- Mar 27, 2004
- 18,386
- 34,061
From my dvr:
Somebody will upload it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From my dvr:
Somebody will upload it.
You mean the Reggaeton intellegentsia? Tim Duncan doesn’t listen to hip-hop, man
Ima let wavycrocket settle this one, though
The Best Player post Jordan is wilding. Get it together Top5Tiimmy
He was a Republican all along! *everybody pretends to be shocked*I will give it to Bloomberg, he's been masterfully plotting and planting seeds for a minute. Like one of those evil mastermind movies where the twist is revealed at the end.
The usual response to this buffoonery is to point out that an older, dual professional income household being able to buy three houses is not too uncommon whereas owning entire apartment buildings and mansions is not. Another response is that one of those houses is a condo in DC which Bernie needs for his job. Another, very prudent Response is out right mockery and sarcasm to a fundamentally bad faith argument.
I’ll use this tweet and thousands like it to talk about housing and socialism.
About 80% of this country is poor or near poor. Housing is a prime example of this fact. Obviously we have people with no housing. Another group are those with inadequate housing. Either the housing unit is in bad shape, or had to be shared with far more people, or the occupant has to live in a housing unit that is far from their job or is even further from centers of employment and educational opportunities. Then you have people who have a good housing situation but it costs far more than a third of their household budget.
The reason why no socialist cares about Bernie’s houses is because we like housing, we want the mass of people to have more and better housing. This stands in stark contrast to capitalists and their neoliberal intellectual defenders who insist that even basic housing is not a human right and that it’s good that people have to be homeless or spend more than half their income on housing or have seven roommates in a two bedroom apartment.
The universal socialist retort is that the bottom 80% will get more after socialism takes over. Obviously there are times and contexts where we must emphasize the barbarism of capitalism, as an economic order; the barbarism of its patriarchal and white supremacist super structure; and the barbarism of the American state without which our current regime of globalized, financialized, neoliberal model of capitalism would not be able to exist. Ultimately though, socialism has to be about the comfort and the abundance that everyone will enjoy.
For obvious practical and environmental reasons not everyone will live exactly the way a very upper middle class American lives today. But instead an exurban McMansion, your family will have a very well built townhome or three story, 2,500 square foot home in the city or a close in suburb and you’ll know that it’s in a great school district (there won’t be any bad school districts) and it’s no more than a 30 minute commute to your job.
Obviously, jetting out to the Caribbean or Europe for two weeks will be a thing of the past. Instead, everyone be they a janitor or a high ranking official will be able to take weeks and sometimes months long vacation and will use high speed rail and ships to travel either for a few days in another North American city or to visit family abroad for a few weeks or to spend a few months exploring the world, all will enjoy the joys of travel.
Obviously we’ll have sporting associations were everyone of every skill level and age can have fun. Sports that are currently associated with whiteness and wealth will be open to all beer socialism. Outdoor sports, sailing, camping, horse back riding etc and the kissing and equipment available to all.
For the more indoor types, cheap and fast internet will carry better videos games (no more DLC), no more silos of streaming content, no more tiered access to content. And again, everyone will have access to that.
For all but a very capitalism is scarcity and deprivation and more all but a very few, the triumph of socialism will mean a significantly more dignified and secure life, yes, but also a richer and just plain more enjoyable life than what they currently have.
Bread and roses, let’s get them both.
The usual response to this buffoonery is to point out that an older, dual professional income household being able to buy three houses is not too uncommon whereas owning entire apartment buildings and mansions is not. Another response is that one of those houses is a condo in DC which Bernie needs for his job. Another, very prudent Response is out right mockery and sarcasm to a fundamentally bad faith argument.
I’ll use this tweet and thousands like it to talk about housing and socialism.
About 80% of this country is poor or near poor. Housing is a prime example of this fact. Obviously we have people with no housing. Another group are those with inadequate housing. Either the housing unit is in bad shape, or had to be shared with far more people, or the occupant has to live in a housing unit that is far from their job or is even further from centers of employment and educational opportunities. Then you have people who have a good housing situation but it costs far more than a third of their household budget.
The reason why no socialist cares about Bernie’s houses is because we like housing, we want the mass of people to have more and better housing. This stands in stark contrast to capitalists and their neoliberal intellectual defenders who insist that even basic housing is not a human right and that it’s good that people have to be homeless or spend more than half their income on housing or have seven roommates in a two bedroom apartment.
The universal socialist retort is that the bottom 80% will get more after socialism takes over. Obviously there are times and contexts where we must emphasize the barbarism of capitalism, as an economic order; the barbarism of its patriarchal and white supremacist super structure; and the barbarism of the American state without which our current regime of globalized, financialized, neoliberal model of capitalism would not be able to exist. Ultimately though, socialism has to be about the comfort and the abundance that everyone will enjoy.
For obvious practical and environmental reasons not everyone will live exactly the way a very upper middle class American lives today. But instead an exurban McMansion, your family will have a very well built townhome or three story, 2,500 square foot home in the city or a close in suburb and you’ll know that it’s in a great school district (there won’t be any bad school districts) and it’s no more than a 30 minute commute to your job.
Obviously, jetting out to the Caribbean or Europe for two weeks will be a thing of the past. Instead, everyone be they a janitor or a high ranking official will be able to take weeks and sometimes months long vacation and will use high speed rail and ships to travel either for a few days in another North American city or to visit family abroad for a few weeks or to spend a few months exploring the world, all will enjoy the joys of travel.
Obviously we’ll have sporting associations were everyone of every skill level and age can have fun. Sports that are currently associated with whiteness and wealth will be open to all beer socialism. Outdoor sports, sailing, camping, horse back riding etc and the kissing and equipment available to all.
For the more indoor types, cheap and fast internet will carry better videos games (no more DLC), no more silos of streaming content, no more tiered access to content. And again, everyone will have access to that.
For all but a very capitalism is scarcity and deprivation and more all but a very few, the triumph of socialism will mean a significantly more dignified and secure life, yes, but also a richer and just plain more enjoyable life than what they currently have.
Bread and roses, let’s get them both.
these dudes acting like bernie owning a lake front property in the middle of nowhere Vermont makes him un-relatable to working class people. This **** is valued at only $600k. ****, this lake house is still more affordable than 2bd/1ba properties in some of the grimeyest hoods of East Oakland. Laughable that Bloomberg tried to separate Sanders from the common folk and portray him as “Bourgeoise Bernie.” Meanwhile he’s spending $7 million a day of his own money to finance his campaign.
Bloom must've dangled a well buttered Roti in front of TimmyFrom my dvr:
Somebody will upload it.
I really don't give a **** about Bernie's houses but it is funny as hell watching his supporters flip out and people are pointing out that the so proclaimed people's champ is also another rich white guy.
I remember when Beto being well off was an issue for them . Something, something, something his father-in-law
Omg two 70 year olds can afford a 600k house together???
what are they billionaires or something?
these dudes acting like bernie owning a lake front property in the middle of nowhere Vermont makes him un-relatable to working class people. This **** is valued at only $600k. ****, this lake house is still more affordable than 2bd/1ba properties in some of the grimeyest hoods of East Oakland. Laughable that Bloomberg tried to separate Sanders from the common folk and portray him as “Bourgeoise Bernie.” Meanwhile he’s spending $7 million a day of his own money to finance his campaign.