throw babies in a river so it wouldn't be an issue.
- Apr 23, 2001
- 1,538
- 513
Weren't the does going to die anyways? They were really sick and couldn't be save.
Cruel none the less.
Or is it cruel to let something suffer or to give something a slow death like drowning?
Moral issues got to love'em
Cruel none the less.
Or is it cruel to let something suffer or to give something a slow death like drowning?
Moral issues got to love'em
- Jan 3, 2008
- 12,094
- 12
christonic
Banned
- Oct 3, 2010
- 701
- 12
This
- Aug 17, 2008
- 1,713
- 274
it's just some dogs
white guilt
- May 18, 2005
- 24,030
- 1,927
maybe it's the guilt of supporting breedersOriginally Posted by LiquidCREAM
it's just some dogs
white guilt
- Feb 23, 2010
- 2,583
- 502
i thought the dogs were sick? if so then i have no problem with her wasting them.
- Jul 28, 2009
- 6,574
- 888
!++$ a dog
- Aug 2, 2009
- 1,357
- 10
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
This guy is the truth.
I think this is so so demented. HOW does eating something after you kill it make it justified? Either you can kill it or you cant. If i killed a person and ATE THAT PERSON, is that now better than killing him for no reason? Absolutely not, its even worse. It becomes entirely demented once you eat something that you believe has the right to live and dignity.
And your point's unsound. Its clearly not "the capacity of a a human being to kill something in the manner which she did". There are so so many things that people kill that you wont even flinch over. Ants? Worms? Flies? Plants? I dont see why its ok to step on an ant or swat a fly but its not ok to throw a dog in a river? Is it because theyre bigger? Surely that cant be reason enough to have rights.
Nobody in this thread has made a point. Not one. Its just - well this is obvious. If its so obvious why animals should be treated humanely, then make a point, it should be cake
- Mar 8, 2010
- 21,800
- 3,553
If I learned anything from Dexter, that girl is a sociopath.
But then she lives in Bosnia...and that's Europe's Ohio.
Her punishment is, this will probably end up on her gravestone. That claim to fame.
But then she lives in Bosnia...and that's Europe's Ohio.
Her punishment is, this will probably end up on her gravestone. That claim to fame.
Gill Baka Esq. LLC.
formerly grimlock
- Sep 28, 2008
- 10,721
- 1,527
Your trying to 1-up that dude and your failing. Have some common sense, there is a ranking system...at least to any normal person of what is okay to kill and what is not. People step on bugs and kill them without knowing, you can't step on dog like that and if you did then you did it either to harm or kill the dog theirs no in between. If the situation called for you to survive by eating your homeboy who was already on the verge of death you would either not do it and probably die or do it and have some sort of sustenance to survive until maybe you got rescued. Little boys kill ants, cockroaches. swat flies...why? maybe because their insignificant and there are so many. Man has always had a connection with certain animals, especially dogs...we use them as trackers, guards, and even as our best friends so your gonna come in this thread and say "hey its no different than someone killing an ant"?Originally Posted by Theta
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
This guy is the truth.
I think this is so so demented. HOW does eating something after you kill it make it justified? Either you can kill it or you cant. If i killed a person and ATE THAT PERSON, is that now better than killing him for no reason? Absolutely not, its even worse. It becomes entirely demented once you eat something that you believe has the right to live and dignity.
And your point's unsound. Its clearly not "the capacity of a a human being to kill something in the manner which she did". There are so so many things that people kill that you wont even flinch over. Ants? Worms? Flies? Plants? I dont see why its ok to step on an ant or swat a fly but its not ok to throw a dog in a river? Is it because theyre bigger? Surely that cant be reason enough to have rights.
Nobody in this thread has made a point. Not one. Its just - well this is obvious. If its so obvious why animals should be treated humanely, then make a point, it should be cake
Are you a moron? Do you even know what unsound means?
people swat flies because they carry disease and land on your food or can bite you and spread the disease...it's an act of self-preservation.
Plain out i'm really surprised and disturbed by some of the posts in this thread. Even if the dogs were on the verge of death or whatever you don't throw them in the river like some trash...
moneyisthemotive
Banned
- Mar 7, 2010
- 2,784
- 10
Originally Posted by Theta
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
This guy is the truth.
I think this is so so demented. HOW does eating something after you kill it make it justified? Either you can kill it or you cant. If i killed a person and ATE THAT PERSON, is that now better than killing him for no reason? Absolutely not, its even worse. It becomes entirely demented once you eat something that you believe has the right to live and dignity.
And your point's unsound. Its clearly not "the capacity of a a human being to kill something in the manner which she did". There are so so many things that people kill that you wont even flinch over. Ants? Worms? Flies? Plants? I dont see why its ok to step on an ant or swat a fly but its not ok to throw a dog in a river? Is it because theyre bigger? Surely that cant be reason enough to have rights.
Nobody in this thread has made a point. Not one. Its just - well this is obvious. If its so obvious why animals should be treated humanely, then make a point, it should be cake
It depends on what type of person you are ... When I see a spider in the house I try to trap it and take it outside, most other people try to kill it asap ... I was never the type of person to torture animals or put salt on a slug or fireworks up stray cat crevices ... kids in the neighborhood used to abuse animals and try to hit squirrels with slingshots, but i always thought of that as cruel ...
that being said, I dont HAVE to eat animals, but i do because i view it as a part of evolution ... and depending on what you believe in, the act of using that animal as much as you can is a tribute to their species and the earth ... everything is cyclical, basic food chain theory ... obviously, you have to approach this subject with a just mind ... but if you seriously want to sit here and compare a human eating a human to a human eating a cow, i feel sorry for you ... if you seriously want to say i have the same level of mental disturbance as this girl because i eat animals, i feel sorry for you ... as i said before, "it's the capacity of a human being to kill something in the manner in which she did, while gaining no value whatsoever " ... when you recognize feelings, when you can watch dogs risk their lives saving their masters, or dogs who spend the rest of their lives sleeping on their masters grave after they die, and you still think it's ok to do what she did, i feel sorry for you ...
and if i could put it this way, would you want your future daughter to marry a man who used to throw puppys in a river or a man who used to save puppys at shelters? so don't act like it's nothing or that you don't recognize how disgusting it is ...
- Oct 28, 2007
- 5,790
- 1,193
exactly...i'm shocked by how many people in this thread have such little empathy and respect for life outside of humans. some of these repsonses....
- Oct 12, 2009
- 245
- 10
First off, I think that the killing of these poor defenseless animals is barbaric. Barbaric! [/Robert Bird]
Some of you are forgetting the relationship between man and dog. Dogs and man have been together since man became a hunter. For tens of thousands of years, dogs have lived with us and have lived in our homes as another family member. Therefore, it is understandable that many people would be angry about this. We do not have that type of relationship with spiders, ants, pigs, cows, etc.
Some of you are forgetting the relationship between man and dog. Dogs and man have been together since man became a hunter. For tens of thousands of years, dogs have lived with us and have lived in our homes as another family member. Therefore, it is understandable that many people would be angry about this. We do not have that type of relationship with spiders, ants, pigs, cows, etc.
