- Aug 11, 2012
- 55,518
- 147,144
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe you’re just wrong.
I don’t give AF Hunter. Do your thing boss.
But they BETTER take his pistol permit away from him.
He can’t be out there smoking crack and dealing with hookers while running around his hotel room naked grabbing a pistol.
If he wants to be a danger to himself cool - Just not to others.
If I'm Biden, I would have written him off as being dead. At this stage of his life, if your 52 year old son is out smoking crack and playing around with prostitutes while filming his actions, to hell with him.I think the reasonable worry with Hunter is that his actions could form a security threat. He has no role in government but either way it’s not a stretch that he could be vulnerable to blackmail. We don’t know exactly how much information is out there and who has access to it. With all the drug use, maybe even Hunter himself isn’t exactly sure.
Does it stack up to all the issues posed by Trump’s kids? Not in a million years but I don’t think it’s something to just gloss over.
If I'm Biden, I would have written him off as being dead. At this stage of his life, if your 52 year old son is out smoking crack and playing around with prostitutes while filming his actions, to hell with him.
You have a source for this?Yup. But instead Joe puts him on boards of overseas fossil fuel companies. Too much privilege and narcissism and too much coddling.
Saw someone say “The wrong Biden son died”….
You have a source for this?
There is a difference between saying Hunter Biden got a job because he is the son of Joe Biden, and claiming Joe Biden put him on the board of an overseas fossil fuel company.You had to know this, you’re the political leader of NT.
Hunter Biden Says Work For Ukrainian Firm Wasn't Unethical, But He Wouldn't Do It Again
U.S. President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, says in a forthcoming book that his service on the board of a Ukrainian gas firm at the center of the scandal that prompted ex-President Donald Trump's first impeachment wasn't unethical and didn't represent a lack of judgment on his part.www.rferl.org
Hunter Biden, the black sheep who got Trump impeached, explained
A troubled guy at the center of the fake scandal that became a real scandal.www.vox.com
Joe Biden didn’t do anything to help Hunter in Ukraine
Back in 2014 after a change of regime in Ukraine, Hunter Biden joined the board of a scandal-plagued Ukrainian natural gas company named Burisma. Hunter had no apparent qualifications for the job except that his father was the vice president and involved in the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy.
He got paid up to $50,000 per month for the job and the situation constituted the kind of conflict of interest that was normally considered inappropriate in Washington until the Trump era. These days, of course, the president of the United States regularly accepts payments from foreign sources to his company while in office, and so do the Trump children. The Obama administration probably should have done something about this at the time, but the White House couldn’t literally force Hunter not to accept the job. And given the larger family context, you can see why Joe might have been reluctant to confront his son about it.
This would all be a small footnote in history except that by 2016, officials throughout the Obama administration and in Western Europe had come to a consensus that Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin, wasn’t doing enough to crack down on corruption. Biden, as he later colorfully recounted, delivered the message that the West wanted Shokin gone or else loan guarantees would be held up, and Shokin was, in turn, fired.
There was nothing remotely controversial about this at the time. No congressional Republicans complained about it, and the European Union hailed the decision to fire Shokin. The reason there is video footage of Biden touting his personal role in this is it was considered a foreign policy triumph that Biden wanted to claim credit for, not anything sordid or embarrassing.
But Shokin, of course, didn’t want to go down on the theory that he was corrupt or incompetent. So he started offering another theory: he was fired for going after Burisma by Joe Biden operating on behalf of Hunter Biden.
The question of whether Shokin was actually investigating Burisma at all is a matter of dispute (the relevant Ukrainian players have told inconsistent stories), but this is clearly not the reason he was fired. The desire to push him out was fully bipartisan in the United States and reflected a consensus across European governments, not anything idiosyncratic to Biden.
The notion that firing Shokin was somehow problematic was not in the air until the New York Times ran a story co-bylined by Ken Vogel and a Ukrainian journalist named Iuliia Mendel (who a few weeks later would become Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s official spokesperson) highlighting Rudy Giuliani’s efforts at muckraking.
The worst you can say about any of this, however, was that Hunter’s position on the board was a standing conflict of interest that should have been avoided. There’s no evidence that Joe did anything wrong, specifically. But an examination of the life and times of Hunter Biden does provide a reminder that most Americans thought politics as usual was corrupt long before Trump arrived on the scene to make it more corrupt.
There is a difference between saying Hunter Biden got a job because he is the son of Joe Biden, and claiming Joe Biden put him on the board of an overseas fossil fuel company.
One of the articles you posted literally has a section talking about Joe Biden having nothing to do with Hunter getting the job...
So you can be snarky and call me whatever you want. But that doesn't make what you said true.
Fair enoughI wasn’t being snarky. I was actually surprised.
Very true. I worded it incorrectly. My bad.
Let me correct myself: Joe Biden didn’t get Hunter the job - but Hunter being the son of Vice President Joe Biden got him that job.
Fair enough
I didn't mean to come off so combative, apologies
It is just that Joe directly getting Hunter the job is a popular right-wing conspiracy. So when I read our post I wanted to push back on that specific point.
What matters is the truth by any mean necessary.
You have a right to go hard - especially with the current state of this country.
I will say, while I feel the Hunter Biden story is getting way more attention than it deserves, Hunter Biden offends my liberal egalitarian sensibilities deeply
Nepotism is a normal part of the world today. You see it in high end schools, the higher end jobs, and board seats.
Republicans are as guilty if not more of it. Trump was the worse with his daughter and son in law working in the cabinet. That’s like a step no president has ever taken in the past.
wrong about what part?
Y’all acting like the votes going matter
We still have to show up and vote so that there is an election to steal
Can't make it easy for them and just give it to them
If no one votes the "Independent State Legislature doctrine" will not be needed to perpetuate permanent minority rule in certain states
If you're in North Carolina for example, vote in the NC Supreme Court election in November as if your life depends on it
I’m specifically objecting to:
But I think these people are making my point better than I am
nepotism and power do. it's human nature.Nepotism and Capitalism go hand and hand.
nepotism and power do. it's human nature.