- Jul 30, 2017
- 9,771
- 15,928
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- Sep 24, 2015
- 7,619
- 13,102
You really think she's smart enough to figure that out? I'd say go ahead and let's see what her boss was into with Epstein.
- Nov 16, 2022
- 1,109
- 1,460
Absolutely not lolYou really think she's smart enough to figure that out? I'd say go ahead and let's see what her boss was into with Epstein.
I’m queuing the popcorn and waiting for the Trump backlash
- Dec 8, 1999
- 7,404
- 29,344
HOW? How was she supposed to distance herself from it?
What do you want her to say? Apologize for thinking that transgender people deserve healthcare?
And this will magically stop the lies about litterboxes and schools performing gender reassignment surgeries without parental consent?
Let’s do something in your comfort zone and look at a post from your Twitter feed:
How is the transgender question framed? “Kamala Harris is MORE FOCUSED ON CULTURAL ISSUES LIKE TRANSGENDER ISSUES RATHER THAN HELPING THE MIDDLE CLASS.”
This is the point: you don’t need to make a ritual sacrifice of scapegoats if you’re actually delivering for the masses.
Income inequality is growing. People feel worse off. Some hold even tighter to demographic social status when their pride as “providers” feels threatened.
You don’t need to read minds to believe that people often want to act in their own self-interest, but you probably do need to read minds to claim with any confidence that Harris would’ve won the election if only she’d “distanced herself” further from “transgender issues,” without even specifying what that means.
Republicans run on selfishness and division. It’s a reach to assume that every disaffected Democrat is more concerned by “cultural issues” involving others than kitchen table issues involving themselves.
Your bias regarding transgender people has been made explicit. You’re just looking for “evidence” to prop it up.
The rest of your post is an emotional spiral of ad hominem nonsense and “edgy” 4chan-speak that disqualifies itself.
You’re doing me a favor by irradiating your own position with this Ben Shapiro charm offensive.
Yesterday sucked because I had to be in an MRI machine for like an hour and a half and I swear @WASHED KING orelpablo21 paid off the tech to mess with me, because I asked to listen to hip hop, and the playlist consisted of like Shaboozey's entire catalog, Ice Spice, and GloRilla.
I am not even lying when I tell you they played "Not Like US" like 5 times.
I was strapped to the table pleading for a break at min 75 like....
But reading the recent posts in here have made me feel better...
Loving the energy in here brahs, we gotta get it out before we refocus
Get well soon!
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,992
- 36,397
Dr Oz to oversee Medicaid and Medicare 
- Feb 1, 2019
- 2,699
- 5,519
Or they could go ACTUAL left wing and push a real Democratic Socialist agenda: Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, and a super-simplified tax code that taxes the rich even heavier.
Quit playing nice and push drastic reform that would actually benefit the vast majority of the population. If the other side is going to call you a communist and a socialist and a radical for supporting basic civil rights for disadvantaged groups or a livable minimum wage, why not go all in? (Because all or most of them are not true progressives, they're just not complete fascists.)
- Oct 14, 2008
- 13,926
- 13,362
Dr Oz to oversee Medicaid and Medicare
Isn’t he a chiropractor? He isn’t even a real doctor.
No he's a real doctor. He's a surgeon and he was actually a very good one IIRC before he went on his grifter journey.
- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,182
- 29,507
cmon dawg your seeing ghosts, everyone who disagrees with you is a bigot, 4chan, or incel. pleaseyou are a never ending supply of fake edgy leftist BS insults and adhominems , and you have the nerve to act like you are above it all.
YOU ARE NO DIFFERENT than any 4chan troll, you've just chose Tumblr over 4chan. get a grip. if your gonna insult and troll, do that and spare me the sanctimony when I push back.
You still can't accurately restate any claim, I didn't say ritually sacrifice anyone. these questions you're asking ive answered them.
Distance yourself by taking clear positions on salient political topics that separate you from the left.
never said she lost because of only transgender, issues, never said to ritual sacrifice anything. go argue with the voice in your ahead. i don't have time to rebut fake arguments.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,257
- 202,695
- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,182
- 29,507
The one good thing about Niketalk being so old is you can find me making plenty of pro trans arguments overs the years.
but let meth tell it, I'VE EXPOSED MY BIAS?
Please tell me where is the bias;
here's me
telling conservatives they need to "get over it" when it comes to trans girls in womens locker rooms.
and me arguing for an updated concept of gender and explaining why trans women should be allowed to use the correct locker room
here's me explaining that being attracted or having sex with trans women doesn't make you gay
here is me arguing for transgender inclusion in sports
i basically sound like
rexanglorum
but let meth tell it, I'VE EXPOSED MY BIAS?
Please tell me where is the bias;
here's me
telling conservatives they need to "get over it" when it comes to trans girls in womens locker rooms.
and me arguing for an updated concept of gender and explaining why trans women should be allowed to use the correct locker room
here's me explaining that being attracted or having sex with trans women doesn't make you gay
here is me arguing for transgender inclusion in sports
i basically sound like
rexanglorum
Dawg there are more gay people than transgendered people, by that logic, if you got gay kids in the school should they not be allowed to use the same locker for fear they might be having sex? there are a tiny amount of trans people I don't think you to worry about them having sex with the girls in the locker room.
not one's getting rid of gendered bathroom, the only difference is our understanding of what constitutes gender has changed.
I read this book.
Essentially:
Men both gay and straight have built in universal visual cues for sexually arousal. Which one of these cues you find most interesting is random, any other weirder cues were likely acquired from a childhood experience.
-butt
-breasts or chest for gay men
-feet
-waist (i think, can't remember)
-penis
now your probably wondering i thought only gay men liked penis. well according to their research it applies to straight men as well.
The reason you see so much "monster d" aimed at straight male audience, the reason that men traditionally have always been interested with penis size far more than women is that men have a innate visual interest in the penis. (not men just the penis itself).
The evolution theory behind it goes...
there have been African tribes where all the men where a decorated penis sheath that makes there pnis like 15 inches long. un contacted tribes in papa new Guinea the men remarked upon first seeing white people, they thought they had a massive penis that wrapped around their waist.
in all culture males always have a much greater intrest in the penis then women.
Evolutionary the human penis is unnecessarily huge meaning, it must serve some purpose in terms of sexual selection, so it might be like a lions mane. Other males may have looked to the penis to judge another males level of strength and decide whether they should attempt to challenge them for females. So having a large penis become something to desire maybe somehow that got mixed into sexual cues.
so why shemales?
Shemales essentially are a combination of all the basic visual cues. It's like an emoticon, it captures all the visually interesting parts of sex in one person.
Are the people who like ******s gay?
Probably, not, almost certainly not. Based on their research, gay dudes don't like ******** tend to be grossed out by them.
Cartoon trans porn tells you want ****** people really want. they want some one who looks exactly like a women, with no hint of masculinity besides...penis.lol)
Interesting book, the info was gathered from search engine queries. for example: a user who searches for gay porn, never searches for trans porn. a use who searches for trany porn will also search for regular women but never gay.
- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,182
- 29,507
but remember!
because I think non-binary isn't a very coherent concept, im a bigot.
you be the judge;
but i could wrong, maybe the kids are always right!
because I think non-binary isn't a very coherent concept, im a bigot.
you be the judge;
but i could wrong, maybe the kids are always right!
- Dec 8, 1999
- 7,404
- 29,344
Ah, so we’ve reached the portion of the discussion where, after pages and pages of smug provocation, you finally got more pushback than you bargained for, dropped any pretense of civil discussion, and entered full meltdown mode. It’s hardly the first time.
you are a never ending supply of fake edgy leftist BS insults and adhominems , and you have the nerve to act like you are above it all.
YOU ARE NO DIFFERENT than any 4chan troll, you've just chose Tumblr over 4chan. get a grip. if your gonna insult and troll, do that and spare me the sanctimony when I push back.
You still can't accurately restate any claim, I didn't say ritually sacrifice anyone. these questions you're asking ive answered them.
Distance yourself by taking clear positions on salient political topics that separate you from the left.
never said she lost because of only transgender, issues, never said to ritual sacrifice anything. go argue with the voice in your ahead. i don't have time to rebut fake arguments.
You goad people on issues of personal importance from a distant perch, instigate endlessly, and have the nerve to call them “trolls” when they dare respond. You can’t take even a fraction of what you try to dish out.
Tone can sometimes be difficult for people to recognize on the Internet, and perhaps you don’t mean to come across this way - but the reaction you’re seeing in this thread is not an anomaly. If this isn’t the effect you want, maybe everyone else isn’t the problem.
You’re clearly unable to read the room, so I will: I’m not going to crowd out genuine, respectful discussion by further reacting to juvenile insults.
Good night.
- Oct 14, 2008
- 13,926
- 13,362
Thanks for clarifying.
- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,182
- 29,507
- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,182
- 29,507
so basically the left will keep losing working class support unless they deliver universal healthcare, universal basic income, and even higher taxes on the rich?
yeeeah im pretty skeptical this will work.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,492
- 196,034
What the hell is happening in here
- Mar 25, 2021
- 9,663
- 20,796
Osh failed to distance himself from another argument
- May 25, 2004
- 30,355
- 40,934
I don’t think the current left can do anything.
They need new faces and a dumpster fire and people will come running back. That’s the way it works here.
I don’t think it’s really that deep, people are feeling squeezed so they went the other direction of the person in charge.
They need new faces and a dumpster fire and people will come running back. That’s the way it works here.
I don’t think it’s really that deep, people are feeling squeezed so they went the other direction of the person in charge.
- Mar 25, 2021
- 9,663
- 20,796
Democrats aren't alone — incumbent parties have lost elections all around the world
Democrats were just one of the many incumbent parties around the globe that lost ground in 2024 elections.
Worldwide phenomenon
- May 25, 2004
- 30,355
- 40,934
exactly, it's happening everywhere and it always happens here.
maybe not always beating incumbents but it swings both ways, I'm 37 and seen three democrat presidents. that's not anything it's a conservative country and probably always will be.
maybe not always beating incumbents but it swings both ways, I'm 37 and seen three democrat presidents. that's not anything it's a conservative country and probably always will be.
