- 150,773
- 201,758
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't believe that ****. Dude probably did the same thing I do when I gotta read a book for this stupid book club my girl signed me up for.24 of them were the art of the deal.
Judges get impeached too.All *drumroll* two presidential impeachment trials?
Judges get impeached too.
I had to go through 50+ journal articles to write my thesis, and I wouldn’t claim to be knowledgeable about the topic.Even if it is true, this is a good example that shows you can read a whole 25 books on a subject and still be a clueless moron.
Holy ****. When is Kanye covering this for Donald's reelection inauguration party?I've got QUID
I've got PRO QUOS, in different area codes (area, area codes, codes)
Quid, PRO, Quos, in different area codes (area, area codes, codes)
Now you thought I was just 7-7-0
And 4-0-4, I'm worldwide Libs, act like y'all don't know
It's the abominable Pro Quo man
Globe-trot international post man
Neighbor-Quid man
7-1-8s, 2-0-2's
I send small cities and states I-O-U's
9-0-1, matter fact 3-0-5
I'll jump off the G4, we can meet outside
So control your Chris Quomoes and keep your drawers on
'Til I close the door and I'm jumping your QUOS
3-1-2, 3-1-3, 2-1-5, 8-0-3
Read your horoscope and eat some QUO d'oeuvres
Ten on pump one these Quids is self serve
7-5-7, 4-1-0, my cell phone says overload
Removal flows from impeachment.
The Senators are the judges. They DO make the decision on what is ultimately a removable offense as they can acquit the president of the charges lodged against him in the house and determine that he did not commit anything that warrants removal from Office.
Since the senators are the judges they can decide to agree with the President’s lawyers and determine that what is alleged is not an impeachable offense as a matter of law. And thus, it does not warrant removal.
Having witnesses would concede that the alleged activities are impeachable, if proven. And then it gets to a back-n-forth factual argument. But summarily deciding on the law is an option since they are ultimately the judges.
The idea of calling witnesses when everyone agrees he won’t be removed is nonsensical.
Try this hypo:
The judge in your case has decided that you are innocent because what’s alleged is not a crime. Your lawyer makes an argument that even if what the DA charged you with is true, it does not meet the elements of the crime. The judge agrees (majority of the senate). Your attorney makes a motion of summary judgment on the law. Does the judge:
a. Hear witnesses to determine the facts; or
b. Make a determination assuming that all of the allegations are true?
The former, I submit, is a waste of time. Because it ends in the same place. Unless they make different charges—as long as the majority agree that the charged behavior doesn’t warrant removal, witnesses won’t matter.
He doesn't. That particular argument sounds like a direct translation of what a supporter of a dictator would say.Do you every choke on all that bull**** you continuously spew.
Hunter Biden was getting paid paid on the board of Burisma. Will be interesting to see how this plays during the Democratic primary.
Hunter Biden was getting paid paid on the board of Burisma. Will be interesting to see how this plays during the Democratic primary.
Hunter Biden was getting paid paid on the board of Burisma. Will be interesting to see how this plays during the Democratic primary.
This can't possibly be a serious question.What is everyones issue with the Israeli proposal?