- Feb 5, 2013
- 8,295
- 7,534
Drippin that swagguTrump sweatin. He pop a molly?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Drippin that swagguTrump sweatin. He pop a molly?
he’s just fat.
STAHPI'm convinced that Trump could call Delk a racial slur to his face and he would proudly accept it and be first on line to vote for him. He would also tell us that Trump's inexperience caused him to use the slur then he would pivot to the Crime Bill and finish it off with reference to the First Step Act.
To add to this... shingles is no joke.And sure you can go "Well chickenpox is a joke, who needs that vaccine?". I get it. Chickenpox vaccination wasn't a thing when I was kid. Hell didn't even exist in America when I was born. It wasn't fun having it, but I survived. Everyone I've ever known that's had it survived. It is deadly but that's rare. But I would never willingly put my children through the now unnecessary discomfort I went through because I'm worried about what, autism? Hell even if I decide to not vaccinate them my kids will likely never experience chickenpox through the sheer power of herd immunization.
This is a fair take. For consistency's sake, do you apply this same logic to local administrations? For example, can you separate the Mayor of New York City from the acts of the police chief in New York City? Or is that not possible because the Mayor appointed him? Same for Atlanta, etc.
This was starting to hit me, until I realized that you literally tagged me in response to someone asking which staff is an anti-vaxxer. I'm not, but your response right here replying that I jumped to conclusions would have hit a lot harder if you didn't... jump... to conclusions. You're trying to suggest that I should have asked more questions or asked what motivated your position or asked you to expand on it... despite the fact that you did none of those things. It's literally reprimanding me for things I didn't do in labeling you... while ignoring that you didn't do those same things but labeled me... while ALSO ignoring that the first label from either one of us came from you labeling me an antivaxxer as a response to someone else's inquiry.I was not behaving in the manner you ascribe to me, as a absolute thinker, an extremist, that blindly supports everything a doctor says. You didn't ask me what motivated my position, you didn't ask me to expand on it, you just spewed some conjecture because I appeared a certain way to you. And that is whatever, that would be fine, if you were just doing that. But again, you were taking issue with me seemingly falsely labeling you anti-vax.
To add to this... shingles is no joke.
Children who got vaccinated now won't get shingles when they're older. About 1/3rd of us who got chickenpox rather than the vaccine will though.
nobody is worried about the stuff that goes on your roof. It’s just a flu you cowards
My bad. Sometimes my sense of humor doesn't come across on message boards.nobody is worried about the stuff that goes on your roof. It’s just a flu you cowards
My bad. Sometimes my sense of humor doesn't come across on message boards.
Let me be serious for a sec: cough on me bro!
Not all vaxx are for previous global pandemics like polio and yellow fever.I just don't see how one can be pro SOME vaccines. Like how can you go "Man that polio vaccine was a great thing but the yellow fever vaccine? I just don't trust it. It's shady."
TIL darthska is an anti vaxxer. Wild times. Welcome to the RIGHT side of history, coalbro
Your post is highly misleading. Vaccines undergo a very specific approval process outlined by the FDA. There is no vaccine being sold and administered that hasn't followed these guidelines. Like, I have no idea what your strep throat example is even trying to compare.Not all vaxx are for previous global pandemics like polio and yellow fever.
Also, longitudinal studies have not been completed for all vaccinations required for children.
Literally the testing hasn't been completed but they are required. In what context could a doctor tell you 'Well your kid needs this, but we haven't completed testing on it. Are we a go?', and you nod your head yes? I have only heard of people nodding their head yes in that situation when it comes to vaccinations. Bring your kid in for strep throat? 'OK, so we just got this stuff in last week. Testing hasn't been completed on it yet, but I'm pretty sure it will knock this strep throat out by tomorrow. We good?' The next logical response for nearly all parents would be 'Wait, what do you mean testing hasn't been completed for it yet?'
But not now, and I really fear that it's because people don't want to be labeled 'Anti-vaxxer!', and I fear that people fear THAT because people ARE being labeled anti-vaxxers for just being critical. Shut up and support or be shamed.
Watch how many people double down on labeling me anti-vaxx now moving forward, which is weird considering my fully vaccinated child that I'm the primary guardian of.
Your post is highly misleading. Vaccines undergo a very specific approval process outlined by the FDA. There is no vaccine being sold and administered that hasn't followed these guidelines. Like, I have no idea what your strep throat example is even trying to compare.
I work in medical devices. The amount of effort that goes into proving a product is safe and effective so that the FDA will approve it is insane. We aren't just coming up with random **** and selling it.
The reason we have to wait so long for a covid-19 vaccine is that they have to do widespread testing and wait long enough to see if there are any side effects.Your post is highly misleading. Vaccines undergo a very specific approval process outlined by the FDA. There is no vaccine being sold and administered that hasn't followed these guidelines. Like, I have no idea what your strep throat example is even trying to compare.
I was just about to say what doctors are pushing wholly untested medicines on children?Your post is highly misleading. Vaccines undergo a very specific approval process outlined by the FDA. There is no vaccine being sold and administered that hasn't followed these guidelines. Like, I have no idea what your strep throat example is even trying to compare.
I work in medical devices. The amount of effort that goes into proving a product is safe and effective so that the FDA will approve it is insane. We aren't just coming up with random **** and selling it.
The reason we have to wait so long for a covid-19 vaccine is that they have to do widespread testing and wait long enough to see if there are any side effects.
It also takes a long time to produce all those injectable microchips and program them to transmit 5g signals to a computer running Microsoft Windows ME. Repeated BSOD is easily adding 2-3 months to the development period.
Not all vaxx are for previous global pandemics like polio and yellow fever.
Also, longitudinal studies have not been completed for all vaccinations required for children.
Literally the testing hasn't been completed but they are required. In what context could a doctor tell you 'Well your kid needs this, but we haven't completed testing on it. Are we a go?', and you nod your head yes? I have only heard of people nodding their head yes in that situation when it comes to vaccinations. Bring your kid in for strep throat? 'OK, so we just got this stuff in last week. Testing hasn't been completed on it yet, but I'm pretty sure it will knock this strep throat out by tomorrow. We good?' The next logical response for nearly all parents would be 'Wait, what do you mean testing hasn't been completed for it yet?'
But not now, and I really fear that it's because people don't want to be labeled 'Anti-vaxxer!', and I fear that people fear THAT because people ARE being labeled anti-vaxxers for just being critical. Shut up and support or be shamed.
Watch how many people double down on labeling me anti-vaxx now moving forward, which is weird considering my fully vaccinated child that I'm the primary guardian of.
Your post is highly misleading. Vaccines undergo a very specific approval process outlined by the FDA. There is no vaccine being sold and administered that hasn't followed these guidelines. Like, I have no idea what your strep throat example is even trying to compare.
I work in medical devices. The amount of effort that goes into proving a product is safe and effective so that the FDA will approve it is insane. We aren't just coming up with random **** and selling it.
-Someone asked a question based on a previous post of mine, I tagged you because you were the person I alluded to in my post. That's it why you were tagged. The other person's question was motivated my something I said. They didn't just randomly post it and I used that as the opportunity to bait you.This was starting to hit me, until I realized that you literally tagged me in response to someone asking which staff is an anti-vaxxer. I'm not, but your response right here replying that I jumped to conclusions would have hit a lot harder if you didn't... jump... to conclusions. You're trying to suggest that I should have asked more questions or asked what motivated your position or asked you to expand on it... despite the fact that you did none of those things. It's literally reprimanding me for things I didn't do in labeling you... while ignoring that you didn't do those same things but labeled me... while ALSO ignoring that the first label from either one of us came from you labeling me an antivaxxer as a response to someone else's inquiry.
That aside, it did still hit: I did jump to conclusions (extremist, absolute thinking), and I shouldn't have. No need for me to keep that up. Yeah, I was frustrated with the antivaxx tag, but I should have further explained my position or questioned yours, like you said. My bad.
Please consider what you wrote....
You claim I see the topic as binary, you put me on one side of the argument, then you go onto ascribe behavior to people on that side the argument, i.e. me. That is what I am calling out, you tied behavior to me I didn't display. While taking issue that I didn't consider you can a centrist position on vaccines. Hence why I said you were strawmanning me, and why I called you a hypocrite.
On NT I have always disagreed with anti-vaxxers, but in the past I have said I understand why people get to that place, even though I think there are flaws in their analysis. In my original post to Based Jesus I was voicing my displeasure with the flaws in their analysis. I didn't say anything that came close to someone saying talk it just because a doctor says take it. I am supportive of vaccines, but my views are motivated by more than just blind faith in a doctor's opinion.
I was not behaving in the manner you ascribe to me, as a absolute thinker, an extremist, that blindly supports everything a doctor says. You didn't ask me what motivated my position, you didn't ask me to expand on it, you just spewed some conjecture because I appeared a certain way to you. And that is whatever, that would be fine, if you were just doing that. But again, you were taking issue with me seemingly falsely labeling you anti-vax. So again, you are just a pot calling the kettle Dominicano.
I perfectly fine with staff members having different opinions than mine. But I also think it is perfectly fine for me to take issue with post and opinions I disagree with. I called it a word salad because it was just some conjecture about how I supposedly view things. So were not responding to me, you were responding to what you think my position on the issue is.
Someone asked me who I was referring to from a previous post. A post where I didn't mention your name. That is why I tagged you. I didn't do it to bait you into an argument in hopes of ridiculing you. Maybe you should go back and read the previous page.