I don't think you get it, this isn't about disagreeing on opinions. This seems to be more about you creating a whirlwind of misrepresentations and then getting angry at them lol things that don't exist, you basically put all those words in his mouth and then got mad that he said them. You don't have to be upset with me, those are just my opinions
I made assessments about him, based on his words.
You just seem to ignore the evidence that is right in front of you. I know you have not taken a second to read the Current Affairs and NYT pieces.
I even post links using his words. Peterson and his clans of lobsters just like to claim he was taken out of context when people tear apart his nonsense.
He was wrong about C-16, he is a hypocrite about the open exchange of ideas, he is wrong about there being no white privilege, he is wrong about women and especially racial minorities facing a unique level of oppression, he is wrong about what leftist want, he doesn't even seem to comprehend the ideologies he rants against.
Your problem with my post is not that I am misrepresenting his post, because I cite him directly too; so does Current Affairs, so does NYT. Your problem is that I am not a fan of his shtick and much of his points.
Also, I must point out the irony of you claiming I am misrepresenting his words. When a) you claimed he makes good points on current events and the one example you cited, transgender right, he either misunderstood or misrepresented C-16. And b) you yourself seem to be misrepresenting or straight up don't understand the mainstream transgender civil rights advocacy.
In your mind, the only way that could be the case is if I am closed minded. That all the times I directly address his ideas, I am just misrepresenting him; because no way he can be that bad.
Dude please, spare me, and miss me with that. Peterson is trash. I have stated my case why I believe as such.
You wanna fall for that white hotepery, go right ahead.
Be Best