R.I.P Trayvon

What pictures of drugs and a gun?

And it's funny how certain people will bring up the dead kids past, but never Zimmerman's.

But then they will say I'm not racist.
See this is what i'm talking about. You defend this man-Trayvon Martin, with sword and shield while you don't even know the whole story.





http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...-whistleblower-fired-20130713,0,2426704.story


"Kruidbos testified last month that he found embarrassing photos found on Trayvon's cellphone, including pictures of a clump of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semiautomatic pistol. Defense attorneys allege that data wasn't turned over to them as part of the evidence exchange process, known as discovery."
zimmerman also saw these pictures I assume, before he shot Trayvon?
 
I had NO idea of that man, I am extremely sorry. I meant in no way to speak of your deceased wife like that, just making a point about assuming things from pictures that you know nothing about (as I have shown).
Don't be sorry.

He's lying.
Damn. I have no idea but I really hope someone wouldn't joke about something like that, like I REALLY pray they wouldn't. I'm gonna stick by apologizing bc my mom has really sick and I can't even fathom joking about a loved family member being dead.
well, if it's the truth he might want to contact a few sites about getting here pictures removed...
 
Last edited:
I've been saying that from the beginning. Any white guy can do it to any minority in Florida. If it's his word against yours, and you end up dead, justice won't be served.
Yes, we do , because what was he going to do, bleed to death?

Trayvon was going to hit him with the ice tea can?
Jeez, you really can't be serious? Where was this outrage when a black killed another black? You act like Whites are racist, but you turn a blind eye to the killings of your own race.

Trayvon landed punches, that is a proven fact.
 
Its no longer self defense if you are the one who provoked the incident, if you start a barfight and get your *** handed to you you can't scream 'self defense' when things start going south.
when your parents work for law enforcement, theres a good chance that u actually can
 
lol sure, i may be stereotyping, but everyone does. I lived in the bronx for 21 years (not anymore) and i always kept an eye out for suspicious ppl. If I see someone with a hoody over their head with the news of robberies in the neighborhood, then of-effin-course im gonna suspect the person with hoody over their head walking in the middle of the night as being a criminal. No, im not playing devil's advocate. GZ did not provoke the fight. He asked trayvon what was he doing.

Come back to me when you have proof. I won't hold my breath
 
See this is what i'm talking about. You defend this man-Trayvon Martin, with sword and shield while you don't even know the whole story.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...-whistleblower-fired-20130713,0,2426704.story


"Kruidbos testified last month that he found embarrassing photos found on Trayvon's cellphone, including pictures of a clump of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semiautomatic pistol. Defense attorneys allege that data wasn't turned over to them as part of the evidence exchange process, known as discovery."

Exactly what does any of that have to do with the case?

You don't know what the pictures were of and what they were from. They could have been some pics someone else sent him or pics from twitter.

Again, you fail to mention any of Zimmerman's past transgressions, his school record or his medication history.
 
What you expect Meek?
Dude cannot believe what he's saying . . .

Zimmerman: my brother had the right to defend himself

Piers Morgan: Did Trayvon Martin have the right to defend himself?

Robert Zimmerman: From What Piers, Trayvon Martin had the right to go home

mean.gif


As if Trayvon Martin wasn't trying to do that in the first place when he left 7/11 . . . this wouldn't have happened if Zimmerman either minded his own damn business or called the cops if he was legit concerned

i gotta turn off the tv
mean.gif
if a 17 yr old kid knocked you down and he started banging your head against the concrete, would u shoot him with your gun?
You can't get to this point in the story without going over what happened leading up to it . . . Zimmerman should have never got out of the car to approach dude . . . he should have called the cops . . . for someone walking back from the gas station
laugh.gif
. . . now once he's beating your ***, you fight this 17 year old kid with your MMA trained 29 year old hands . . . you don't shoot him in the chest . . .
Would u be suspicious of a kid wearing a blk hoody in the middle of the night? I dont care what race the kid is, but if I see a kid wearing a hoody with previous reports of robberies in the neighborhood, I would keep an eye out on him.
Can see glimpses of that stereotyping and arrogance shining through.

No I would not be suspicious of anyone wearing a hoodie at night in the middle of February.
mean.gif
. It's extremely ignorant of you to assume that anyone wearing a hood in the winter is a thief.

If my family members were in this predicament, the blame would ultimately fall on them for getting out of the car after 911 told them not to pursue. It would not have been illegal for them to ignore the 911 operator and pursue the dude, but nothing good could come of that. It would have been in their best interest to stay in the car and call the cops . . . on someone coming back from the gas station with a bag of candy.

I really hope you're just playing devil's advocate and don't really believe what you're typing right now man.

If someone was following me, in the middle of the night I'm not about to wait and see what they are trying to do. For all Martin knew, Zimmerman was trying to rob/assault/abduct him.
lol sure, i may be stereotyping, but everyone does. I lived in the bronx for 21 years (not anymore) and i always kept an eye out for suspicious ppl. If I see someone with a hoody over their head with the news of robberies in the neighborhood, then of-effin-course im gonna suspect the person with hoody over their head walking in the middle of the night as being a criminal. No, im not playing devil's advocate. GZ did not provoke the fight. He asked trayvon what was he doing.
Zimmerman provoked the fight by getting out of that car. Dude wouldn't have got out if he was unarmed. If he stayed in the car and called the cops Trayvon would still be alive. But since he had that gun he felt like he could play policeman that night.

Bottom line, dude should have called the cops on the 17 year old kid walking back from the 7/11 with candy and tea.
 
I really don't understand how anyone could be on Zimmerman's side.  It would be one thing if Tray was killed within the vicinity of Zimmerman's vehicle, but this boy's body was found in between the back of homes on a dimly lit pathway.  That's enough to say Zimmerman got out of his vehicle in pursuit of trouble, and found it.  This just ensures me that black people have absolutely no rights at all.  This really sickens me.

the evidence wasn't there to convict him of murder/man slaughter in the court of law... they needed to prove he was guilty

it's really not about picking sides personally
 
lol sure, i may be stereotyping, but everyone does. I lived in the bronx for 21 years (not anymore) and i always kept an eye out for suspicious ppl. If I see someone with a hoody over their head with the news of robberies in the neighborhood, then of-effin-course im gonna suspect the person with hoody over their head walking in the middle of the night as being a criminal. No, im not playing devil's advocate. GZ did not provoke the fight. He asked trayvon what was he doing.
Who told you that there were words spoken between the two?
trayvon's side piece. you've been watching the trial or what? Or are u just participating in this thread due to race debate and trying to prove me wrong?
 
I had NO idea of that man, I am extremely sorry. I meant in no way to speak of your deceased wife like that, just making a point about assuming things from pictures that you know nothing about (as I have shown).


Don't be sorry.


He's lying.


Damn. I have no idea but I really hope someone wouldn't joke about something like that, like I REALLY pray they wouldn't. I'm gonna stick by apologizing bc my mom has really sick and I can't even fathom joking about a loved family member being dead.
well, if it's the truth he might want to contact a few sites about getting here pictures removed...

I'm on mobile and didn't really look into it but woooooow. Smh. And worrying about your kids cursing and using the middle finger gesture at any moment in their lives. Wow
 
These hypocritical idiots need to shut up about the damn pics. At age 17 I was a 4.0 student in a private college prep school, who never got into any trouble at all, taking pics like that with all my boys (middle finger up with one hand, Grey Goose in the other). Everyone who isn't a total geek goes through that fake bad boy phase, regardless of race :stoneface: Clearly some of you haven't been to colleges with white frat boys either, go look at what kind of pics they post on FB. It's immature, not malicious
 
Last edited:
lol sure, i may be stereotyping, but everyone does. I lived in the bronx for 21 years (not anymore) and i always kept an eye out for suspicious ppl. If I see someone with a hoody over their head with the news of robberies in the neighborhood, then of-effin-course im gonna suspect the person with hoody over their head walking in the middle of the night as being a criminal. No, im not playing devil's advocate. GZ did not provoke the fight. He asked trayvon what was he doing.
Come back to me when you have proof. I won't hold my breath
you would know what im talking about if u have been watching the trial.
 
Underage nude pics :lol: dude was 17 he got some hs girls to sext him what's the big deal.. the other pictures are serious stuff but don't bring up "underage pics" he was a kid too

You dont see anything wrong with a underage girl or boy sexting. So if this was you daughter sexting you see nothing wrong with it.

You say underaged, he died at 17 so everything we see is of him when he was underaged and in my book none of it is how a underaged kid should be acting.
 
I'm open for an honest debate, PM if you'd like. I think it's been proven that someone can be killed by bare hands. I had a friend who was killed at the SF giants game in 2008 by simple blunt force trauma to the head. People have the misconception that because I agree with the verdict simply means that I agree that people can get killed without justice, I just feel that you can't prosecute someone on what may or may not have happened. Could the justice system be tweaked? Absolutely, but let's not riot over one death when they happen in every city, every day.
Sorry about your friend :smh:
 
the evidence wasn't there to convict him of murder/man slaughter in the court of law... they needed to prove he was guilty

it's really not about picking sides personally
People here aren't thinking rationally. They only see "oh he killed him, put him in jail". But they don't understand that sh*t doesn't work like that.
 
zimmerman also saw these pictures I assume, before he shot Trayvon?


gentleman, the typical Trayvon Martin supporter.



At least some of you are finally looking at some of the facts/evidence and possibly seeing how Trayvon wasn't at all as how he was portrayed by the media or refuting outright which is normal.
 
judge a man by the color of his skin, and then shoot him because of the color of his skin.  "judge" his character and if GZ was defending himself after he is dead.
 
What pictures of drugs and a gun?

And it's funny how certain people will bring up the dead kids past, but never Zimmerman's.

But then they will say I'm not racist.
See this is what i'm talking about. You defend this man-Trayvon Martin, with sword and shield while you don't even know the whole story.





http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...-whistleblower-fired-20130713,0,2426704.story


"Kruidbos testified last month that he found embarrassing photos found on Trayvon's cellphone, including pictures of a clump of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semiautomatic pistol. Defense attorneys allege that data wasn't turned over to them as part of the evidence exchange process, known as discovery."
What does this prove or disprove?

"A hand holding a semi automatic pistol?"

laugh.gif


Could not have even been him and if it was, that has nothing to do with him just buying some candy from the gas station that night.

"Underage nude females"

So girls sent him pictures? . . . So?

"A clump of jewelry on a bed"

What does this even have to do with anything?

"Marijuana plants"

. . . Okay

Dudes reaching to make it seem like Trayvon had no business doing what he was doing that night . . . If someone is following me at night and they aren't police I'm not waiting to see what they want . . . and I'm sure none of you would either.

Like I said I hope y'all are just trying to play devil's advocate
 
the evidence wasn't there to convict him of murder/man slaughter in the court of law... they needed to prove he was guilty

it's really not about picking sides personally

This, I don't understand how people don't understand this. I do agree the stand your ground law needs to be worked on, too much loose interpretation.
 
These hypocritical idiots need to shut up about the damn pics. At age 17 I was a 4.0 student in a private college prep school taking pics like that with all my boys (middle finger up with one hand, Grey Goose in the other). Everyone who isn't a total geek goes through that phase, regardless of race :stoneface: Clearly a lot of you haven't been to colleges with white frat boys

So, if you parents saw that picture you took the day after you took it, they would have nothing to say about it. They would be totally cool.

Another question would you display that picture on your desk in your office at work.
 
These hypocritical idiots need to shut up about the damn pics. At age 17 I was a 4.0 student in a private college prep school taking pics like that with all my boys (middle finger up with one hand, Grey Goose in the other). Everyone who isn't a total geek goes through that phase, regardless of race :stoneface: Clearly some of you haven't been to colleges with white frat boys. It's immature, not malicious


You really think that picture of him with the middle fingers up is the issue?






Let me help you out....It's the one of him holding a gun buddy.

Which was not given to the defense.
 
What pictures of drugs and a gun?

And it's funny how certain people will bring up the dead kids past, but never Zimmerman's.

But then they will say I'm not racist.

See this is what i'm talking about. You defend this man-Trayvon Martin, with sword and shield while you don't even know the whole story.





http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...-whistleblower-fired-20130713,0,2426704.story


"Kruidbos testified last month that he found embarrassing photos found on Trayvon's cellphone, including pictures of a clump of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semiautomatic pistol. Defense attorneys allege that data wasn't turned over to them as part of the evidence exchange process, known as discovery."


So Kruidbos couldn't possibly be lying or mistaken? :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom