Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 33,926
- 81,140
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's like spending your day arguing with a lib.I unblocked Delk just to see what was up. Holy smokes. You guys entertain that guy so much he probably feels like a local celebrity. This thread is trash with him unblocked. It’s like spending your day arguing with a wall.
I understand your gripe. It is just better aimed at congress/the SBA. And just as a point of information it says "[t]his advance is designed to provide economic relief to businesses that are currently experiencing a temporary loss of revenue."
DON'T YOU WORRY, COMRADE. That was just some Sarcasm to Trigger the libs.So much for “cough in my face bro”
I’m still voting trump, future said it best. “Mask off” no truer words have ever been spoken. I will not be oppressed by a mask while I’m shopping for mulch for my yard. No way.
I didn’t wear a mask in the coal mines and I’m not about to start now. The masks are all about government control! If you can smell a fart through your pants you can catch the wuhan hoax through your lib face mask!
TRUMP POWRRRR!
if its legalIt’s perfectly legal for a millionaire to scrape every last coin out of a “leave a penny, take a penny” tray at a convenience store, then swing by the local soup kitchen for a free meal.
Most people, however, possess a sense of ethics that exist independently of what the law allows.
Even if it's not legal, but you think it should be legalif its legal
then whats the issue
if its legal
then whats the issue
Even if it's not legal, but you think it should be legal
then what's the issue?
amirite alan?
It has more to do with the hypocrisy of Republicans and fiscal conservatives when it comes to government spending. Their partaking in the "fraud" reveals that greed, not thrift, is the underlying reason why they support austerity measures. At least, libertarians are honest about why they support smaller government.However, I feel most peoples anger when hearing things like this stem from the perception between "white collar" system milking and the "blue collar" correspondent.
I for one give no dambs what anyone does to the "system", whether it's falsifying info to get more money or finding loopholes to qualify for things they shouldn't be qualified for. Would I do it? No, because I'm not built like that.
However, I feel most peoples anger when hearing things like this stem from the perception between "white collar" system milking and the "blue collar" correspondent.
If someone lies on their welfare form to get an extra $200 a week, or if someone falsified something on a food stamp document to get a little extra, people bash them for taking advantage. They should work harder, they should stop stealing taxpayer money, etc.
Yet, if there's the white collar version of this, such as people with millions applying for PPP because they don't wanna dive into their savings, or if someone pretends to be injured to collect disability and chill with their kids, or someone taking a $1000 grant because "why not?" It's not perceived with the same disgust or judgment.
It has more to do with the hypocrisy of Republicans and fiscal conservatives when it comes to government spending. Their partaking in the "fraud" reveals that greed, not thrift, is the underlying reason why they support austerity measures. At least, libertarians are honest about why they support smaller government.
Jesus . You pay AMEX for a yearly membership. This is an additional perk. This is an absolutely nonsensical parallel.My Amex platinum, is now giving out $40/month in credits for wireless service and streaming services, $200 in credits in August for travel. Is taking advantage of the additional credits unethical because I don't need $40/month? Of course not
Jesus . You pay AMEX for a yearly membership. This is an additional perk. This is an absolutely nonsensical parallel.
Sidenote, I had a friend who received a stimulus check earlier in the year because she hadn’t filed their taxes yet, so the IRS was basing her income off of her stub year after graduating from law school. She turned around and donated her stimulus check to a family in need during this time, as she realized that the intent of the stimulus was not for people like her. Of course, this isn’t required, but when people like DWalk flaunt getting a $1000 check for selling while tons of Black small businesses who haven’t received them are floundering, it definitely stands out.
By chance, are the sign-up bonuses offered by your wireless carrier and credit card provider funded by taxpayers as part of a limited emergency disaster relief program that has received far more applications than available resources? If not, this isn't the best comparison.Do I need these discounts to survive? No. Is taking advantage of them unethical? No.
3.3. RESTRICTIONS ON APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY You should determine the eligibility of the owner prior to addressing the credit worthiness of the applicants and the repayment of the loan.
A. Businesses Considered as Hobbies: Some endeavors constitute hobbies of the owner even though they are organized as a business. As hobbies, they are not eligible for physical loss or EIDL assistance. If you have reason to believe that an endeavor is in fact a hobby, determine if IRS has reviewed the business status. In the absence of an IRS review, consider whether the business is properly licensed by appropriate authorities, and whether reasonable efforts have been made to operate as a business rather than a hobby.