jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 58,710
- 28,042
You were following him. That's how I came to follow him.Originally Posted by h3at23
Amare to NYK was from a fake twitter account. That's why I always say you should know for sure who ur following
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You were following him. That's how I came to follow him.Originally Posted by h3at23
Amare to NYK was from a fake twitter account. That's why I always say you should know for sure who ur following
Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Steve Cash aka Billy Hoyle aka Mateen Cleaves...
Fits the bill.Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Steve Cash aka Billy Hoyle aka Mateen Cleaves...
Originally Posted by Bleezys and Heem
Originally Posted by NobleKane
i think mike miller aint that good. all he can do is shoot. i rather have tmac or ray allen. im glad they set a deadline. dude aint gonna sign cuz hes gonna be too busy washing lebron's car tonight
i think McGrady would be a great move for LA, Mike Miller is done IMO, he wasn't even that great of shooter this past season and if dude loses that, he can't bring anything else to the table - he isn't mobile anymore and I think the Lakers need more than just a shooter coming off that bench. That's why I think TMac would be the best fit, it could be a bust move or a home-run for LA.
I don't think Ray Allen would even contemplate coming to the Lakers after battling against them these recent years + he has always disliked Kobe. I think he will stay with Boston.
Originally Posted by JPZx
You were following him. That's how I came to follow him.Originally Posted by h3at23
Amare to NYK was from a fake twitter account. That's why I always say you should know for sure who ur following
How much money is Scola looking to make next year?Originally Posted by franchise3
Battier is a great glue guy, but he's in the last year of his deal. Ariza is the SF of the future, so he should stay in any potential deal. Definitely both won't be shipped off, because a signed Scola + Battier/Ariza will be close or basically match what Bosh/Amare would make.
Scola is tough and gritty, but he's not on the same level as Amare or Bosh.
Originally Posted by bijald0331
LamarOwnsem said:If you don't want Miller because all he can do is shoot, then why do you want Allen? And McGrady hasn't proven anything for us to consider signing him.Originally Posted by NobleKane
i think mike miller aint that good. all he can do is shoot. i rather have tmac or ray allen. im glad they set a deadline. dude aint gonna sign cuz hes gonna be too busy washing lebron's car tonight
My exact thoughts. Ray Allen might a little more valuable than Mike right now but he is getting really old and a long term deal with him is kind of risky. A lot of Allen's game is running around and getting around screens and what not; I don't how much longer he can keep it up. Plus, he can't dribble or drive to save his life.
Mike Miller is done but TMac isn't? Lulz.
This. The other parts of Mike Miller's game are underrated.Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
You're going off his rep as just a shooter. He's a capable ball handler, solid rebounder and a good passer.Originally Posted by NobleKane
i think mike miller aint that good. all he can do is shoot. i rather have tmac or ray allen. im glad they set a deadline. dude aint gonna sign cuz hes gonna be too busy washing lebron's car tonight
See then I start to question, is Brooks, Martin, Battier, and Yao (who's a GIANT question mark), enough to lure a Bosh or Amare?Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Gotta dangle one of the young PFs (Hill or Patterson) and the Knicks picks with Scola and Ariza to fetch Bosh or Amare.
Yeah I agree, I've ALWAYS liked his potential. Sounds stupid, but I felt like if he gets the opporutnity, he'll start to shine. Not 20/10 type shine, but enough of a shine where he'll be extremely great pickup for someone. I think he'll sprout now that Bosh is gone.Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
I would just like to go on record and say that I fully expect Amir Johnson to be a value at ~$7 million per.
I suppose, but we all know Bosh really wants to go to Dallas instead.Originally Posted by franchise3
Battier is making like 7M and Ariza nearly 7M.
Max deal for these dudes start off at 16.6 I believe. Scola starting at 9M per or so, which is more than reasonable taking into account his production, and the team will get a starting PF back to fill the void, is a succesful trade. And that's not including picks.
Something's gotta give somewhere, regardless with Houston.
PF Scola - Hill - Patterson
SF Battier - Ariza - Chase
Um, if it's a S+T, they still get the max money. Am I missing something? My point was if Yao is out, does Amare/Bosh make them a contender? No? Then why would either want to a S+T there?Originally Posted by franchise3
No Yao = the Rockets were still basically a .500 team. Amare or Bosh should only help the cause if Yao is out, and further the cause if he's there.
And what it's really about JA, like you been saying, do these two want to leave 30M on the table.
Do the math. We have 10 maximum-salary slots among the free-agent contenders: three for Miami, two for Chicago, New York and New Jersey, and one for the Clippers.
We have 10 players who are max-contract candidates: LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, Dirk Nowitzki, Paul Pierce, Amare Stoudemire, Carlos Boozer, Joe Johnson, David Lee and Rudy Gay.
Seems like a perfect match of supply and demand so far. However, Pierce and Nowitzki are almost certain to return to their former teams. Gay already has committed to return to Memphis, and Johnson appears close to returning to Atlanta.
Now we have six players for 10 slots. If LeBron returns to Cleveland, that makes five. And we haven't discussed the possibility of Boozer, Stoudemire or Bosh being signed-and-traded to a team already over the cap -- a real possibility given the lucrative sixth year they can add on their deals in such an arrangement.
If all that happens, that means it's possible only Wade and Lee (by re-signing six-year deals with their current teams) would eat up max-salary slots from one of the teams with cap space.
Which would leave about $120 million in cap space out on the market, chasing a bunch of players who aren't worth anywhere near that type of money.
Think about it. After those players, who's next on the list? Luis Scola? Raymond Felton? John Salmons? Josh Childress? Ray Allen?
Whoever it was that said they hate the idea of teams gutting their roster for cap space, this is exactly why it's so ugly. Potentially 6/7 guys for 10 max contract spots...
Originally Posted by franchise3
Battier is making like 7M and Ariza nearly 7M.
Max deal for these dudes start off at 16.6 I believe. Scola starting at 9M per or so, which is more than reasonable taking into account his production, and the team will get a starting PF back to fill the void, is a succesful trade. And that's not including picks.
Something's gotta give somewhere, regardless with Houston.
PF Scola - Hill - Patterson
SF Battier - Ariza - Chase