- 150,792
- 201,804
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Saw a screenshot on reddit of this and had to see if it was real.
This is wild even for him..
Elon Musk wondering why advertisers are pulling out of Twitter.
This post came across my timeline,
He keeps changing the algorithm so that everyone has to see this crap every day now.
Reasonable minds can disagree about whether or not this content should be censored or not.
What’s indisputable is that a majority of people don’t want to see race science posts. Moreover, very few companies would like one of their ads to appear above or below a post like this.
I guess Bernie and I agree
I guess Bernie and I agree
Elon Musk wondering why advertisers are pulling out of Twitter.
This post came across my timeline,
He keeps changing the algorithm so that everyone has to see this crap every day now.
Reasonable minds can disagree about whether or not this content should be censored or not.
What’s indisputable is that a majority of people don’t want to see race science posts. Moreover, very few companies would like one of their ads to appear above or below a post like this.
Honestly I think if you try to focus reform in a way to filter for certain factors like “state enemy” or “official ally” it doesn’t mean the result would be any different. It would still be a foreign government still spending millions to sway American policy.In a rational world order, Israel and Russia would be treated exactly the same. All countries would be treated the same.
Is it okay for country x to attempt to influence the democratic process of country y? or is it not?
Russia's influence in the 2016 election was far from the only factor accounting for Clinton's loss but we decided that foreign governments should make no material attempts to shift public opinion and therefore shift election outcomes in their favor.
The big question is, what material difference does Israel possess that makes its attempts to sway US public opinion and effect and election outcome acceptable while Russia's attempts are seen as unacceptable?
Whether AIPAC's ad spend was or was not a factor, let alone the decisive factor, in Bush and Bowman's primary defeats, is irrelevant in this context. Russia's clumsy attempts to sway the 2016 election was seen as an attack on the United States, Why is Israel exempt from that same definition of an official state enemy?
Elon Musk wondering why advertisers are pulling out of Twitter.
This post came across my timeline,
He keeps changing the algorithm so that everyone has to see this crap every day now.
Reasonable minds can disagree about whether or not this content should be censored or not.
What’s indisputable is that a majority of people don’t want to see race science posts. Moreover, very few companies would like one of their ads to appear above or below a post like this.
We also need to make campaign season shorter.
Way shorter.
The first job of elected officials is to write, debate, and pass laws. Not fundraise. However, that's what they spend a significant amount of time doing, and it starts as soon as they get in.
SANTOS
Look, nobody hired you because you'd be a brilliant campaigner. You're a
beginner in all this. Yes, at the moment, you're a liability, but you'll
get the hang of it. You're here because you know how to run a country. The
conversation I'm interested in is how do we build a four year plan where
you don't know what kind of Congress you're going to have to work with.
LEO
That's what transition is about.
SANTOS
I don't want to wait until transition. I want a plan in place. I want to
spend transition hiring a staff that can execute it and on day one I want
to get to work, not dickering around for the first three months. You want
something to worry about, worry about that.
LEO
Okay. Well, let's start by reframing the question. Forget about a four-year
term. The Presidency is 18 months. That's your window. After that, there's
midterms. No one on the Hill's got time to do business with you. They're
too busy getting reelected. Then, suddenly, you're running again.
SANTOS
So, I'm basically throwing out everything but my first five pages?
LEO
In the garbage. Realistically, one page, but we can do this in phases.
Saw a screenshot on reddit of this and had to see if it was real.
This is wild even for him..
Someone in here wondered why I called Mike a deplorable and this is exactly why. He was caping for Kemp when he stole the first election from Stacey and ran against her the second time. This is the thing we all need to be on guard for. Trump and the bad guys are going to litigate and try to get this election to the Supreme Court. We have to overwhelm them with our votes.Where killer Mike and his buddy kemp at with **** like this huh
Someone in here wondered why I called Mike a deplorable and this is exactly why. He was caping for Kemp when he stole the first election from Stacey and ran against her the second time. This is the thing we all need to be on guard for. Trump and the bad guys are going to litigate and try to get this election to the Supreme Court. We have to overwhelm them with our votes.
In a rational world order, Israel and Russia would be treated exactly the same. All countries would be treated the same.
Is it okay for country x to attempt to influence the democratic process of country y? or is it not?
Russia's influence in the 2016 election was far from the only factor accounting for Clinton's loss but we decided that foreign governments should make no material attempts to shift public opinion and therefore shift election outcomes in their favor.
The big question is, what material difference does Israel possess that makes its attempts to sway US public opinion and effect and election outcome acceptable while Russia's attempts are seen as unacceptable?
Whether AIPAC's ad spend was or was not a factor, let alone the decisive factor, in Bush and Bowman's primary defeats, is irrelevant in this context. Russia's clumsy attempts to sway the 2016 election was seen as an attack on the United States, Why is Israel exempt from that same definition of an official state enemy?
I don’t know anyone personally who thinks that. I mean in what world does the US start attacking an ally? You have to be off the deep end to think that’s a possibility. And there’s millions of people who want the genocide and open air prisons to stop. Discounting them all as out of touch with reality and adding the caveat of it’s all their quiet thinking they won’t say out loud is an even more ridiculous assertion.a lot of people aren't being honest.
I think most I/P obsessives would like
A) American send troops to dismantle the state of Israel.
B) America fund proxy forces to dismantle the state of Israel.
but they just don't want to say that.
I don’t know anyone personally who thinks that. I mean in what world does the US start attacking an ally? You have to be off the deep end to think that’s a possibility. And there’s millions of people who want the genocide and open air prisons to stop. Discounting them all as out of touch with reality and adding the caveat of it’s all their quiet thinking they won’t say out loud is an even more ridiculous assertion.