***Official Political Discussion Thread***

So republican's want bernie to be the candidate, the russians want bernie to be the candidate, democrats want bernie to be the candidate. What the **** am I missing here?
My biggest concern with Bernie is that the GOP can use socialism as a boogeyman to frighten a lot of voters. My guess is they’re betting on that working well for them. We all know they have no real message or beliefs.
 
"Do what, tell the my truth."

FIFU

Rev Dr. MLK Jr. doesnt need an interpreter. Didnt then and doesnt now.
:lol: :lol:
Dude no one is trying to interpret his words. I am saying you are stripping the historic context of them to use it as evidence for your hot take.
 
My biggest concern with Bernie is that the GOP can use socialism as a boogeyman to frighten a lot of voters. My guess is they’re betting on that working well for them. We all know they have no real message or beliefs.

I mean, that's been my concern all along as well. That and the threat of paying more taxes. I know people who are voting for Trump solely because they are getting an extra $20 a month out of the tax cuts.
 
If you find anyone else gleefully engaged in semantic hairsplitting to antagonize users and deliberately obfuscate or sidetrack the discussion, you feel free to report them, okay?

In the meantime, know that this behavior is defined as trolling -and will be treated as such.

Someone reported me? For my response? Seriously....

It’s as if my comments in this thread are held to a different set of rules than other posters.
 
Got a feeling that a lot of folks will be more open to a higher tax rate,especially when it's gonna apply to every bracket, when you're offering safety from bankruptcy in the event of illness/medical emergency at the same time...

So republican's want bernie to be the candidate, the russians want bernie to be the candidate, democrats want bernie to be the candidate. What the **** am I missing here?
A longtime geopolitical foe preferring 2 anti-establishment candidates isn't a shock

Republicans have been sounding like a lot of mainstream Dems who wanted to see 45 get the nom last time because they thought he'd be the easiest opponent underestimating the real power of populism in times of mass disillusionment with the current state of affairs.

There's a reason why 45 has reportedly been shook of Bernie behind the scenes, according to inside leaks. He's seen him get a round of applause from his own voters after listening to his message at town halls in deep red states and knows he won't be able to fake the funk about fighting for regular people and 'draining the swamp' the same way he did in '16 :lol:
 
just blame the deep state bro :lol:


QAnon trying take down da sea lion. :smh:

Are these posts considered as posts meant to antagonize? Methodical Management Methodical Management ?

I don’t report this kind of stuff because I don’t think it is a big deal and I’d be reporting minor stuff all day long.

Please clarify.

Because I’m given a public warning and posts like this are ignored daily.

And I asked about the reporting because if no one reported my post, then it means that other posts are overlooked and mine are given more scrutiny.
 
Someone reported me? For my response? Seriously....

It’s as if my comments in this thread are held to a different set of rules than other posters.

Well considering the comment you typed was to me and I know with 100 percent certainty that I did not hit the report buttom, im going to assume he came in here, saw you arguing for the sake of arguing like you normally do, then saw you were supporting a white supremacist and probably decided that was enough ******* for a day.
 
Are these posts considered as posts meant to antagonize? Methodical Management Methodical Management ?

I don’t report this kind of stuff because I don’t think it is a big deal and I’d be reporting minor stuff all day long.

Please clarify.

Because I’m given a public warning and posts like this are ignored daily.

And I asked about the reporting because if no one reported my post, then it means that other posts are overlooked and mine are given more scrutiny.
:rollin :rollin :rollin

dwalk31 dwalk31 has turned to dry snitching to save face :rollin
 
Someone reported me? For my response? Seriously....

It’s as if my comments in this thread are held to a different set of rules than other posters.
It's as if you don't know that you're acting in bad faith.

A user asked you to account for your support of an administration whose immigration policies are being shaped by a racist - and you responded by focusing on the phrase "self-professed," as if that were the central issue.

You still refuse to explain why you chose to do so - but I think the answer is obvious.


If someone asks you to defend your vote or position, you aren't obligated to answer - but acting in bad faith, as you so routinely have, is destructive and unacceptable.

Ask any member of the group you derisively refer to as the "echo chamber" if they've been held accountable for breaking the rules on our forums. Truth be told, most of the users you squabble with have received more warnings in here than you have - so spare us the "vast left wing conspiracy" angle. You're not the only one being held accountable for bad behavior.

Or do you think you deserve special treatment?
 


This would be a 64D Underwater Origami move by the GOP to have them work in favor of the Dems a little bit because then Trump can say “So you want to keep that same energy?” Brilliant.

Or it could be because they see him as the most beatable :lol Either way, this plays in Trump’s favor. Wow.
 
It's as if you don't know that you're acting in bad faith.

A user asked you to account for your support of an administration whose immigration policies are being shaped by a racist - and you responded by focusing on the phrase "self-professed," as if that were the central issue.

You still refuse to explain why you chose to do so - but I think the answer is obvious.


If someone asks you to defend your vote or position, you aren't obligated to answer - but acting in bad faith, as you so routinely have, is destructive and unacceptable.

Ask any member of the group you derisively refer to as the "echo chamber" if they've been held accountable for breaking the rules on our forums. Truth be told, most of the users you squabble with have received more warnings in here than you have - so spare us the "vast left wing conspiracy" angle. You're not the only one being held accountable for bad behavior.

Or do you think you deserve special treatment?

I can confirm this to be the case :rofl:

Capture1.JPG
Capture2.JPG
 
But what about Norway???

thsy pay like 1% more in taxes and live a hell of a lot better.
 
Yo, petition to get ninjahood back into this thread.

We need some dissenting opinions.

where you at, meff?

If the offense isn’t strong enough to be banned from the board, then it shouldn’t get one banned from the board.

im liberal af and prolly disagree w/ the homey on 99%of **** but it’s either full ban or no ban...

partial ban ain’t it.
 
Russia is not stupid. They see something in this for them. Two reason I could guess why they are doing this...

1. They are setting up another play down the road.

2. Bernie being against Ukraine and Georgia joining NATO makes them happy.

I actually think he would be pretty ineffective due to gridlock and lack of political allies. Globally his “ we are not exploiting foreign countries” policy makes it easier for Putin to exploit them instead (aka real polytik), and they want the US to stop fraking because it lowers the petrodollar and makes us a superior energy exporter than Russia. This is just off the top of my head.

why is he against those countries joining NATO? That legit is fishy to me......
 
Russia is not stupid. They see something in this for them. Two reason I could guess why they are doing this...

1. They are setting up another play down the road.

2. Bernie being against Ukraine and Georgia joining NATO makes them happy.
He also helps drive a wedge in the DNC. They’re probably also hoping the DNC shafts him.
 
Yo, petition to get ninjahood back into this thread.

We need some dissenting opinions.

where you at, meff?

If the offense isn’t strong enough to be banned from the board, then it shouldn’t get one banned from the board.

im liberal af and prolly disagree w/ the homey on 99%of **** but it’s either full ban or no ban...

partial ban ain’t it.

yes

need for boring Mondays and Tuesdays at work
 
Back
Top Bottom