- Feb 2, 2014
- 39,135
- 55,284
Weird how one side doesn’t like to read
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
kdawg
Staff member
- Jun 25, 2003
- 11,208
- 12,876
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
Participating in discussion.
All I did was ask if the AB law is what he was referencing and,” you reply but don’t answer the question you get your legs for lips on instead.
You typed all that **** and then mention that you thought we were only supposed to take Trump at his words like I mentioned anything about what the man said or what came out of his mouth. You guys are wild. You should have waited for another one my posts to attack if you wanted to really engage, that one was not it.
All I did was ask if the AB law is what he was referencing and,” you reply but don’t answer the question you get your legs for lips on instead.
You typed all that **** and then mention that you thought we were only supposed to take Trump at his words like I mentioned anything about what the man said or what came out of his mouth. You guys are wild. You should have waited for another one my posts to attack if you wanted to really engage, that one was not it.
Last edited:
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
That attack was pretty messy. Just be patient, you’ll have more content from me soon, hanging out here for a little bit it’s easy to see what the vibe is, discussion? Come on buddy, yall are not about “discussion”
- Mar 25, 2021
- 9,644
- 20,768
We got a real free thinker in the building
- Sep 28, 2020
- 1,395
- 2,979
His entire initial post is attempting to sane-wash a direct quote and then claims less than a day later that he didn’t mention anything that came “out of his mouth”.
To quote @RustyShackleford… struggle troll.
Still desperately trying to make “you typed all this” land, too. Can we agree that he isn’t worth engaging?
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
It wasn’t a direct quote from Trump that is for sure. Did you watch the video?
It was the result of the google of I think California law. It’s literally what is highlighted in blue on the google result
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
Again, you should have picked a better post of mine to attack or gang up on. This one was not it
- Sep 25, 2015
- 4,931
- 3,570
We got people in here that are talking themselves into believing that Trump said something worse than he actually did. Got dudes in here even saying “i know trump says the nword too”. Its ridiculous
Best thing everyone can do is ignore this troll.
My guess based on the fact that he plays dumb on race but can immediately draw a line from an unhinged rant in Pennsylvania about schools forcibly changing kids genders to a privacy bill in California is that he's a single issue voter. In this case, it's anti-LGBTQ so he doesn't care that Trump and the Republicans are trying to get rid of our democracy, have sold us out to foreign powers, want to destroy the environment, and hate minorities and immigrants as long as they hate the same people he hates.
Like I said, just ignore him because
1) He's nothing but bad faith arguments and "just asking questions"
2) The more you engage with him, the more it feeds into his victim complex i.e. "why do you guys only trash talk Republicans, whys our side the only one that gets fact checked?" Etc.
My guess based on the fact that he plays dumb on race but can immediately draw a line from an unhinged rant in Pennsylvania about schools forcibly changing kids genders to a privacy bill in California is that he's a single issue voter. In this case, it's anti-LGBTQ so he doesn't care that Trump and the Republicans are trying to get rid of our democracy, have sold us out to foreign powers, want to destroy the environment, and hate minorities and immigrants as long as they hate the same people he hates.
Like I said, just ignore him because
1) He's nothing but bad faith arguments and "just asking questions"
2) The more you engage with him, the more it feeds into his victim complex i.e. "why do you guys only trash talk Republicans, whys our side the only one that gets fact checked?" Etc.
- Dec 23, 2009
- 30,342
- 21,894
Matter of time before there's a slip and he gets axed.
- Jan 8, 2013
- 2,650
- 4,473
Very odd coincidence that most of the conservatives who have popped up in this thread over the years end up getting the banhammer over eventually making racist comments. Almost like it's a pattern
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
Doubt that.
- Dec 23, 2009
- 30,342
- 21,894
You don't think the pattern of "conservative" trolls being banned over the years will hold up? This time it's different?
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
What are you talking about draw a line form an unhinged rant?
. Other than asking what he was talking about I said nothing else about it at all, like nothingWhat are you guys so upset about that you start making up things? You guys acting like 6year olds now
In case you forgot how this topic started here it is, the extent of my comment on the topic
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
Conservative? Troll? Me?
If I was trolling it would be one thing, what you’re talking about I don’t fit in that category. Getting banned on NT was something you might get from me 10years ago, not today buddy. You Guys definitely have me interested now, very curious.
- Dec 23, 2009
- 30,342
- 21,894
Not you.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,233
- 202,671
- Apr 23, 2014
- 44,694
- 17,052
If you guys can’t offer anything better than these silly bully tactics and you CANT Take this guys advice…..I will help you all.
If the question I asked ends up in two pages of this there is legit not a single reason to interact or ask questions of any kind in this thread.
Probably the reason that as a sub to this thread for years my last post was ages ago.
Don’t expect much more from me.
Arguing about this kind of **** is not what I want to be on about and it’s clear this is all you guys have to offer..
I’ll watch from afar, no worries.
I’m not too big to give you all your safe space to act the way you have over the last few days.
- Jan 27, 2013
- 14,717
- 26,102
- Aug 31, 2012
- 12,485
- 35,111
- Mar 16, 2020
- 3,436
- 6,641
mcDonald tramp
- Apr 16, 2014
- 23,955
- 48,422
Fixed
- Dec 23, 2009
- 30,342
- 21,894
We're not calling you a troll. I'm saying
niketock88
is a troll. He argues in bad faith and has no purpose but to antagonize and provoke. You want to defend him? Be my guest. But that won't shield you from criticism if it looks like you agree with his asinine statements.
- Jan 8, 2013
- 2,650
- 4,473
A hit dog will holler
If it doesn't apply to you don't take it personally
If it doesn't apply to you don't take it personally
Similar threads
