- Jan 30, 2007
- 3,176
- 1,332
Game is completely different if Burnett doesnt slide.
Hard to keep running when your own teammate 5 yards in front of you is waving you to get down.
I don't really put too much blame on him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Game is completely different if Burnett doesnt slide.
When you lose a 16 point lead in the 4th quarter, its multiple things that make you lose...thats why I don't understand the Packers narrative that they were the better team
Nah he gets some blame too... Hard to say how much the calf affected his game but he absolutely missed some throws that he normally doesn't.Mike McCarthy is the sole reason GB lost yesterday. I don't blame AR at all.
I think it was Vilma this morning that said Rodgers may not have even known Sherm had an issue. And if he did, he may not have had time to look for something to attack it with.
I dunno. A receiver, or a coach, someone had to see it, right?
Rodgers said in his press conference that he knew Sherman was injured.
Disagree. There are many reasons that the Pack lost yesterday.....a huge one being Burnett sliding down after Wilson's 4th pick. At worst, he gets the ball close to field goal position. At best, he returns it for a touchdown.Mike McCarthy is the sole reason GB lost yesterday.
Game is completely different if Burnett doesnt slide.
Then when usually you see Capers go 3 man rush, he goes cover 0 instead and the top gets blown off twice.
He had miles of space to run... Decent chance at pick 6 and at the very least it puts them on the 40-30 yardline.Really? Burnett sliding affected the game? GB got exactly what they wanted, a turnover.Disagree. There are many reasons that the Pack lost yesterday.....a huge one being Burnett sliding down after Wilson's 4th pick. At worst, he gets the ball close to field goal position. At best, he returns it for a touchdown.Mike McCarthy is the sole reason GB lost yesterday.
Game is completely different if Burnett doesnt slide.
True, Hayward giving Baldwin an outside release at the hashmark and getting dusted on 3rd and 19 is terrible though.I don't really blame the coverage on that last play.Then when usually you see Capers go 3 man rush, he goes cover 0 instead and the top gets blown off twice.
1st & 10, you're expecting Lynch and then Russell just throws a perfect pass.
I dont know how you can say him sliding DIDNT affect the game. At the very least, he gets the Packers to the edge of field goal range. At most, he runs it into the endzone. Either of which would have completely changed the last 5 minutes of the game.Really? Burnett sliding affected the game? GB got exactly what they wanted, a turnover.Disagree. There are many reasons that the Pack lost yesterday.....a huge one being Burnett sliding down after Wilson's 4th pick. At worst, he gets the ball close to field goal position. At best, he returns it for a touchdown.Mike McCarthy is the sole reason GB lost yesterday.
Game is completely different if Burnett doesnt slide.
I did nothing, I just said game manager isn't a negative and pointed out who has been and hasn't been one
I gotta get work done, this forum is going to get me fired
Disagree. There are many reasons that the Pack lost yesterday.....a huge one being Burnett sliding down after Wilson's 4th pick. At worst, he gets the ball close to field goal position. At best, he returns it for a touchdown.Mike McCarthy is the sole reason GB lost yesterday.
Game is completely different if Burnett doesnt slide.
Really? Burnett sliding affected the game? GB got exactly what they wanted, a turnover.
I dont know how you can say him sliding DIDNT affect the game. At the very least, he gets the Packers to the edge of field goal range. At most, he runs it into the endzone. Either of which would have completely changed the last 5 minutes of the game.
Disagree. There are many reasons that the Pack lost yesterday.....a huge one being Burnett sliding down after Wilson's 4th pick. At worst, he gets the ball close to field goal position. At best, he returns it for a touchdown.Mike McCarthy is the sole reason GB lost yesterday.
Game is completely different if Burnett doesnt slide.
Really? Burnett sliding affected the game? GB got exactly what they wanted, a turnover.
I dont know how you can say him sliding DIDNT affect the game. At the very least, he gets the Packers to the edge of field goal range. At most, he runs it into the endzone. Either of which would have completely changed the last 5 minutes of the game.
How about GB running into the line 3 straight times then putting the defense back on the field who then proceeded to give up a TD?
-One of only three QBs in NFL history to throw for 50 touchdowns in their first two seasons.
I remember another Seattle fan had that 50 TD in 2 years thing HOLLERIN last year.
Then this year happened, and Luck threw 40 in one year, and I never saw that stat no mo.
Whoops.
Russ got 72 after 3 years tho.
Luck got 86.
Dalton had 80
Through four games of his rookie year, RGIII had a 69.35% completion percentage. An NFL record.
Derek Carr holds the NFL record for most passes by a rookie through five weeks (8 of them).
I can pull all kinds of random records and **** too.
Most passing yards in a playoff game by a rookie.
I mean, there are lots of things you can use to prop Russ up -- some videos, gifs, game-winning drives...
But you choose most passing yards in a playoff game by a rookie.
Its like us Niner fans cant have an opinion on a player on a rival team without the standard "biased", "you mad", "salty", or "hater" being in the response.You got me there -- I spend all of my time on NT propping up 49ers and their players. Lord knows all the times I said Kaep is better than Brady.
I mean, I say Seattle's defense is the best I've probably ever seen... but that's the 49er bias.
I say Marshawn Lynch is the best RB in the NFL... but that's the 49er bias.
If I were to hate any player for not being on the 49ers, there are plenty I'd choose before Russell Wilson.