- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
dwalk31
just acting like a *** right now because he knows that the GOP is scamming and it got people upset, so he wants to poke them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude’s been dying for the acquittal so that he can troll NT.dwalk31 just acting like a *** right now because he knows that the GOP is scamming and it got people upset, so he wants to poke them.
"fAkE nEwS¿"dwalk31 just acting like a *** right now because he knows that the GOP is scamming and it got people upset, so he wants to poke them.
How’s the volume been at your company? I’m not in our manufacturing department anymore, but I hear our volume is low and we’re trying to outsource assembly to China lol.im just gonna keep tallying up the "we acknowledge the presidents wrong doing, but wont do anything about" count. no amount of blaming the dems for which hunts and flawed cases will change the fact that the GOP has refused to act even after acknowledging the presidents repeated wrong doing. selfishly, im low key glad that this will push conservatives out in the wild to shut about defending the president and the GOP. I work in manufacturing with a heavily blue collar low information conservative work force, even they have been talking less and less about how great the president is for the country
Besides his antagonistic behavior, that is the clearest sign he is a worthless troll.Dude’s been dying for the acquittal so that he can troll NT.
How’s the volume been at your company? I’m not in our manufacturing department anymore, but I hear our volume is low and we’re trying to outsource assembly to China lol.
i've always suspected him less of a clam lover and more of a geoduck enthusiast.Just ask him why he supports Roy Moore and he clams up.
The other dimension of that position is the claim that the point of impeachment proceedings is to come to a decision based on “what’s best for the country” (however the hell any individual in any given set of circumstances might choose to interpret that) and not on whether the available evidence of a president’s actions does or does not warrant their removal from office.This is absurd logic from Rubio and I don’t even think he understand what he is saying.
He’s acknowledging that his actions meet the standard of impeachment which means he’s agrees he did obstruct congress and abuse power. BUT that doesn’t mean it’s “in the best interest of the country” to remove him?
when is it not in the best interest of a country to remove a president that obstructs congress one of the institutions meant to keep the balance of government and abuse the power the office gave a him? Should that not always be in our interest to remove leaders who obstruct and abuse power? does he not understand the potential ramifications of his argument? Or does he just not care
Dude’s been dying for the acquittal so that he can troll NT.
So the Dems should have ignored Trump's clear criminal actions and corrupt behavior because doing their constitutional duty would inevitably lead to the feeding the trolls?“Seal political fate” is the biggest bunch of bull**** these commentators kick.
how often was that term used during Kavanaugh? War time resolutions? Hell, I’m sure it was used during Benghazi.
unfortunately, that’s how half the country is.
and unfortunately, the Dems gave the trolls a wide open dunk with this dumb *** impeachment...
because acquittal is inevitable, and the victory lap will be loud and full of bravado
These Republicans have suddenly found nuance!The other dimension of that position is the claim that the point of impeachment proceedings is to come to a decision based on “what’s best for the country” (however the hell any individual in any given set of circumstances might choose to interpret that) and not on whether the available evidence of a president’s actions does or does not warrant their removal from office.
I’m no Constitutional expert, so maybe the Constitution says something like “Regardless of whether grounds for removal from office exist, you can and should ignore them if you feel like doing so is in the best interest of the country, whatever you determine that to be based on whatever criteria you personally deem to be relevant.” Maybe that’s in there—but I have my doubts. And if it’s not, Rubio is literally publicly proclaiming that he’s acting in clear violation of his oath of office.
Because manufacturing has been contracting.I work in manufacturing with a heavily blue collar low information conservative work force, even they have been talking less and less about how great the president is for the country
This is simply Rubio putting himself and his fellow Republicans (and the base) above the Constitution. This is a clear signal that we are entering another authoritarian era in this country's history.This is absurd logic from Rubio and I don’t even think he understand what he is saying.
He’s acknowledging that his actions meet the standard of impeachment which means he’s agrees he did obstruct congress and abuse power. BUT that doesn’t mean it’s “in the best interest of the country” to remove him?
when is it not in the best interest of a country to remove a president that obstructs congress one of the institutions meant to keep the balance of government and abuse the power the office gave a him? Should that not always be in our interest to remove leaders who obstruct and abuse power? does he not understand the potential ramifications of his argument? Or does he just not care
Try and make sense of this excuse