- Nov 3, 2012
- 16,413
- 8,760
He'd probably talk **** about Bin Laden for a few months and have a summit a year after
One of the big differences
Trump would go straight to dirty talk
Of course here, Bush’s actions spoke louder than his words
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He'd probably talk **** about Bin Laden for a few months and have a summit a year after
Well almost immediately after the attacks he bragged about now having the tallest building in downtown ManhattanHow do y'all think our Dapper President would handle the 9/11 attacks under his watch?
How do y'all think our Dapper President would handle the 9/11 attacks under his watch?
"Look, I respect the way Bin Laden looks out for his people ok. Where was Wild William and Crooked Hilary for the American people the past 8 years? ok, we're putting together a tremendous tremendous deal with Al-Qaeda to get rid of terrorism forever, no kidding. Nobody could make this deal except me, believe me. Could you imagine if Gore successfully rigged the election? There'd be mooslims and mosque on every corner in our country, we can't have that, can't do it "
Further complicating the situation is that state tax officials, who are examining potential tax fraud by the Trump Organization, have sought to include local prosecutors from the Manhattan district attorney's office in any meeting with Cohen and his attorney, the sources said. A spokesman for the New York tax department declined to comment.
Federal prosecutors generally seek to complete their inquiries without the interference of other overlapping probes that could cause hiccups in their case. While Cohen has already pleaded guilty in the federal case, he has yet to be sentenced and could still seek to cooperate with the US attorney's office. In addition, federal prosecutors are continuing to pursue a line of inquiry stemming from their Cohen investigation, according to a person familiar with the matter: whether Trump Organization executives violated campaign finance laws.
The federal probe regarding the Trump company was first reported by Bloomberg News. A spokeswoman for the company didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
In the days following the federal charges, US attorney officials relayed their preferences to the Manhattan district attorney's office and to the state attorney general's office, which has its own related inquiries and has been coordinating closely with the US attorney's office, these people said. The attorney general's office then conveyed the federal prosecutors' message to the tax department and to the office of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, according to the law-enforcement official involved with the matter.
The governor's office said it was never contacted on the subject. "No one has told us that the southern district of New York advised the tax department not to proceed with their investigation," said Alphonso David, counsel to the governor.
Nevertheless, the tax department on Tuesday is set to meet with Cohen's attorney, Guy Petrillo, the sources said. It is unclear if Cohen himself is also scheduled to attend or if the prosecutors from the Manhattan district attorney's office plan to join.
Tax department inquiries are designed to be independent of the governor's office, which isn't supposed to have any involvement in or knowledge of their proceedings.
Petrillo didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for the Manhattan district attorney's office declined to comment.
In August, hours after Cohen pleaded guilty to the federal charges, the tax department subpoenaed him as part of an inquiry into the Donald J. Trump Foundation and whether the charity violated tax laws, CNN has reported.
The tax department now also appears to be examining the Trump Organization based on information included in the federal charges against Cohen, one of the people familiar with the matter said.
Court filings from federal prosecutors showed that Cohen submitted false invoices to the Trump Organization in an effort to get reimbursed for hush money he paid to women who had alleged affairs with Trump, which the White House has denied. According to the filings, the company then paid out those invoices as legitimate business expenses. That could be considered tax fraud, this person said.
The tax department is also examining whether the Trump Organization failed to keep accurate books and records, which is a crime under state law, this person said.
The tax department can't bring any criminal charges on its own, and if it finds any wrongdoing, the department would have to refer the matter to the state attorney general or another prosecutor's office.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.Speaking of deficits I saw this article earlier this afternoon
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/406040-federal-deficit-soars-32-percent-to-895b
Federal deficit soars 32 percent to $895B
The federal deficit hit $895 billion in the first 11 months of fiscal 2018, an increase of $222 billion, or 32 percent, over the same period the previous year, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
The nonpartisan CBO reported that the central drivers of the increasing deficit were the Republican tax law and the bipartisan agreement to increase spending. As a result, revenue only rose 1 percent, failing to keep up with a 7 percent surge in spending, it added.
Revenue from individual and payroll taxes was up some $105 billion, or 4 percent, while corporate taxes fell $71 billion, or 30 percent.
The August statistics were somewhat inflated, however, due to a timing shift for certain payments, putting the deficit measure through August slightly out of sync with the previous year, the CBO noted. Had it not been for the timing shift, the deficit would have increased $154 billion instead of $222 billion.
Earlier analysis from CBO projected that deficits would near $1 trillion in 2019 and surpass that amount the following year.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
This can't be right. I remember a gust of wind blowing in news that "da tax coffers"
we're going to be booming. And not only would that tax cut pay for itself, it would be revenue generating.
Dis deficit filled economic pudding is missing da proof.
........
Jesus christ i get the whole “attack democracy” but seriously?
Da proof is in da pudding, b