kdawg
Staff member
- Jun 25, 2003
- 11,209
- 12,877
Patrick Philbin has an incredible gift for talking at length without actually saying anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And? Republicans would acquit him of shooting someone on 5th avenue.I think he’s about to be acquitted on the abuse of power article. Irrespective of the GAO report.
It doesn’t matter if you don’t believe it to be illegal.
The Government accountability Office A non partisan office said withholding the aid was breaking the law. Last I checked breaking the law is an illegal act.
G.A.O. Report Says Trump Administration Broke Law in Withholding Ukraine Aid (Published 2020)
As the Senate prepared for the impeachment trial, the Government Accountability Office said the White House violated a law that limits a president’s power to withhold money allocated by Congress.www.google.com
you can believe What you want but that doesnt makes you right
And? Republicans would acquit him of shooting someone on 5th avenue.
You would swear Trump was once again accused of preying on an underaged girl the way DWalk is defending his actions.
Oh another unrated thing about Bernie is that he uses the power of negative partisanship.
By putting so much blame on the Democratic Party (some fair, some unfair) for the current state of affairs, he is appealing to left leaning voters with grievances with the party (both for their economics and stances on social issues). So a vote for Bernie is a vote against the party establishment.
Ignoring the fact that Bernie's near three decade Congressional career has been made possible by said Establishment.
It is a beautiful politicial play if you think of it.
And it’s a problem this senate might Acquit a clear abuse of power and what was found to be an illegal act. And Based on what is this vote to be more bipartisan?You’re right. What the majority of US Senators think matters. And they are likely about to acquit him on both articles of impeachment. And the vote will likely be more bipartisan than the house vote
Now we’re back to “there was no quid pro quo”.
And Based on what is this vote to be more bipartisan?
Shouldn't what matters be the evidence and the facts of the case?You’re right. What the majority of US Senators think matters. And they are likely about to acquit him on both articles of impeachment. And the vote will likely be more bipartisan than the house vote
Shouldn't what matters be the evidence and the facts of the case?