- 1,125
- 1,188
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2008
OFFICIAL 2022-2023 COLLEGE FOOTBALL THREAD
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Bobby Layne,
- Start date
- Status
- 33,268
- 12,412
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- 43,636
- 8,636
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- 39,340
- 42,779
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- 33,268
- 12,412
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- 19,184
- 19,848
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
Hopefully 11 teams leave, and then the buffs will claim the conference championship next year.
- 25,234
- 13,300
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
Unintended consequences
- 30,498
- 5,958
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
- 105,476
- 193,157
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
- 39,340
- 42,779
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
I 100% knew they would put LSU over USC...
- 12,531
- 5,631
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
Does Cal care?
There’s probably some there that look at a potential Pac 12 collapse as away to deemphasize athletics.
- 411
- 1,416
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2019
All you Michigan fans can eat a pile of donkey doo doo. We comin for another 10 year streak. Hate you bastards. O-H..
- 23,990
- 19,289
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2010
They have to cover their asses so if LSU upsets UGA they get into the playoff
- 39,340
- 42,779
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
I have been saying this for years. The committee sets these things up. People just have to do thier part.
SC wins out, they are in. LSU wins out, they are in.
TCU wins out, they are in.
Winner of OSU and Michigan is in.
Now if SC and TCU lose games, then all bets are off.
- 33,268
- 12,412
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,378
- 90,094
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
The UC Board of Regents are Clowns if they try to make UCLA stay.
jpzx
Supporter
- 57,578
- 27,265
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
- 39,340
- 42,779
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
If LSU and TCU win out...we (SC) are screwed IMO.
Pac 12 gotta thank themselves for that. Sending that crap ref crew to Utah might keep the Pac 12 out again...
A lot of football left to be played.
If I'm being honest I don't think we are gonna win out.
- 33,268
- 12,412
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
At least they’re consistent with the reasoning. They said after USC’s loss to Utah that “it was 1 point on the road in a tough environment with a lot of emotion and other stuff.” So they’re saying the way games go matters more than the final result.
- 33,268
- 12,412
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
If LSU and USC both win out, they’d each have wins against 3 top 25 teams, but LSU would have 2 losses (both at home and worse than SC’s loss.) A 2 loss SEC champ getting in over a 1 loss champion that lost on the road by 1 point would just be the committee saying beating the brands of Bama and UGA trump anything any other program can do and it doesn’t matter if LSU got absolutely blown out at home in one of those losses. That would prob break the playoff format.
That said, that’s all rat poison. USC and its fans don’t care about any of that. We’re 0-0. Beat ND.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,378
- 90,094
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
What a joke. LSU's wins were average at best and that Bama game had 0 defense. LSU doesn't pass the eye test IMO. They are a decent team but the SEC bias is staggering
- 33,268
- 12,412
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
USC: road wins - 5; top-25 road wins - 2; wins against teams with 7+ win - 4.
LSU: road wins - 3; top-25 road wins - 0; wins against teams with 7+ wins - 3
UGA: road wins - 4; top-25 road wins - 0; wins against teams with 7+ wins - 3
- 23,990
- 19,289
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2010
The ole miss team that just got blown out by Arkansas?
Wow.
I forgot an SEC loss is considered a win
- 30,175
- 21,585
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
Quality loss to a SEC team > close win to a PAC team. Always has been.
- 30,498
- 5,958
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
Clemson shoots right up and takes the last spot.
- Status
