***Official Political Discussion Thread***



And the fact he's downplaying the concentration camps (it's weird associating that in 2018) and pretty much EVERYTHING wrong about his administration is why I hate this year politically.

I have this gut feeling that something anti-climactic will happen to Mueller and I hope I'm wrong.
 


tenor.gif


Also

 
“The government further respectfully requests leave of the Court to file additional exhibits if necessary," reads the end of Mueller's latest court submission.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...t-of-more-than-500-pieces-of-evidence-against
Mueller releases list of more than 500 pieces of evidence against Manafort
special counsel office on Wednesday released an itemized list of evidence prosecutors are considering for use against Paul Manafort as the former Trump aide's Washington D.C. trial approaches.

The list, first reported by Politico, contains about 500 items ranging from immunity agreements to texts between Manafort, Ukraine's former president and a fellow U.S. political consultant.
Other items on the list include photographs and documents of expensive purchases prosecutors say Manafort made with money he attempted to hide from U.S. authorities after working for pro-Russian political parties in Ukraine.

Manafort is charged with a number of financial crimes including bank fraud and money laundering.

Mueller's attorneys also did not rule out the possibility of introducing further evidence against the former Trump campaign chairman, who pleaded not guilty last year and has maintained his innocence.

“The government further respectfully requests leave of the Court to file additional exhibits if necessary," reads the end of Mueller's latest court submission.

Manafort was ordered to jail last month for violating the terms of his bail agreement.

None of Manafort's charges relate to accusations of contacts with Russia during the 2016 election, but Manafort remains in jail awaiting his Virginia trial later this month. A separate trial in Washington D.C. is slated for September.

The latest indictment from Mueller's team last week named 12 Russian military officers in the scheme to spread stolen information hacked from the servers of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) during the campaign.

Manafort has maintained that he was not involved in any election interference, and none of the charges he faces yet relate to collusion with Russia's government.
 
Last edited:
Maaannn, these Repubs are pure Trash can humans... wow... so much wickedness they are displaying... hopefully history will hold them ALL accountable...
Mother Russia must have dirt on all these clowns or they know another hacked election is their only hope.




They are 100% compromised and complicit. Problem is....news media and politicians who’ve known these guys for decades and are pseudo friends with them won’t call them out on it for real for real. They still playing “nice” with these folks and giving them the benefit of the doubt when at every turn....they’ve displayed pure abandonment of any principles and obstructed and lied continuously.
 
man its hilarious watching Trump supporters squirm and contort themselves. theyre so conflicted by their hate for everything they perceive as liberal and the more and more indefensible hypocrisy. by mid terms theyll be so boxed in they wont be able to compliment trump without complimenting Obama
 
Michael Anton was a national security official in The Bigot™ administration, so of course he would have that opinion. But the real question is why would The Washington Post give him an outlet?
 



They are 100% compromised and complicit. Problem is....news media and politicians who’ve known these guys for decades and are pseudo friends with them won’t call them out on it for real for real. They still playing “nice” with these folks and giving them the benefit of the doubt when at every turn....they’ve displayed pure abandonment of any principles and obstructed and lied continuously.

This reminds me of something else Schiff mentioned recently, I think it was last Friday but I'm not sure.
Schiff told someone I can't recall on MSNBC that the Democrats on the House Intel committee wanted to interview a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, whose name is John Mashburn.
House Intel Democrats wanted to question Mashburn about whether or not Papadopoulos communicated with other Trump campaign officials about the information he received about Russians being in possession of those emails.
Schiff said Mashburn had agreed to a voluntary appearance, however when he informed the Republican majority they contacted Mashburn and told him not to come. Schiff didn't specify who made the contact to tell Mashburn to stay away but presumably it would be Nunes.
 
Michael Anton was a national security official in The Bigot™ administration, so of course he would have that opinion. But the real question is why would The Washington Post give him an outlet?

Because of a bizarre commitment to civility and false balance. Because of a misdiagnosis of the refined techniques of a racist.

The WAPO editorial board insists on civility no doubt because norms and institutions are under siege. A somewhat understandable position except that my sense is they also fear the rabble; being subjected to shaming by the left.

Much like the disingenuous proponents of free speech, WAPO believes that all viewpoints are important, even nativist positions. The only thing that is beyond the pale is that which appears overtly authoritarian and deviates from color-blind discourse. It's the same reason why the NYT and other liberal outlets will seek to 'understand' the Nazi or why they're so intrigued by the refined white nationalists who wear suits.
 
Obstructing investigations, playing right into Russia's hands, working with the WH to conjure up a false Obama wiretap story, using PAC donations on leisure activities for himself, being a Californian Celtics fan, ...
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article215099780.html
Nunes used political dollars for $15K in Celtics tickets, winery tours and Vegas trips
Rep. Devin Nunes used political donations to pay for nearly $15,000 in tickets to Boston Celtics basketball games as well as winery tours and lavish trips to Las Vegas, according to reports from the Federal Election Commission and two nonpartisan watchdog groups.
Nunes, R-Calif., has reportedly been a Celtics fan since high school, though he grew up in Tulare, California. He used the money from his political action committee last year on three occasions to buy tickets.

His PAC also spent about $42,741 since 2013 on catering, site rentals, hotels and meals in Las Vegas. The most recent instance was March 9, when the PAC spent $7,229 at seven different restaurants and hotels in Las Vegas.

On June 19, the PAC’s expenditures included nearly $5,000 spent at six wineries in Paso Robles and Santa Margarita, both outside his district in California, and about $5,000 to Gold Coast Limousine the same day.

Also listed was a hotel charge for $4,409 at Sea Venture, a hotel about 20 miles from Santa Margarita and located right on the beach.

All Boston, Vegas and winery charges were listed as fundraising expenses.

Nunes responded, “I wish I could help you,” when McClatchy approached him Wednesday with questions about his PAC spending. His office would not respond to requests for comment.

Leadership PACs such as the one Nunes runs are supposed to be used to allow members of Congress to donate money to other political campaigns, but using them for other expenses in connection with fundraising is common among members of Congress.

Nunes’ fame has grown enormously due to his position as House Intelligence Committee chairman, his friendly relationship with President Donald Trump and his controversial views about Department of Justice investigations.

Many Democrats and some Republicans see his efforts as attempts to discredit the investigation of Special Counsel Robert Mueller into the Trump campaign’s involvement with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

As he became better known, Nunes’ fundraising ability has grown.

Nunes has raised more than $7 million for his own 2018 re-election, compared to past years when he typically collected between $1 million and $2.5 million. The PAC, called New PAC, has also seen its fundraising climb year after year, and is currently on track to raise and spend more money over the 2017-18 cycle than it did in years past.

A report by the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center and Issue One, released Thursday, spotlighted the various ways members of Congress use leadership PACs to “subsidize lavish lifestyles on their donors’ dimes.”

Brendan Fischer and Maggie Christ, the report’s authors, estimated that on average over the past three election cycles 45 percent of money given to leadership PACs actually went to other candidates or political committees.

Nunes has a slightly better rate than average, with 52 percent of New PAC’s spending going toward campaign contributions.

“They’ll say these are fundraising events, or say it coincided with a fundraiser, where they raised more money with donors,” Fischer said. “But at what point are they effectively raising money just to fund their next fundraiser?”

The House Ethics Committee bans the use of leadership PACs for personal use, though it’s rarely enforced. The Federal Elections Commission has not issued clear directives on whether the funds can be used for personal matters.

Nunes’ PAC spent $7,300 on tickets at TD Garden, home of the Celtics, on Feb. 9, 2017, $5,700 on tickets on April 11, 2017 and $1,588 on tickets on May 8, 2017.

The Celtics had home games within a few days of those purchases. The May date was during playoffs against the Washington Wizards. The PAC also spent $3,594 for a four-star hotel in Boston, the Omni Parker House, on May 8, 2017.

Nunes raises little money from Massachusetts. His campaign fund has received about half of one percent of funding this cycle from Massachusetts and New PAC received one $5,000 donation from the state in this election cycle, from the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance PAC.

New PAC has raised about $565,400 so far in this 18-month old election cycle. It raised $731,000 the previous two-year cycle and $603,000 the cycle before that.

“Set aside that Nunes has got to be one of about 15 people in his district that spends the NBA season rooting for the guys from Teddy Kennedy’s turf instead of local favorites; the fact is, the FEC is not going to look favorably on a dude who uses his tax-exempt political entity like a personal slush fund, flying himself to Boston to watch them while apparently engaging in no activity relevant to the purpose of the political organization,” said Liz Mair, a Republican political strategist who heads the anti-Trump group Swamp Accountability Project. The group has been funding ads targeting Nunes.

While trips to Las Vegas were common enough among members of Congress to have its own category in the CLC and Issue One report, Nunes was listed as having spent the most there since 2013.
 
Back
Top Bottom