- Jul 18, 2012
- 607
- 124
To the Liberals of NT, hypothetically if Obama loses, what will you blame his loss on? Would it be the debate, or something else?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't speak for anyone else but for me?To the Liberals of NT, hypothetically if Obama loses, what will you blame his loss on? Would it be the debate, or something else?
To the Liberals of NT, hypothetically if Obama loses, what will you blame his loss on? Would it be the debate, or something else?
To the Liberals of NT, hypothetically if Obama loses, what will you blame his loss on? Would it be the debate, or something else?
To the Liberals of NT, hypothetically if Obama loses, what will you blame his loss on? Would it be the debate, or something else?
he's da one who said if he didn't have da economy running and unemployment at under 8% that his presidency would be a one term proposition.Peoples inability to research/collect the facts for themselves, and unrealistic expectations that Obama should have had the country running like a fine tuned machine by now after what he inherited.To the Liberals of NT, hypothetically if Obama loses, what will you blame his loss on? Would it be the debate, or something else?
Debates at the end of the day shouldn't matter. Polices/Stances haven't changed, well they have for Mitt, but people are so quick to forget **** from 6 months ago, and the debates are so close to the election they somehow play a major role.
ALL IMO
he's da one who said if he didn't have da economy running and unemployment at under 8% that his presidency would be a one term proposition.
Had Obama shown up and did what he did in Debate 2 & Debate 3 in the 1st Debate this election would have been a blow out.
To the Liberals of NT, hypothetically if Obama loses, what will you blame his loss on? Would it be the debate, or something else?
-I'll blame it on moderates drinking the same cool-aid Bush was serving up in 2000. It is like people don't remember the craziness that followed Bush to Washington. If you are voting for Mitt, your are also cosigning all the foolishness of the GOP.
-On the Obama campaign: I think they needed to be more aggressive in showing Mitt's lies. Mitt straight up makes **** up, maybe he does it so frequently they can't keep up but if he is able to lie his way into being President the only people you can blame for letting that happen in the Obama campign
However I still don't think Obama is going to lose.
he's da one who said if he didn't have da economy running and unemployment at under 8% that his presidency would be a one term proposition.
They don't. They'll vote ABO regardless of policy, lies, and flip flops.Im starting to think that people dont care about Mitt's lies or flip flops. Not everybody of course, but alot of people Ive talked to about the election actually believe the things that he says, even if he flip flops from a previous statement.
well there we go b, not for nothing, i know you know what you talking about (bill nye did a video on he basically is at a net minus when it comes energyNinjahood, you are seriously misinformed. As a recent graduate from stony brook with a bachelors of engineering in electrical engineering let me correct you, there are a swarm of jobs in the energy and communications industry. Solar, geo-thermal, wind, bio-fuel, infrared, ultraviolet, sound, vibration. There is so much demand in our industry it's a joke. Within a year of working for sharps solar energy department i went from an intern to a senior designer/ project manager at one of their corporate centers here in ny, with a salary increase of almost double. Green jobs are paying big bucks because demand is so high. Thanks to obama, solar is dirt cheap. One can install a 10kw system and only have pay about 8-7 grand out of pocket. Incentives and rebates takes care of the rest. Not to mention the 2-4 year payback.its STILL inaccurate information because that whole industry is depends on government tax breaks, if those companies were run on UNsubsidzed funds like bain captial
investments, da failure rate would be alot higher.
da fact of da matter is, there is NO demand for green jobs...
obama talks about wind and solar like its da next thing smoking
Obama also brought back and made in to affect affect the energy policy that carter instilled that reagan later killed; which requires that a small percentage of every states' energy come from solar or wind. EVery year that number increases, and when states don't make quota they have to pay a MASSIVE fine every day it isn't met. As a result, the SREC market was born (read up). The SREc market is the exchange of Solar Renewable Energy Credits. When states don't meet quota, an alternative for them is to purchase renewable energy credits from homeowners and businesses who've installed solar panels on their home or business. States are able to apply this credit towards their quota. These credits can fetch big bucks in some states. A credit can be worth up too $600 for every megawatt produced.
Let's do the math. Assuming you install a 10kw system on your roof. Total cost of installation is about 34 grand. With a federal, state, and utility rebate, plus additional tax credits, you're looking at a out of pocket cost of 7-8 grand. Your panels are producing energy even when you're not using any, so by default it goes right back to the grid which means your local power utility is buying that excess electricity from you. But what about the srec? Say no more! A 10kw system produces energy at a rate of 10kw/ hr. A megawatt is a million watts. For every million watts produced, you've just earned yourself an srec. Say in a worst case scenario, you're only able to get 9 hours of sunlight; which is equivalent to 90kw a day. Assuming you produce 90kw of electricity a day, within two weeks you'd have produced a megawatt of energy, which in turn translates into an srec. You can now sell that srec to your state, and if you live in Massachusetts, they're worth about $600. That's $600 every two weeks!!!!
LMFAOO at your whole comment. Read up boy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_renewable_energy_certificate
http://www.indeed.com/salary/Sharp-Solar-Energy-Solutions-Group.html
Ohh, and if anyone is looking for a job at sharp as a solar project engineer, an add was posted a couple days ago:
http://www.campuscareercenter.com/full_jobs/1823437/Sharp_Solar/Solar_Sr_Project_Engineer_SI.html
Ninjahood, you're free to apply
EDIT: I will agree with you on one thing. That the renewable energy industry is heavily dependent on rebates and tax breaks. But than again so is oil. Real value of oil is about 18 bucks a gallon. The government subsidized the heck out of it so we only have to pay a mere 3.79 at the pump.
2009: Q1 -5.3 percent |
2009: Q2 -0.3 percent |
2009: Q3 1.4 percent |
2009: Q4 4.0 percent |
2010: Q1 2.3 percent |
2010: Q2 2.2 percent |
2010: Q3 2.6 percent |
2010: Q4 2.4 percent |
2011: Q1 0.1 percent |
2011: Q2 2.5 percent |
2011: Q3 1.3 percent |
2011: Q4 4.1 percent |
2012: Q1 2.0 percent |
2012: Q2 1.3 percent |
2012: Q3 2.0 percent |
well there we go b, not for nothing, i know you know what you talking about (bill nye did a video on he basically is at a net minus when it comes energy
comsumption) but i dont put too much water in a industry that:
A. has so little effect on da total generation of energy in this country on a grand scale
B. a industry thats basically propped up by political legislation and is vulnerable to where ever da political winds blow.
and did someone say da economy is VASTLY improved under obama? lulz
2009: Q1 -5.3 percent 2009: Q2 -0.3 percent 2009: Q3 1.4 percent 2009: Q4 4.0 percent 2010: Q1 2.3 percent 2010: Q2 2.2 percent 2010: Q3 2.6 percent 2010: Q4 2.4 percent 2011: Q1 0.1 percent 2011: Q2 2.5 percent 2011: Q3 1.3 percent 2011: Q4 4.1 percent 2012: Q1 2.0 percent 2012: Q2 1.3 percent
2012: Q3 2.0 percent
thats our GDP growth in his 4 years as president.
to call it sputtering would be a compliment.
and unemployment numbers under 8%? lulz a pol that basically ignores when people are so fed up with looking for jobs that it doesn't count them when they drop out
of da job market?
im not gonna even post da unemployment rates for blacks and latinos cuz its embarrassing. there's a REASON his black constituent has been so mad at him..son
doesn't address da elephant of da room, da plight of da minorities, how they're warehousing ******, how his own home city is plagued by murders of blacks by
other blacks. da rampant deportation of my fellow hispanics, breaking up families, da flip flopping of legislation some kind of measure that would end da senseless
war on drugs at least on a weed level
obama has been a let down in so many ways, and it goes far beyond da economy.
A) It will have a large affect on our countries energy production. People said the same thing about hybrid and electric cars in 2002. ten years later everyone drives a hyrbid or eco-car.well there we go b, not for nothing, i know you know what you talking about (bill nye did a video on he basically is at a net minus when it comes energy
comsumption) but i dont put too much water in a industry that:
A. has so little effect on da total generation of energy in this country on a grand scale
B. a industry thats basically propped up by political legislation and is vulnerable to where ever da political winds blow.
and did someone say da economy is VASTLY improved under obama? lulz
2009: Q1 -5.3 percent 2009: Q2 -0.3 percent 2009: Q3 1.4 percent 2009: Q4 4.0 percent 2010: Q1 2.3 percent 2010: Q2 2.2 percent 2010: Q3 2.6 percent 2010: Q4 2.4 percent 2011: Q1 0.1 percent 2011: Q2 2.5 percent 2011: Q3 1.3 percent 2011: Q4 4.1 percent 2012: Q1 2.0 percent 2012: Q2 1.3 percent 2012: Q3 2.0 percent
thats our GDP growth in his 4 years as president.
to call it sputtering would be a compliment.
and unemployment numbers under 8%? lulz a pol that basically ignores when people are so fed up with looking for jobs that it doesn't count them when they drop out
of da job market?
im not gonna even post da unemployment rates for blacks and latinos cuz its embarrassing. there's a REASON his black constituent has been so mad at him..son
doesn't address da elephant of da room, da plight of da minorities, how they're warehousing ******, how his own home city is plagued by murders of blacks by
other blacks. da rampant deportation of my fellow hispanics, breaking up families, da flip flopping of legislation some kind of measure that would end da senseless
war on drugs at least on a weed level
obama has been a let down in so many ways, and it goes far beyond da economy.
B) And the same applies to oil. Subsidizing oil is no different. If it weren't for political legislation price of oil would be around $18 a gallon.
Idk if you're reading that survey correctly, but it proves against your favor that the gdp has increased since obama has come into office, with an influx of losses and gains. Marginally speaking, the gdp has increased a total of 7% since obama came into office.
Unemployment is below 8%! Just accept it that things have gotten a lot better since 2008. I swear, republicans don't want unemployment to go down. It would prove obama's actually doing his job. Which he is.
If obama brought unemployment down to 0%, if everyone had high paying jobs, if there was peace in the middle east, admit it--you still wouldn't vote obama. Admit it, it's not about economics, it's not about foreign policy, and it's not a bout gdp. What is it?
if obama was doing is ******g job of course id vote for him, i would LOVE to know what you was implying there.
son out here mooching it up wit sway on MTV talking about how he listens to hiphop (which just screams desperation because you aint doing
anything about da crime or struggle these rap song tell you in da lyrics)
instead of talking about what really happened in libya with our diplomats, its type insincere.
da difference between me and alot of other cats up in here is i dont have to like da president to respect him, and i dont have to respect someone to like
them. da 2 terms are mutually exclusive.
bloomberg for example is someone i don't really care for, but i can't front like he hasn't been a blessing to NYC, dinkins was a cat i liked, doesn't mean
he was a great mayor.
so government subsidized purchases is indicative of EVERYONE? lulzOhh yea i forgot heights people don't drive.They stay between 168th street and dyckman so mass transit is how ya'll commute. If you'de actually leave your block, you'de notice that cop cars and taxis are now overwhelmingly hybrid. Long island is full of prius's and hybrids. The world is full of eco-cars and hybrids. I guess in dyckman all you see is drug dealers driving range rovers and beamers so one can understand your limited view on the issue. I personally drive a 2011 highlander hybrid.if obama was doing is ******g job of course id vote for him, i would LOVE to know what you was implying there.
son out here mooching it up wit sway on MTV talking about how he listens to hiphop (which just screams desperation because you aint doing
anything about da crime or struggle these rap song tell you in da lyrics)
instead of talking about what really happened in libya with our diplomats, its type insincere.
da difference between me and alot of other cats up in here is i dont have to like da president to respect him, and i dont have to respect someone to like
them. da 2 terms are mutually exclusive.
bloomberg for example is someone i don't really care for, but i can't front like he hasn't been a blessing to NYC, dinkins was a cat i liked, doesn't mean
he was a great mayor.
I was insinuating that you like most other republicans are ABO. I'll take that back though.
Again there is very little obama can do about inner city crime. That is in the control of local government!! Something that republicans should be a fan of, unless you're flip floping to prove a weak point..