I just dont get this whole im a christian, but i dont actually follow and adhere to the bible and its teachings, in fact in some respects do the exact opposite of what i profess to be...but its justified because i show up somewhere on sunday, or i state im not perfect.
In no other aspect would this be accepted or seen credible. Would we not question iuno a vegan who profess to be one, but yet in still has a fridge full of ribs, with a hamburger in one hand and a drumstick in the other. Could they say oh i know i eat meat etc... but hey im not perfect...so because im not perfect so im still a vegan
Would we not question a drug addict/alcoholic who claims sobriety, yet hangs out in bars/corners... and you see them with a 40 oz in one hand, and a shooter in the other... if they said ok yea im shooting up and drunk...but hey im not perfect, and i attend na/aa meetings so therefore im am living sober living...
Why does religion, in particular christianity gets a pass? Why is it you can claim and profess to practice and be apart of something without actually practicing it, and performing, and adhering to the very thing you claim that you do? And why do you get a pass just off the premise of "im not perfect" or a tithe, i go to church.
Like i said if a addict goes to na/aa meetings swears he will never drink/snort again, should we give him a pass and say he is sober living despite the fact he still still does drugs/drinks?