- Jul 7, 2011
- 7,728
- 3,808
Y'all really think Kyrie and Rose are comparable at this point in their career?
Did you not watch the Finals?
How is that a question?
Did you not watch the Finals?
How is that a question?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Replacing good efficient offense for great defense. Not a bad trade. Depending on what the team needs.Patrick is a pitbull, he plays good defense, so why not ?
Their defense are comparable and so are their playmaking. Yes.Y'all really think Kyrie and Rose are comparable at this point in their career?
Did you not watch the Finals?
How is that a question?
I think we got a winner here, Patrick Beverly.We have plenty of offensive people, so i would welcome Patrick with open arms.
This generation is turning into a PG league, might as well get one that plays good defense.
Replacing good efficient offense for great defense. Not a bad trade. Depending on what the team needs.Patrick is a pitbull, he plays good defense, so why not ?
Their defense are comparable and so are their playmaking. Yes.Y'all really think Kyrie and Rose are comparable at this point in their career?
Did you not watch the Finals?
How is that a question?
You're talking about offense, Knicks don't need offense right now.You're just leaving out the part about Kyrie averaging significantly more points, assists and steals.
Plus the fact that he can open up defenses with his outside shooting and his clutch factor.
I'd take Kyrie in a heartbeat over D. Rose. Anyone with sense would.
We're arguing with the 2 Rose stans of the thread
I have no clue what's going on in here.
Do you see how I am relating this point of emphasis to this current Knicks team?Lol
You can't just strip Kyrie of his offensive abilities and focus on his defense. Gotta compare players in their totality.
But Kyrie is still a much better defender than Rose at this point. He can actually keep opposing guards in front of him and lock up when he needs to.
Their playmaking ability is just about equally suspect.
But you asked who we would pick between Rose and Irving.
It's not even comparable.
Like asking who we'd rather between Jordan and Steve Smith.
Who in here wouldn't want Kyrie as their starting PG over D. Rose?
I lowkey want us to get rid of Derrick....just so the Bulls fans can leave this thread
BINGO!i don't think he's comparing Rose and Irving in terms of who they are as players. i think he's comparing their play STYLES. in terms of style, they both are very similar. both are score first PGs that don't look to set up their teammates all that often, and both are liabilities on defense. obviously, Kyrie is way better than Rose, but they are similar players. that being said, i don't think having Kyrie over Derrick would make us THAT much better. we'd still give up a ton of points. our problem is defense and inserting Kyrie doesn't help that at all.
speaking of 2k and Beverly, i always traded for him in MyLeague