- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
Dude miss me with this nonsense. Like piss off.You realize you are asking for evidence that he did something while you have provided no evidence that he didn't? Other than speculation... same as me.
We both mentioned logical reasons for our argument. Like you stated, my argument requires giving Trump the benefit of the doubt. Just because you don't want to give him that doesn't mean that the reasoning isn't valid.
PR is a logical reason to sign the act. So wouldn't it also be good PR to be against it being undermined?
Talk about ridiculous logic.
You are just trolling me.
So I have to prove a negative. This is a clear logical fallacy...
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Argument-from-Ignorance
This is exact behavior Meth has warned you about. Warned you that you could get banned for it. Yet you continue it do it.
You might of clean up some of your act, put you are still the bad faith troll you have always been.
BTW, since I cited other instances of Trump publicly and privately criticizing the DOJ, and pointed out that Trump has done something similar in regards to them undermining the first step act, the fact that you couldn't fine examples, backs up my claim.
Last edited: